Time to upgrade. My 24-105 f4 lost communication with my 5D SR at the beginning of my 15 day land/sea tour of Alaska and the Yukon. I was forced to shoot everything at f4.0 and use manual focus. All things considered it could have been worse. I'm pretty sure it's the ribbon cable as I have experienced this once before and had the lens repaired. That was good for about 2.5 years at a cost of $350. So... time for an upgrade. I stopped by my local camera store today and it was suggested that I buy the Tamron 24-70 f2.8 Di VC USD @$1,200 rather than the Canon 24-70 f2.8 L II USM @ $1,800. Is there any reason that I should not follow this advice? I shoot mostly corporate events and real estate. I'll likely have the 24-70 repaired back to factory condition and sell it to off-set the cost.
Thanks,
Bob
fotowerks wrote:
Time to upgrade. My 24-105 f4 lost communication with my 5D SR at the beginning of my 15 day land/sea tour of Alaska and the Yukon. I was forced to shoot everything at f4.0 and use manual focus. All things considered it could have been worse. I'm pretty sure it's the ribbon cable as I have experienced this once before and had the lens repaired. That was good for about 2.5 years at a cost of $350. So... time for an upgrade. I stopped by my local camera store today and it was suggested that I buy the Tamron 24-70 f2.8 Di VC USD @$1,200 rather than the Canon 24-70 f2.8 L II USM @ $1,800. Is there any reason that I should not follow this advice? I shoot mostly corporate events and real estate. I'll likely have the 24-70 repaired back to factory condition and sell it to off-set the cost.
Thanks,
Bob
Time to upgrade. My 24-105 f4 lost communication w... (
show quote)
I would ignore that advice and consider the Tokina 24-70 instead. Sorry, this is off topic.
Really? What is your reasoning?
Thanks,
Bob
fotowerks wrote:
Really? What is your reasoning?
Thanks,
Bob
Exceptional quality, lower price. Read some reviews before your final decision.
The Tammy has vibration reduction and the Canon does not. The Canon has a quieter, faster, ultrasonic autofocus motor. Both are very, very sharp.
Jim Bob wrote:
I would ignore that advice and consider the Tokina 24-70 instead. Sorry, this is off topic.
Chances are Jim Bob bought the Tokina so obviously it is the best. If another Hog who has bought the Canon chimes in his will be the best will it not? Whilst appreciating you are asking a good question you will not get an unbiased opinion here my friend. Canon men swear their system is best Nikon men say NO mine is best and Olympus users bang on about how easy it is to carry around. Nothing said that helps the prospective buyer.
Ask further question of your camera shop guy and if he appears genuine and to know his stuff follow his advice.
Cuts through all the opinionated shite your gonna get served up here.
Bob, I own the Canon 24-70 and never had a complaint. I did a Google search and have this link that can perhaps help you out. Good Luck, Gary
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Tamron-24-70mm-f-2.8-Di-VC-USD-Lens-Review.aspxfotowerks wrote:
Time to upgrade. My 24-105 f4 lost communication with my 5D SR at the beginning of my 15 day land/sea tour of Alaska and the Yukon. I was forced to shoot everything at f4.0 and use manual focus. All things considered it could have been worse. I'm pretty sure it's the ribbon cable as I have experienced this once before and had the lens repaired. That was good for about 2.5 years at a cost of $350. So... time for an upgrade. I stopped by my local camera store today and it was suggested that I buy the Tamron 24-70 f2.8 Di VC USD @$1,200 rather than the Canon 24-70 f2.8 L II USM @ $1,800. Is there any reason that I should not follow this advice? I shoot mostly corporate events and real estate. I'll likely have the 24-70 repaired back to factory condition and sell it to off-set the cost.
Thanks,
Bob
Time to upgrade. My 24-105 f4 lost communication w... (
show quote)
Billyspad wrote:
Chances are Jim Bob bought the Tokina so obviously it is the best. If another Hog who has bought the Canon chimes in his will be the best will it not? Whilst appreciating you are asking a good question you will not get an unbiased opinion here my friend. Canon men swear their system is best Nikon men say NO mine is best and Olympus users bang on about how easy it is to carry around. Nothing said that helps the prospective buyer.
Ask further question of your camera shop guy and if he appears genuine and to know his stuff follow his advice.
Cuts through all the opinionated shite your gonna get served up here.
Chances are Jim Bob bought the Tokina so obviously... (
show quote)
What a nice pleasant and uncalled for response.
Billyspad wrote:
Chances are Jim Bob bought the Tokina so obviously it is the best. If another Hog who has bought the Canon chimes in his will be the best will it not? Whilst appreciating you are asking a good question you will not get an unbiased opinion here my friend. Canon men swear their system is best Nikon men say NO mine is best and Olympus users bang on about how easy it is to carry around. Nothing said that helps the prospective buyer.
Ask further question of your camera shop guy and if he appears genuine and to know his stuff follow his advice.
Cuts through all the opinionated shite your gonna get served up here.
Chances are Jim Bob bought the Tokina so obviously... (
show quote)
I never said it was the best Mr. Dumbass. I said it was worth consideration.
fotowerks wrote:
Time to upgrade. My 24-105 f4 lost communication with my 5D SR at the beginning of my 15 day land/sea tour of Alaska and the Yukon. I was forced to shoot everything at f4.0 and use manual focus. All things considered it could have been worse. I'm pretty sure it's the ribbon cable as I have experienced this once before and had the lens repaired. That was good for about 2.5 years at a cost of $350. So... time for an upgrade. I stopped by my local camera store today and it was suggested that I buy the Tamron 24-70 f2.8 Di VC USD @$1,200 rather than the Canon 24-70 f2.8 L II USM @ $1,800. Is there any reason that I should not follow this advice? I shoot mostly corporate events and real estate. I'll likely have the 24-70 repaired back to factory condition and sell it to off-set the cost.
Thanks,
Bob
Time to upgrade. My 24-105 f4 lost communication w... (
show quote)
Put your current lens on ebay as "For Parts" and take a look at this video comparison.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HV9ju8LmRfU
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
fotowerks wrote:
Time to upgrade. My 24-105 f4 lost communication with my 5D SR at the beginning of my 15 day land/sea tour of Alaska and the Yukon. I was forced to shoot everything at f4.0 and use manual focus. All things considered it could have been worse. I'm pretty sure it's the ribbon cable as I have experienced this once before and had the lens repaired. That was good for about 2.5 years at a cost of $350. So... time for an upgrade. I stopped by my local camera store today and it was suggested that I buy the Tamron 24-70 f2.8 Di VC USD @$1,200 rather than the Canon 24-70 f2.8 L II USM @ $1,800. Is there any reason that I should not follow this advice? I shoot mostly corporate events and real estate. I'll likely have the 24-70 repaired back to factory condition and sell it to off-set the cost.
Thanks,
Bob
Time to upgrade. My 24-105 f4 lost communication w... (
show quote)
I am a Nikon guy for over 50 years and I strongly suggest you go with the Canon glass. No contest. By the way, that camera store makes more on the Tamron than the Canon. The profit margin is greater on the Tamron, that is why they are pushing that on you. GO CANON.
billnikon wrote:
I am a Nikon guy for over 50 years and I strongly suggest you go with the Canon glass. No contest. By the way, that camera store makes more on the Tamron than the Canon. The profit margin is greater on the Tamron, that is why they are pushing that on you. GO CANON.
Some can argue that there is a contest!
I have 11 Nikon lenses and 1 Tokina and prefer to stay with Nikon,but it's difficult to ignore some of the comparisons and at the same time evaluate your use and if you can be happier with spending more money,that's your decision. There is a certain amount of vanity involved and that's okay. Depends on how much better you think your images will be,having weighed your options. It surely i important to make a choice that will bring you satisfaction.
I am currently contemplating the Tamron 24-70VR vs the Nikon 24-70VR. Lots of room for thought!
abc1234
Loc: Elk Grove Village, Illinois
If you are considering the Tamron, why not also consider Sigma. They rival Tamron, Canon and Nikon and you probably will not go wrong with any of these, unless you are very critical. Also, you might want a Sigma with the Dock for those advantages. I see Tamron just introduced a dock too. Something worth considering.
Good luck with you decision and enjoy the results.
DaveO wrote:
What a nice pleasant and uncalled for response.
Sorry if some folks cant accept the truth and if you feel you an unbiased informed opinion ask away. Me I would ask an expert like the guys who work in camera shops very often.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.