The Boathouse.
Glen Muick is my latest discovery. I got this shot of a boathouse and I thought I'd put it up for editing. It's a merge of bracketed shots, so there should be lots of data for pushing and pulling. I'll attach a DNG below the JPG.
-
R.G., thanks for letting me play with this beautiful picture!! I put it through the mill, playing with Impressions 2 and then a few NIK filters.
Not to different from yours, I think. I will see it better after I post it.
I thought it interesting. When I open a DNG file in photoshop the first screen is Camera raw. When I opened your DNG file in photoshop you sliders were set to your last setting you did on your File. This will happen on my files didn't think it would on your files.
Jim-Pops wrote:
......When I opened your DNG file in photoshop you sliders were set to your last setting you did on your File......
When I did the merge I selected Auto-tone. The DNG file presumably keeps a record of those adjustments. You've brought out more detail, especially in the clouds. Thanks for contributing, Jim-Pops.
angela k wrote:
R.G., thanks for letting me play with this beautiful picture!! I put it through the mill, playing with Impressions 2 and then a few NIK filters.
Glad you enjoyed, Angela. Your treatment perfectly suits the atmosphere of the place. I'll probably be posting more shots of Glen Muick showing the weather when it's less co-operative (but more typical).
Thanks for allowing me to make a evening shot out of your nice photo to see what the area would look like toward the end of the day . Tommy
R.G. wrote:
Glad you enjoyed, Angela. Your treatment perfectly suits the atmosphere of the place. I'll probably be posting more shots of Glen Muick showing the weather when it's less co-operative (but more typical).
Glad you liked my interpretation R.G and I'll be looking forward to playing with more of your work!!
R.G. wrote:
Glen Muick is my latest discovery. I got this shot of a boathouse and I thought I'd put it up for editing. It's a merge of bracketed shots, so there should be lots of data for pushing and pulling. I'll attach a DNG below the JPG.
-
R.G.
See if this thought pleases you.
RBorud
flyguy
Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico
angela k wrote:
R.G., thanks for letting me play with this beautiful picture!! I put it through the mill, playing with Impressions 2 and then a few NIK filters.
Nice job of bringing out the details and making the image come "alive" without giving it that "crunchy" and over processed look.
kubota king wrote:
Thanks for allowing me to make a evening shot out of your nice photo to see what the area would look like toward the end of the day . Tommy
Thank you Tommy. I too enjoy a bit of roamin' in the gloamin'
. Your edit whispers of the magic that places like that have at that time of day.
rborud wrote:
R.G.
See if this thought pleases you.
RBorud
Thanks for participating, RB. There's a moodiness in the sky and it looks like there might be some rain coming down the glen.
flyguy wrote:
Nice job of bringing out the details and making the image come "alive" without giving it that "crunchy" and over processed look.
Thanks for the kind words flyguy!!! Glad you liked, the problem is, I'd never be able to do it again!! lol...
Here's my version R.G. I tried to return the balance from top to bottom. It was important to bring back a natural but cloudy looking sky without it looking to overprocessed. My methods are sheer madness...Processed with Photomatrix, Photoshop Elements with XXL, Topaz Adjust then Topaz DeNoise and back to PSE for a slight sharpen. Overall, seems like I got fair results, but I could not get the choppy water (lower right) to look better. Anyway...was fun to get in some practice. Thanks for the opportunity.
James56 wrote:
Here's my version R.G. I tried to return the balance from top to bottom. It was important to bring back a natural but cloudy looking sky without it looking to overprocessed. My methods are sheer madness...Processed with Photomatrix, Photoshop Elements with XXL, Topaz Adjust then Topaz DeNoise and back to PSE for a slight sharpen. Overall, seems like I got fair results, but I could not get the choppy water (lower right) to look better. Anyway...was fun to get in some practice. Thanks for the opportunity.
Here's my version R.G. I tried to return the bala... (
show quote)
Thanks for joining in, James. That's quite a workflow you've got there
. Your comment about the choppy water left me thinking that I might have used too much anti-ghosting for the merge. Sometimes the softening effect of more blending has quite a desirable effect. I've had that problem before with waves. There might be madness in your method, but the results speak for themselves.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.