Tokina 11-20 f/2.8 for Nikon DX format
May 12, 2016 13:57:01 #
dsiner
Loc: Kent, WA
Anyone have any experience with this lens? I have upcoming trips to Alaska and Grand Canyon, Bryce, Zion, Arches, Canyonlands and Capital Reef national parks.
May 12, 2016 14:03:22 #
dsiner wrote:
Anyone have any experience with this lens? I have upcoming trips to Alaska and Grand Canyon, Bryce, Zion, Arches, Canyonlands and Capital Reef national parks.
This Tokina 11-20mm f/2.8 is optically superb, it's built tougher than any Nikon or Canon APS-C ultrawide, and it's faster. Enough said?
I am a Tokina fan I have the Tokina 16-28mm 2.8 and love it.
Craig
May 12, 2016 14:36:43 #
May 13, 2016 06:54:14 #
CraigFair wrote:
I have the 11-16mm and have been very happy. It's slightly cheaper, too!This Tokina 11-20mm f/2.8 is optically superb, it's built tougher than any Nikon or Canon APS-C ultrawide, and it's faster. Enough said?
I am a Tokina fan I have the Tokina 16-28mm 2.8 and love it.
Craig
I am a Tokina fan I have the Tokina 16-28mm 2.8 and love it.
Craig
May 13, 2016 07:35:15 #
mikeroetex wrote:
I have the 11-16mm and have been very happy. It's slightly cheaper, too!
Agreed. Several reviews suggest the 11-20 might be a bit sharper. But I absolutely love the 11-16. So much so that I see no reason to spend the extra money for an additional 4mm in length.
May 13, 2016 09:47:19 #
After a lot of research on the Tokina and the Sigma, I elected to go with the Sigma 10-20mm. Never regretted it. Both are good lenses!
May 13, 2016 15:44:05 #
May 13, 2016 15:59:07 #
Jim Bob wrote:
Agreed. Several reviews suggest the 11-20 might be a bit sharper. But I absolutely love the 11-16. So much so that I see no reason to spend the extra money for an additional 4mm in length.
Hey Jim Bob what camera do you use the 11-16mm on.
I have the 16-28mm f/2.8 I use on my FF D800E.
Craig
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.