Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Canon lens recommendations
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Aug 8, 2016 18:26:36   #
MACT Loc: Connecticut
 
My son has just acquired an EOS-1D body, and is looking for the best range of lenses. I know nothing about Canon, so I hesitate to advise him. His budget is practically unlimited (tens of thousands), but he doesn't want to spend unnecessarily. While I think most of his shooting will be indoors, city streets and parks, he might also venture into both wildlife and macro, so you can be pretty wide-ranging in your suggestions.
Many thanks

Reply
Aug 8, 2016 18:41:18   #
Bob Yankle Loc: Burlington, NC
 
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L ll (Wide Angle), Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM Macro (Macro), Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM (Medium Telephoto, best "walk around lens for everyday stuff), Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II (best lens quality of all the Canon Lens, Medium Telephoto, good for wedding photography, Sport photography), Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II (Long Telephoto). Canon's "L" series glass is top of the line for Canon cameras.

Reply
Aug 8, 2016 19:01:08   #
MACT Loc: Connecticut
 
Thanks Bob. Are there any prime lenses you think are worth adding?

Reply
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Aug 8, 2016 19:01:23   #
KD Stern Loc: Yorba Linda, Ca
 
My recommendations are lenses I currently use ----- Wide Angle: I go with L Primes say 24 1.4 L II along with the 35mm 1.4 II (a really great "walk around lens") nothing wrong with the 50mm 1.4 & 85mm 1.8 (also a great companion of the 35mm when walking around) then the sharpest lens in my bag the 135mm 2.0 L --- anything above that then there is of course as bob states the 70/200 & the 100/400 --- I use the old model 100/400 --- The 70/200 is a great/fantastic lens that due to my other lenses & my use & their coverage I have never been able to fully justify purchasing -

Reply
Aug 8, 2016 19:23:59   #
Bob Yankle Loc: Burlington, NC
 
KD Stern wrote:
My recommendations are lenses I currently use ----- Wide Angle: I go with L Primes say 24 1.4 L II along with the 35mm 1.4 II (a really great "walk around lens") nothing wrong with the 50mm 1.4 & 85mm 1.8 (also a great companion of the 35mm when walking around) then the sharpest lens in my bag the 135mm 2.0 L --- anything above that then there is of course as bob states the 70/200 & the 100/400 --- I use the old model 100/400
While I don't shoot with Primes (other than the 100mm Macro), there is a UHH Bird photographer (Carolina Wings) who gets absolutely great telephoto shots with a Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS. This is the next lens on my bucket list.

Reply
Aug 8, 2016 19:30:59   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Do you know which 1D model?

I read an interesting note yesterday on a different discussion board about moving in doubles as in 24 & 50 for primes or 35 and 85. The comment was in response to a three lens kit for travel where the third lens tended to be one of Canon's variations on the 70-200 zoom.

Thinking practical with unlimited funding, I'd consider the following:

16-35 f/4L - use the clean high ISO capable of at least the 1D IV if he didn't get either of the 1DX models
50 f/1.2L
135 f/2L - you can't point this lens at anything and fail to get a great picture ...
100-400L II - I suggest this lens rather than any of the 70-200Ls unless he needs f/2.8 speed for low-light

I'm suggesting from my own experiences as well as thinking about that 2- or 3-lens kit for travel and / or being mobile. I'm not trying to cover all focal lengths. Rather, a set of excellent tools for most any situation alone or paired with just one other. Either the 135 or 100-400 can fill a macro need until he wants / needs a dedicated lens and has invested in a tripod.

Reply
Aug 8, 2016 21:30:43   #
asiafish Loc: Bakersfield, CA
 
My three lens kit for Canon is the 35/1.4 L II, 50/1.2 L and 1002.8 L IS Macro. Mirrors the classic Leica 3 lens kit of 35, 50 and 90mm.

Reply
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Aug 8, 2016 21:57:12   #
KD Stern Loc: Yorba Linda, Ca
 
There is one lens I forgot to mention --- It is the one I use for Macro/closeup Photos --- It's Canon's 500D closeup lens or what is often call a filter lens --- I generally use it in conjunction with the 135 2.0 L --- I use the 77mm version -- It does quite an admirable job without further filling-up the Camera Bag with yet another full size lens

Reply
Aug 8, 2016 22:08:09   #
Haydon
 
MACT wrote:
My son has just acquired an EOS-1D body, and is looking for the best range of lenses. I know nothing about Canon, so I hesitate to advise him. His budget is practically unlimited (tens of thousands), but he doesn't want to spend unnecessarily. While I think most of his shooting will be indoors, city streets and parks, he might also venture into both wildlife and macro, so you can be pretty wide-ranging in your suggestions.
Many thanks


If his budget is unlimited then consider the 11-24 mm F4 if he wants a UWA.

Reply
Aug 8, 2016 22:46:07   #
Anandnra Loc: Tennessee
 
MACT wrote:
My son has just acquired an EOS-1D body, and is looking for the best range of lenses. I know nothing about Canon, so I hesitate to advise him. His budget is practically unlimited (tens of thousands), but he doesn't want to spend unnecessarily. While I think most of his shooting will be indoors, city streets and parks, he might also venture into both wildlife and macro, so you can be pretty wide-ranging in your suggestions.
Many thanks


11-24 L 4.0
24-70 L 2.8
70-200 L 2.8 IS II
100-400 L IS II 4.5-5.6 should cover it to the most part.

Reply
Aug 8, 2016 23:21:28   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Cost no object:

16-35 f2.8L II
24-70 f2.8L II or 24-105 f4L IS
70-200 f2.8L II IS
100-400 f4.5-5.6L II IS
100 f2.8L Macro IS

Reply
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Aug 8, 2016 23:43:27   #
Islandgal Loc: Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Canada
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Do you know which 1D model?

I read an interesting note yesterday on a different discussion board about moving in doubles as in 24 & 50 for primes or 35 and 85. The comment was in response to a three lens kit for travel where the third lens tended to be one of Canon's variations on the 70-200 zoom.

Thinking practical with unlimited funding, I'd consider the following:

16-35 f/4L - use the clean high ISO capable of at least the 1D IV if he didn't get either of the 1DX models
50 f/1.2L
135 f/2L - you can't point this lens at anything and fail to get a great picture ...
100-400L II - I suggest this lens rather than any of the 70-200Ls unless he needs f/2.8 speed for low-light

I'm suggesting from my own experiences as well as thinking about that 2- or 3-lens kit for travel and / or being mobile. I'm not trying to cover all focal lengths. Rather, a set of excellent tools for most any situation alone or paired with just one other. Either the 135 or 100-400 can fill a macro need until he wants / needs a dedicated lens and has invested in a tripod.
Do you know which 1D model? br br I read an inter... (show quote)


I wish I'd talked to you before I bought the 17-40mm f4... my next goal is going to be the 135 f2 after checking reviews!

Reply
Aug 8, 2016 23:43:41   #
asiafish Loc: Bakersfield, CA
 
Cost no object:
24/1.4 L II, 35/1.4 L II, 50/1.2 L, 85/1.2 L II, 100/2.8 IS L Macro, 135/2.0 L

Cost a consideration:
24/2.8 IS, 35/2.0 IS, 50/1.8 STM, 100/2.8 Macro

Money really tight:
24/2.8 IS, 50/1.8 STM, 100/2.8 Macro

Reply
Aug 9, 2016 05:42:54   #
Al Freeedman
 
I would include the Canon 24 MM lens. It's a great walk around lens. Small & compact.

Captain Al

Reply
Aug 9, 2016 06:27:02   #
mikedidi46 Loc: WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
 
any 'L' lens that suits his fancy depending on what he wants to shoot

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.