Billy Jo , mother of seven,
Mangles my friend childbirth is not generally kind to a woman's body and to be fair this lady is in good shape after going for it seven times. However whilst willing to concede beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder you have presented for us a woman who would look so much better fully dressed.
Please no one give me the usual crap about bringing out the inner beauty etc. Its quite simply a gal whose modeling days are behind her and no amount of sympathetic lighting will hide that. Her tummy is a mess Im afraid. If she needs to earn the cash to feed her large family just give her whatever her fee is and shoot her wearing clothes. Let her retain some dignity.
Billyspad wrote:
Mangles my friend childbirth is not generally kind to a woman's body and to be fair this lady is in good shape after going for it seven times. However whilst willing to concede beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder you have presented for us a woman who would look so much better fully dressed.
Please no one give me the usual crap about bringing out the inner beauty etc. Its quite simply a gal whose modeling days are behind her and no amount of sympathetic lighting will hide that. Her tummy is a mess Im afraid. If she needs to earn the cash to feed her large family just give her whatever her fee is and shoot her wearing clothes. Let her retain some dignity.
Mangles my friend childbirth is not generally kind... (
show quote)
I have never paid anyone to pose for me!!!! and I didn't work with "models" . I did work with a bunch wanna be models, and found women with no aspirations fo becoming a model were the most pleasing and easiest to work with.
Your "advise" as her earning money was uncalled for!!!!
Billyspad wrote:
Mangles my friend childbirth is not generally kind to a woman's body and to be fair this lady is in good shape after going for it seven times. However whilst willing to concede beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder you have presented for us a woman who would look so much better fully dressed.
Please no one give me the usual crap about bringing out the inner beauty etc. Its quite simply a gal whose modeling days are behind her and no amount of sympathetic lighting will hide that. Her tummy is a mess Im afraid. If she needs to earn the cash to feed her large family just give her whatever her fee is and shoot her wearing clothes. Let her retain some dignity.
Mangles my friend childbirth is not generally kind... (
show quote)
Here she is all dressed up.....Happy now Billyspad ?!
Are all the local girls fed up with your attitude and you are here to vent your frustration?
Have another beer or a few less whichever applies!
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-399979-1.html
TucsonCoyote wrote:
Here she is all dressed up.....Happy now Billyspad ?!
Are all the local girls fed up with your attitude and you are here to vent your frustration?
Have another beer or a few less whichever applies!
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-399979-1.htmlTucson I could not have found a better link to prove my point so thank you. A delightful model when dressed.
Manglesphoto wrote:
I have never paid anyone to pose for me!!!! and I didn't work with "models" . I did work with a bunch wanna be models, and found women with no aspirations fo becoming a model were the most pleasing and easiest to work with.
Your "advise" as her earning money was uncalled for!!!!
Well ya see Mangles my friend I have been around 64 years often with a camera around my neck and lived in lots of places and I have never ever met a woman who just volunteered to get naked so I could photograph them and then make the image available and free to view on the net!
I come to this forum and you and others here tell me gals are knocking down their doors to perform without their kit in front of their lens and all for free?
Can you understand why I find this a tad improbable? Is it your good looks or charm that causes this phenomenon do ya reckon.
Billyspad wrote:
Well ya see Mangles my friend I have been around 64 years often with a camera around my neck and lived in lots of places and I have never ever met a woman who just volunteered to get naked so I could photograph them and then make the image available and free to view on the net!
I come to this forum and you and others here tell me gals are knocking down their doors to perform without their kit in front of their lens and all for free?
Can you understand why I find this a tad improbable? Is it your good looks or charm that causes this phenomenon do ya reckon.
Well ya see Mangles my friend I have been around 6... (
show quote)
Nobody is knocking down
Well I've been around for 77 years and far from "good looking" As of this date nobody has knocked down my door to pose for me, but I have done my fair share of portfolio work for wanna be models. women with no experience !! and most were not "model" material we traded my work and studio time for images no more no less. I have also done work for ladies wanting images for their significant others, and quite a few exhibitionist
They came to me because I treated them with respect, and did not criticize them because of their flaws, and made no demands of them. Once again all images used were with the permission of the ladies for services rendered.
P.S I am not your friend.
Billyspad wrote:
Mangles my friend childbirth is not generally kind to a woman's body and to be fair this lady is in good shape after going for it seven times. However whilst willing to concede beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder you have presented for us a woman who would look so much better fully dressed.
Please no one give me the usual crap about bringing out the inner beauty etc. Its quite simply a gal whose modeling days are behind her and no amount of sympathetic lighting will hide that. Her tummy is a mess Im afraid. If she needs to earn the cash to feed her large family just give her whatever her fee is and shoot her wearing clothes. Let her retain some dignity.
Mangles my friend childbirth is not generally kind... (
show quote)
Oh Billy. You made me laugh so much. She reminds me of myself too, so I wouldn't be taking my clothes off even though I am rather slim.
Manglesphoto wrote:
Billy Jo , mother of seven,
I have looked at Billy Jo wearing clothes and what a beautiful woman she is and you have captured her perfectly. I must say that I preferred her in that photo.
big-guy
Loc: Peterborough Ontario Canada
I find the shot tasteful and flattering to the model. Is she Playboy material? Definitely not but neither are 80% of the (heavily airbrushed) models they use. If she were my partner I would be proud to have that on my wall. Good job by the artist.
big-guy wrote:
I find the shot tasteful and flattering to the model. Is she Playboy material? Definitely not but neither are 80% of the (heavily airbrushed) models they use. If she were my partner I would be proud to have that on my wall. Good job by the artist.
Thank you very much
One thing I believe people have over looked the lady is 6'4"
I could have removed diminished her stretch marks, but she did not want them removed.
I think she is a beautiful woman, who is rightfully proud of life's road marks.
big-guy wrote:
I find the shot tasteful and flattering to the model. Is she Playboy material? Definitely not but neither are 80% of the (heavily airbrushed) models they use. If she were my partner I would be proud to have that on my wall. Good job by the artist.
For what it is worth I think she is beautiful and the Photographer did a great job capturing her. Truth be told 90% of the population looks more like her than the models you see in Playboy and 80% of those have been enhances with surgery and airbrushing, so she looks real. If Billyspad wants to see perfect photographs of models, who have been enhances surgically and with airbrushing then he should go to the news stand and pick up a magazine. I think he just likes to make negative comments though, I have never seen anything positive from him.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.