Black vs Chrome bodies
Jun 15, 2016 08:45:31 #
I think that is now a trade term! J. R.
silveragemarvel wrote:
I'm contemplating my next camera will be mirrorless. Sony has a6300 in black and chrome. Looks like mine will be black.
Jun 15, 2016 08:47:24 #
wingclui44
Loc: CT USA
SharpShooter wrote:
I'll bet there has not been a brass body made in 50 years so how can they "brass"?!
Or are you referring to the old dinosaur cameras???
SS
Or are you referring to the old dinosaur cameras???
SS
SS. I still have the Canon FTb bought used years ago for my daughter using in college, it looks like brass after some paint came off the edge. You know about Canon more than I. Is it really made from brass?
Jun 15, 2016 08:52:53 #
wingclui44
Loc: CT USA
SharpShooter wrote:
Com'n K9, don't you know anything about composition?!?!
Two just won't work, you gotta have 3!!!
SS
Two just won't work, you gotta have 3!!!
SS
I have three!
Jun 15, 2016 09:00:51 #
silveragemarvel wrote:
I've aways liked the black camera bodies but over time the edges tend to wear leading to "brassing". Most chrome body cameras do not have this issue. What are your preference and why for selecting one over the other? I know that at one time the pro's primarily use black and many non-pro's wanted to look the part.
I don't know if "brassing" will happen over time, but I think that Canon has mitigated this problem by not using metal lugs and metal clips on straps. My Canon F-1 which I used for 30+ years has sidnifigant brassing. Plus it also has any number of scratches and dings on the base. (but the fd glass is still perfect).
Jun 15, 2016 09:03:35 #
JohnSwanda wrote:
The camera makers knew that pros and those who wanted to look like pros liked them better, so they could charge more for them.
Yes, it's been said many times: BLACK BODIES MATTER.
Jun 15, 2016 09:05:05 #
Mike D. wrote:
I read an article recently where a tourist had the strap cut off of their camera bag and the thief took off with the whole ball of wax. To steal someone's memories, that's pretty low.
Some straps have a steel cord inside to prevent that.
Jun 15, 2016 09:18:58 #
When the brass shows thru it shows that you actually USE the camera. Makes you look more professional. Chrome makes you look like a sissy.
Jun 15, 2016 09:20:56 #
SharpShooter wrote:
I'll bet there has not been a brass body made in 50 years so how can they "brass"?!
Or are you referring to the old dinosaur cameras???
SS
Or are you referring to the old dinosaur cameras???
SS
I think he is. My Canon F1 shows a little. Gives it CLASS.
Jun 15, 2016 09:27:24 #
Back in the '70's, I had my Miranda G (aka: the poor man's Nikon F) black chromed.
Really nice finish and probably more durable than paint.
Really nice finish and probably more durable than paint.
Jun 15, 2016 09:30:00 #
SharpShooter wrote:
I'll bet there has not been a brass body made in 50 years so how can they "brass"?!
Or are you referring to the old dinosaur cameras???
SS
Or are you referring to the old dinosaur cameras???
SS
The term "brassing" actually has nothing to do with brass. Rather it is the term used to describe the bright rub marks on the silvery cameras. Don't ask me where it originated or why, but it is a convenient universal short hand way to describe those bright rub marks
Jun 15, 2016 09:37:30 #
SharpShooter wrote:
I'll bet there has not been a brass body made in 50 years so how can they "brass"?!
Or are you referring to the old dinosaur cameras???
SS
Or are you referring to the old dinosaur cameras???
SS
Yes, unlike aluminum film SLR cameras it is hard to photograph dinosaurs with new cameras, the black polycarbonate scares them off.
Jun 15, 2016 09:41:25 #
silveragemarvel wrote:
I've aways liked the black camera bodies but over time the edges tend to wear leading to "brassing". Most chrome body cameras do not have this issue. What are your preference and why for selecting one over the other? I know that at one time the pro's primarily use black and many non-pro's wanted to look the part.
I've never really cared. My Canon FX and New F1 were chrome. My Nikkormat and Nikon FTns were chrome. My FM was chrome. My F3s were black. My D100 and D70 were black. My Canon 20D, 30D, 40D, and 50D were black. My LUMIX GH4 kit is black...
Jun 15, 2016 09:50:18 #
mas24
Loc: Southern CA
Mike D. wrote:
I read an article recently where a tourist had the strap cut off of their camera bag and the thief took off with the whole ball of wax. To steal someone's memories, that's pretty low.
Tourists have been warned in some places in Italy, not to stand relaxed with their camera gear close to the curb of the road. Motorcyclists drive up close to the curb with a passenger sitting behind and they scoop up your gear pack. Gone.
Jun 15, 2016 09:53:04 #
lamiaceae wrote:
Yes, unlike aluminum film SLR cameras it is hard to photograph dinosaurs with new cameras, the black polycarbonate scares them off.
Jun 15, 2016 11:00:04 #
wj cody
Loc: springfield illinois
Mogul wrote:
That's not a dinosaur; it's a classic. Some cameras are actually more valuable if they have an appropriate amount of brassing in the right areas; in particular, some Leica I's and II's are less valuable in pristine condition because collectors are wary of refurbished goods.
you are correct in your post. heavily used and worn black leicas command a premium price due to their original condition. there are a lot of "repaints" out there. some very good and some not so good. my m4 is a black body, worn, and it is less noticable which i appreciate for the work i do with it. i've taped over all the leica engraving to make it even less noticeable. the f2 titanium i have, paired with the noct nikkor is, of course, black and nice and dull. meanwhile, i really like the chrome leicas and the chrome lenses - much nicer than my black finished ones!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.