innershield wrote:
I am in the market for a new laptop to use with photo shop. It was suggested to get one with the Intel i7 processor. Just asking experts here at the hog, is the i7 the best for photo shop. Thanks
My suggestion would be to not get a laptop, but instead get a desktop.
Photo editing on a laptop is problematic for several reasons.
First, you move around with a laptop, working in different lighting conditions, closing and reopening the computer so the screen angle changes. As a result, it's difficult to calibrate a laptop for consistent color and brightness. Ideally, you should run calibration on a laptop after every move... And since that should only be done after a screen has had about half an hour to warm up and then takes about 10 or 15 minutes... would sort of defeat the whole point of a laptop. (In comparison, I re-calibrate my desktop monitor every two months.)
The screen size is quite limited, too. About the largest laptop I've seen has a 21" screen, and that was a big, heavy beast! I have a 17" and it's pretty hefty too! My desktop has a graphics-quality 24" IPS screen... that I sometime wish was larger.
One solution is to use a laptop with an external monitor that you set up and keep in the same work space, with controlled lighting and periodic calibration.
But there's now another problem... To run a bigger, external monitor very efficiently, especially for graphics-intensive work such as photo editing in Photoshop, usually requires a graphics card with increased processing power and additional dedicated graphics memory. Some laptops have no means of expanding them beyond the built-in graphics hardware.... Or, those that can be upgraded need a special graphics card that's quite expensive.
Also, Photoshop works a lot better if you can provide it with a "scratch disk" to use, separate from the hard drive for the operating system and program itself. Many laptops can only accommodate a single drive. My 17" has room for a 2nd drive, which I've installed... but I just use it for storage and, once again, that makes for a bigger, heavier laptop. Running a second internal drive also greatly shortens usable battery life. I get about 45 minutes max... so have to plug in pretty much all the time.
Also, more and more laptops are using Solid State Drives instead of "old-fashioned" spinning disks. SSDs are cool and fast, sure... But they aren't up to the archiving standards for long term storage of image files. A friend of mine is an engineer and upper management manufacturing engineer at one of the largest manufacturers of SSDs and hard drives... and he tells me they simply aren't ready yet to trust with anything that's not easily replaced or securely backed up elsewhere. Not to mention, a friend of mine had her laptop stolen while traveling in Spain.... lost many years worth of photos!
Way too risky for me!
All in all, there are a lot of reasons that a desktop computer is a better choice for serious photo editing. I don't even have Photoshop installed on my laptop... I do have Lightroom on it (as well as on my desktop), but mostly just organize and only ever do a little light, quick editing with that... maybe previews with a client or some on-location sorting, renaming, keywording, etc.... and always pass all "real" finishing work off to Lightroom and Photoshop on my desktop in a more controlled, secure environment.
P.S. My Windows desktop and
two Windows laptops (17" I use for location photo work and 15" that clients can use to monitor the work) all cost me less than one reasonably powerful Apple laptop costs! Apple stuff is great... I used some of it a lot in the past. But, it's expensive, there just isn't anywhere near the selection of software available for it, and I really haven't found Windows stuff any less reliable.