ILFarmer wrote:
I believe the FZ 200 is a pretty good camera, but the replacement, which is the F Z 300 is quite a bit better.
and almost double in price. FZ300 has a better viewfinder, 4K if you need it recording, water and dust resistant. I find a FZ200 more than sufficent for my needs and if I was going to spend that range of cash I would jump at a FZ1000. Either way it is what you need and what you can afford. There are a few opinions in the Panasonic blog where a FZ300 was bought after selling a FZ200 and the gentleman was trying to sell the FZ300 to go back to the 200.....just saying