nakkh wrote:
http://www.thenation.com/article/wisconsins-voter-id-law-could-block-300000-registered-voters-from-the-polls/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
Johnny Randle, a 74-year-old African-American resident of Milwaukee, moved to Wisconsin from Mississippi in 2011, the same year the state legislature passed a law requiring a government-issued photo ID to cast a ballot. Randle, with the help of his daughter, petitioned the DMV to issue him a free ID for voting because he could not afford to pay for his Mississippi birth certificate.
After a five-month adjudication process, the DMV denied his request. His daughter ultimately tracked down his Mississippi birth certificate, but the name listed, Johnnie Marton Randall, did not match the name hed used his entire life, Johnny Martin Randle. The DMV said that he would either need to correct his name through the Social Security Administration and get a new Social Security card reflecting the name on his birth certificate or go to court to change his name and provide court documents reflecting that your name has legally been changed to read as Johnny M Randle. But Randle worried that any change to his Social Security information might interrupt the monthly disability payments he survives on. (This account comes from a new lawsuit challenging Wisconsins voting restrictions filed by Democratic lawyer Marc Elias, Hillary Clintons campaign counsel.)
http://www.thenation.com/article/wisconsins-voter-... (
show quote)
It's the law! Written and enacted by elected legislative officials in accordance with the state constitution and bill of rights. Your example is worthwhile only in that it represents the "unintended consequences" of law making. This ax swings both ways. Typical governmental screw up. OK now lets talk the screw ups in the AHCA?