I'd like second body too, with the same mind I have now.... :mrgreen:
Skip the m3. Despite being able to use your existing lenses, the slow af will drive you bonkers. Consider a Sony a6300/6000 or Olympus em10ii or a bridge camera.
CLF wrote:
I am starting to save up for another body to go with my Canon T6s. I realize another T6s would be a good choice but have also considered a Canon M3 or another mirror-less body. Since I want to keep EF operating I would prefer the converter to attach my EF lens to the new body would maintain all the electronic capability I get with the T6s. I also do not want to lose a F stop on the low end. F6.3 is slow enough without making it smaller by adding glass in the converter. I have also looked at the 70D and 80D for obvious reasons.
Any input plus or minus to the mirror-less solution would be very helpful. I am looking to make this purchase around July this year, so if Canon usually reduces its inventory at a specific time of the year would also be helpful.
Thanks for the help I always get from this web site.
Greg
I am starting to save up for another body to go wi... (
show quote)
You have a number of lenses with Canon mounts - you should stay with Canon unless you want to get rid of your lenses. For a second body - used, refurbished and KEH are excellent choices... make sure you get the shutter counts on used cameras..
If you plan to use the two cameras at the same time, with different lenses mounted and switching back and forth between them quickly, I'd recommend a second T6s. It's not fun to use two different models that way and leads to mistakes because of differences in the controls. I shoot a lot of sports and have been using two or three identical APS-C models this way and for this reason (over the years those have been 30D, 50D, 7D and now 7DII).
However, if you are planning to use the cameras separately and in less frantic shooting situations, there's also a strong argument for a different model that complements what you have now, giving you additional features over your current camera. Still, it is best when they share memory cards, batteries and have reasonably similar controls. For example, I also use a full frame model and have stuck with 5D-series that have similar controls, share batteries and memory with my APS-C cameras.
I believe T6s uses similar controls and design to 60D, 70D, 80D and 6D. 80D is getting some new video-related features and the full frame 6D is one of the best for low light/high ISO.
I agree that it would probably be best to stick with Canon, so that you can best utilize your current lenses.
I don't use any mirrorless models, so have no idea how they might compare.
I've been looking for a 2nd body for over 30 years. Still making it with the original!! LOL
What do you shoot? That will influence your choices.
Mark
CLF wrote:
I am starting to save up for another body to go with my Canon T6s. I realize another T6s would be a good choice but have also considered a Canon M3 or another mirror-less body. Since I want to keep EF operating I would prefer the converter to attach my EF lens to the new body would maintain all the electronic capability I get with the T6s. I also do not want to lose a F stop on the low end. F6.3 is slow enough without making it smaller by adding glass in the converter. I have also looked at the 70D and 80D for obvious reasons.
Any input plus or minus to the mirror-less solution would be very helpful. I am looking to make this purchase around July this year, so if Canon usually reduces its inventory at a specific time of the year would also be helpful.
Thanks for the help I always get from this web site.
Greg
I am starting to save up for another body to go wi... (
show quote)
CLF
Loc: Raleigh, NC
moonhawk wrote:
I'd like second body too, with the same mind I have now.... :mrgreen:
That gave me a BIG Belly laugh. I needed it today. Thanks.
Greg
CLF
Loc: Raleigh, NC
markngolf wrote:
I've been looking for a 2nd body for over 30 years. Still making it with the original!! LOL
What do you shoot? That will influence your choices.
Mark
We all need a new body, no refurbs, please. :roll: :roll:
I currently shoot wildlife, flowers, landscapes, items that tend to like a cropped sensor. I will not be able to buy anything until July/August and at that time I will be getting another T6s or maybe, and that is a big maybe the 80D. I am trying to maintain commonality between my primary and 2nd body so the 2nd body doesn't become a safe queen. With 2 identical bodies that should not happen. I have eliminated all the mirror less makes for the reason mentioned above.
That is about it, thanks for offering help in my decision.
Greg
Just curious about why you chose the tamron 24-70 versus sigma or canon?
Thank you
Just curious about why you chose the tamron 24-70 versus sigma or canon?
Thank you
CLF
Loc: Raleigh, NC
Dr.CalebRodriguez wrote:
Just curious about why you chose the tamron 24-70 versus sigma or canon?
Thank you
I found this lens at a local shop and out the door it was $75. I bought it and it turns out to be pretty darn good optics. Could be sharper but for that amount of money I could use it or just let it collect dust.
Greg
CHG_CANON wrote:
Greg - what do you want to accomplish with a second body? As a back up, my observation is cameras do not break / fail that often so you might end up by an 'insurance body' you never use. If as an upgrade, well then your older camera will become the little used back-up making it an investment with no purpose. To try new technology? Then why buy? Rent one instead. Mirrorless has not taken over the market as had / has been predicted. Try it via a rental, see what you think without making the full investment.
After doing the 'keep old as back-up' track twice, both times I found I never used the second body and just eventually sold. But, when I got two bodies exactly the same and set-up the same, I use them both actively, switching per outing and shooting together when covering events.
Greg - what do you want to accomplish with a secon... (
show quote)
Makes good sense. When I decided to switch to MILC, I bought a Sony a6000. It has proven to be every bit as good to use as my Nikons. So I ordered an a6300 which has some serious advances. I looked at Canon and Nikon, but I think both have missed the MILC boat. They use smaller sensors like so-called 1 inch (An industry wide lie.) rather than the aps-c. And they refused to put a viewfinder on the camera.
I looked at the others, but the Sony has so much more going for it. (Fuji would be in second place.)
Fortunately the alphas are reasonable in cost, otherwise I would have rented.
If your looking for a second body that is a little lighter - try the SL1. I'll carry 2 or more cameras at all day sports events, by Sunday afternoon all I can carry is the SL1. I have had fantastic results and it is a Rebel like your T6 so it should be similar. They have gone down in price - and/or you can usually get a great deal on ebay.
I have never used a mirrorless - sorry I can't help you there. But that might a fun second camera too.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.