Wellhiem wrote:
I think I agree, but I'm not 100% sure about what you're saying. If you're saying that none of this explains how human intelligence came about, then yes I agree. The trouble is, human intelligence, isn't tangible. It doesn't leave any fossil record that can be studied. We can trace it back through writings, cave paintings and even flint tools. But before that, we tend to hit a wall.
So then, at the very least there must be intelligence on the other side of the wall. Yes?