One thing I noticed about this "pounder" idiot (what kind of moron would name himself "pounder"?) is that everyone thinks he is a moron. I don't think I've ever read a post that said they think he is not a moron for choosing such a stupid avatar name. Ergo, 100% of the forum members consider pounder to be a moron.

See, I can you your same retarded logic, moron.


Let's do some more:

I don't think I've ever read a post that said that pounder is not a faggot. Ergo, 100% of the forum members obviously consider pounder to be a faggot.

I don't think I've ever read a post that said pounder is an upstanding guy. Ergo, 100% of the forum members obviously consider you to NOT be an upstanding guy.

I don't think I've ever read a post that said [fill in the blank]. Ergo, 100% of the forum members obviously do not believe [fill in the blank].


Any more clever logic to share with us, moron?

One thing I noticed about this "pounder" idiot (what kind of moron would name himself "pounder"?) is that everyone thinks he is a moron. I don't think I've ever read a post that said they think he is not a moron for choosing such a stupid avatar name. Ergo, 100% of the forum members consider pounder to be a moron.

See, I can use your same retarded logic, moron.


Let's do some more:

I don't think I've ever read a post that said that pounder is not a faggot. Ergo, 100% of the forum members obviously consider pounder to be a faggot.

I don't think I've ever read a post that said pounder is an upstanding guy. Ergo, 100% of the forum members obviously consider you to NOT be an upstanding guy.

I don't think I've ever read a post that said [fill in the blank]. Ergo, 100% of the forum members obviously do not believe [fill in the blank].


Any more clever logic to share with us, moron?

I'm busy working, manchild. I don't live in the Attic like you do, Blurry. Some people have to work for a living, unlike you, Blurry. I just checked into the thread and noticed your ridiculous hissy fit that I didn't immediately respond to your stupid questions within minutes.

Let me count the ways:

1) I do not sit here on the computer all day, reloading the page every few minutes to see each new post, and then jump on with a response within a few minutes or hours. If you or anyone else expects me to respond to each and every stupid question within minutes, or even hours, or even at all, you will be disappointed.

2) We've already had this discussion about what the founding fathers said about the right of citizens to overthrow governments. They were talking about "tyrannical" regimes - i.e., the unelected British Royal Crown who they declared independence from, not Constitutional representative government. By reading the letters of the founding fathers and the purpose behind the 2nd amendment, it is clear that they never would consider a Constitutional Government like the US as falling under the category of "tyranny" that should be violently overthrown. Rather, the 2nd Amendment was to protect the government from insurrection and other threats. And that was put to the test within a couple of years after our Republic was started, when George Washington led 15,000 "well regulated militia" to put down the Whiskey Rebellion in 1791, putting any questions to rest as to what the purpose of the 2nd Amendment and the purpose of the "well regulated militia". I see no reason to rehash the same debate that has already taken place at least half a dozen times on this forum over the last couple of years. You will never change your mind and continue to insist falsely that the founding fathers would advocate violent overthrow of our Constitutional Democracy.

3) You are being evasive now in claiming that you "never made such a claim" that the "fringe left" is equally willing to resort to violent overthrow as the "fringe right" which you classify Larry Pratt and the other advocates of using the "bullet box if they can't win the ballot box". You most certainly implied exactly that, even if you didn't use those exact words.

4) Don't count on me checking into these threads within your preferred time frame in the future, if ever. My motivation to continue to debating people like you, who waste so much of my time rehashing the same bullshit over and over and over again continues to wane. Also, you're lucky that I even bother responding to you at all after all of your absurd and childish repetitive scripted insults about me "not having a job", "living in the Attic", "leeching off the system", and all the other worn out infantile drivel that was old the first 10 times you used it. Really, Blurry. It's time for you to get a new script. You put me to sleep...

I Gotta go back to work now, manchild. Just remember, my taxes help support lazy asses like you...bye now...

Penny, you do become tiring because you don't know what you're talking about. Mr. Carson may have at one time been a good dr, I don't argue that. Some people are very intelligent in one portion of their lives and absolute dunces at others. Perhaps he has dementia, I don't know his physical condition but I do know he's made some statements that were completely off the wall. You can look them up, I'm not, I'm tired. If that's his "normal" personality, he's very strange. I know, finally the "right" dug up a black person who was for the GOP ... and he turned out to be a dud politically. I'm not making jokes about him because he probably can't help it but he's just not a smart man politically. I really don't care what you think of Obama or anyone else. Please try to get this thru your head...it does not matter to me, it makes no difference to me...and on and on and on...

I'm busy working, manchild. I don't live in the Attic like you do, Blurry. Some people have to work for a living, unlike you, Blurry. I just checked into the thread and noticed your ridiculous hissy fit that I didn't immediately respond to your stupid questions within minutes.

Let me count the ways:

1) I do not sit here on the computer all day, reloading the page every few minutes to see each new post, and then jump on with a response within a few minutes or hours. If you or anyone else expects me to respond to each and every stupid question within minutes, or even hours, or even at all, you will be disappointed.

2) We've already had this discussion about what the founding fathers said about the right of citizens to overthrow governments. They were talking about "tyrannical" regimes - i.e., the unelected British Royal Crown who they declared independence from, not Constitutional representative government. By reading the letters of the founding fathers and the purpose behind the 2nd amendment, it is clear that they never would consider a Constitutional Government like the US as falling under the category of "tyranny" that should be violently overthrown. Rather, the 2nd Amendment was to protect the government from insurrection and other threats. And that was put to the test within a couple of years after our Republic was started, when George Washington led 15,000 "well regulated militia" to put down the Whiskey Rebellion in 1791, putting any questions to rest as to what the purpose of the 2nd Amendment and the purpose of the "well regulated militia". I see no reason to rehash the same debate that has already taken place at least half a dozen times on this forum over the last couple of years. You will never change your mind and continue to insist falsely that the founding fathers would advocate violent overthrow of our Constitutional Democracy.

3) You are being evasive now in claiming that you "never made such a claim" that the "fringe left" is equally willing to resort to violent overthrow as the "fringe right" which you classify Larry Pratt and the other advocates of using the "bullet box if they can't win the ballot box". You most certainly implied exactly that, even if you didn't use those exact words.

4) Don't count on me checking into these threads within your preferred time frame in the future, if ever. My motivation to continue to debating people like you, who waste so much of my time rehashing the same bullshit over and over and over again continues to wane. Also, you're lucky that I even bother responding to you at all after all of your absurd and childish repetitive scripted insults about me "not having a job", "living in the Attic", "leeching off the system", and all the other worn out infantile drivel that was old the first 10 times you used it. Really, Blurry. It's time for you to get a new script. You put me to sleep...

I Gotta go back to work now, manchild. Just remember, my taxes help support lazy asses like you...bye now...

Penny, you do become tiring because you don't know what you're talking about. Mr. Carson may have at one time been a good dr, I don't argue that. Some people are very intelligent in one portion of their lives and absolute dunces at others. Perhaps he has dementia, I don't know his physical condition but I do know he's made some statements that were completely off the wall. You can look them up, I'm not, I'm tired. If that's his "normal" personality, he's very strange. I know, finally the "right" dug up a black person who was for the GOP ... and he turned out to be a dud politically. I'm not making jokes about him because he probably can't help it but he's just not a smart man politically. I really don't care what you think of Obama or anyone else. Please try to get this thru your head...it does not matter to me, it makes no difference to me...and on and on and on...

One thing I noticed about this "pounder" idiot (what kind of moron would name himself "pounder"?) is that everyone thinks he is a moron. I don't think I've ever read a post that said they think he is not a moron for choosing such a stupid avatar name. Ergo, 100% of the forum members consider pounder to be a moron.

See, I can use your same retarded logic, moron.


Let's do some more:

I don't think I've ever read a post that said that pounder is not a faggot. Ergo, 100% of the forum members obviously consider pounder to be a faggot.

I don't think I've ever read a post that said pounder is an upstanding guy. Ergo, 100% of the forum members obviously consider you to NOT be an upstanding guy.

I don't think I've ever read a post that said [fill in the blank]. Ergo, 100% of the forum members obviously do not believe [fill in the blank].


Any more clever logic to share with us, moron?

Penny, you do become tiring because you don't know what you're talking about. Mr. Carson may have at one time been a good dr, I don't argue that. Some people are very intelligent in one portion of their lives and absolute dunces at others. Perhaps he has dementia, I don't know his physical condition but I do know he's made some statements that were completely off the wall. You can look them up, I'm not, I'm tired. If that's his "normal" personality, he's very strange. I know, finally the "right" dug up a black person who was for the GOP ... and he turned out to be a dud politically. I'm not making jokes about him because he probably can't help it but he's just not a smart man politically. I really don't care what you think of Obama or anyone else. Please try to get this thru your head...it does not matter to me, it makes no difference to me...and on and on and on...

Apparently it DOES matter to you because you keep replying. And what part of "America is sick of POLITICIANS" do you not understand? Politicians are corrupt in most cases and people with brains are tired of the corruption.
The right did not "dig" up a black man. A responsible, decent person who didn't like the way this country is headed stepped up and decided to run for president. Who cares that he was black? Dementia? Geez Donna, that's not very intelligent of you to say since I'm pretty sure you don't know what dementia fully entails. Once again, you dislike him because he is Christian.

From her past posts, I think you are correct. She like many progressives hate Christians and would see all of them gone. Lately the progressives have been getting more and more angry in their attacks on anyone who is Christian, moral, and does not support their agenda. I think they are truly afraid that for the first time in many years they will not get a progressive in the white house. To these people that is the worst thing that can happen, as the next president may indeed nominate 4 supreme court justice judges. They do indeed have a reason to be afraid.