Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Don't believe everything you see on the news
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Mar 29, 2016 12:47:36   #
Nelson.I Loc: Monument, Colorado, USA
 
CA_CanonUser wrote:
I was interviewed for the local TV news several years ago (when they used film cameras) and the asked me 6 questions. I provided 6 answers. That evening they had cut and spliced such that they aired questions 1 and 5 along with answers 3 and 6. So even then they could "make the news" say whatever they wanted. Never trust a news interview where the interviewer and interviewee are not in the scene together!!

You're correct.

Reply
Mar 29, 2016 12:50:04   #
Nelson.I Loc: Monument, Colorado, USA
 
dcampbell52 wrote:
Ahh, public radio is biased too. They tend to report the news with what ever slant THEY want to put on it or if it doesn't fit their agenda, they just don't report it. They are no better and no worse than any other news service.

I trust NPR more than I trust main stream news organizations. Show me a lie that they've told.

PS - I support NPR through my local public radio station. If NPR lies and I catch wind of it, they lose my support.

Reply
Mar 29, 2016 12:54:18   #
One Rude Dawg Loc: Athol, ID
 
ole sarg wrote:
I wonder what crest toothpaste's agenda is or for that matter any advertiser?

All this nonsense about agendas is just that nonsense. Do you think an advertising salesperson for a network goes into a dark room and says to the client: "Just how do you want us to present a story on X?"

Be serious!


Are you serious? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
 
 
Mar 29, 2016 13:15:49   #
Duckfart Loc: Olympia, Washington
 
Latent-Image wrote:
A main tool at the "Fox Noise" channel.

A main tool on ALL the channels, including tabloids like CNN and CBS who have been known to make up their own news.

Reply
Mar 29, 2016 13:21:14   #
Nelson.I Loc: Monument, Colorado, USA
 
Duckfart wrote:
A main tool on ALL the channels, including tabloids like CNN and CBS who have been known to make up their own news.

Maybe true to an extent; however, FOX remains far and away the leader of outright lying to its audience.

Reply
Mar 29, 2016 13:34:15   #
denoferth Loc: Portsmouth, NH
 
ole sarg wrote:
I wonder what crest toothpaste's agenda is or for that matter any advertiser?

All this nonsense about agendas is just that nonsense. Do you think an advertising salesperson for a network goes into a dark room and says to the client: "Just how do you want us to present a story on X?"

Be serious!


Sorry for the length. I was called away and this session timed out so here's the rest of it.

It is actually quite serious and very simple in this day of mass social media. A wacko is "offended" about something or another, notes what company's are sponsoring it and starts a movement to boycott that product. A Google search will get you the names,address's and sometimes phone numbers of the CEO and board directors that are then spread out to millions of equally motivated activists who email and write letters threatening not only to never use their product ever again but tell everyone they know to do the same. In some circumstances they call/wright their representatives in government who then lean on the companies and you have the EPA, Nader or whomever killing the Corvair. Gun control, save the whales, Peta ads, porpoise in tuna nets, ban cougar hunting in Ca, ban trapping, etc, etc. all run that way. Any company that feels a drop in sales or feels there might be bad advertising will drop sponsoring whatever "offended" the fruitcakes. Perception is reality for those with no critical thinking ability - human caused global warming being only the latest prime example.

Another example pursued on this site would be "drones". Not the real rootin tootin autonomous flying military kind but those toys the ignorant public was taught to believe by an equally ignorant media were actually "drones" and so now they are. The FAA decided over 8 million of the little beasties could be sold during the Christmas season and so they MUST pose a unimaginable hazard to manned aircraft. Something MUST be done! After all, those relatively cheep robots will replace lots and lots of high-paid helicopter pilots and the FAA always did want control of model airplanes anyway. That's why I paid money to be licensed as a genuine FAA approved toy aeroplane driver. Who would have thunk it! Notice now that the government (the FAA) got it's way all the hype suddenly evaporated, including all the "near misses". The old English aeromodler magazines used to have a term for the public at large that I always felt was so very appropriate; instead of "Homosapians" they called them "Homosaps".
denoferth wrote:
It is actually quite serious and very simple in this day of mass social media. A wacko is "offended" about something or another, notes what company's are sponsoring it and starts a movement to boycott that product. A Google search will get you the names,address's and sometimes phone numbers of the CEO and board directors that are then spread out to millions of equally motivated activists who email and write letters threatening not only to never use their product ever again but tell everyone they know to do the same. In some circumstances they call/wright their representatives in government who then lean on the companies and you have the EPA, Nader or whomever killing the Corvair. Gun control, save the whales, Peta ads, porpoise in tuna nets, ban cougar hunting in Ca, ban trapping, etc, etc. all run that way. Any company that feels a drop in sales or feels there might be bad advertising will drop sponsoring whatever "offended" the fruitcakes. Perception is reality for those with no critical thinking ability - human caused global warming being only the latest prime example.
It is actually quite serious and very simple in th... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 29, 2016 13:41:14   #
mdfenton
 
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) is an American non-profit corporation created by an act of the United States Congress and funded by the United States federal government to promote and help support public broadcasting. $26.67 M for PBS support. No private financing. Check Wikipedia.

Reply
 
 
Mar 29, 2016 13:54:02   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
ole sarg wrote:
You have conflated two different issues!

The disclaimers prior to the Congressional Act were a matter of advertising policy but not a matter of news policy!

If memory serves, there were many news reports regarding the ill effects and affects of smoking.

http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/21/2/87.full

in 1953 Life carried a long story on smoking and cancer and cigarette advertising was a major source of income for the mag at that time.

I realize that smoking is bad but then so is driving under the influence, working under the influence etc. All I was saying is that Congress would NOT have outlawed tobacco advertising if the public and doctors hadn't supported it. The Tobacco lobby was contributing heavily to almost everyone's election campaigns and it nearly took an act of God to get anything done. And, if you will remember, up until a few years ago, 1996 to be exact, liquor advertising had been banned on for 60 years on radio and 46 years on television. (NOTE: this does not include wine or beer).

Reply
Mar 29, 2016 14:10:31   #
pecohen Loc: Central Maine
 
ole sarg wrote:
So you are saying that their agenda is not to present the news in a certain manner!

You have just reinforced my point.


Well, say that one of Crest's products is found to be contaminated in some way or perhaps one of Crest's factories is found to have contaminated a water supply. If Crest has been donating to a network, that network might just decide that story is not news-worthy.

Reply
Mar 29, 2016 14:34:06   #
waywest Loc: las vegas
 
no, i was being sarcastic. i like fox news

Reply
Mar 29, 2016 15:28:46   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
Hardly, other stations would carry it. Ever notice how all the news stations carry the same stories. If a station decided not to cover the story it would become a story!

News is a competitive business. Nationally and Internationally it seems that the headlines are the same. Burssels was the lead story world wide.

There is a pretty solid wall between editorial and sales/advertising.


pecohen wrote:
Well, say that one of Crest's products is found to be contaminated in some way or perhaps one of Crest's factories is found to have contaminated a water supply. If Crest has been donating to a network, that network might just decide that story is not news-worthy.

Reply
 
 
Mar 29, 2016 17:07:31   #
FRENCHY Loc: Stone Mountain , Ga
 
waywest wrote:
yeah, it's fox news thats the problem - just ask brian williams


Only NBC ABS CBS are telling the all truth ....Yeah right !!


:lol: :lol:

Reply
Mar 29, 2016 17:26:43   #
denoferth Loc: Portsmouth, NH
 
Nelson.I wrote:
You're correct.


Back in the day when I represented the Trading Post at trade shows in Massachusetts we usually had the biggest display of firearms there. That being the case it wasn't too unusual for some cute young thing from the local TV station with her cameraman in tow to make a beeline to our booth. She would zero in on the bumpkin in the plaid shirt with the beard and you just knew her questions wouldn't be very firearm friendly. I always hoped for the opening where she would ask if we felt responsible for providing the means to kill so I could spring the old line about her having the equipment for prostitution but never got the chance. You are absolutely correct they cut and paste to suite their agenda. Anybody who feels otherwise is living in fairy-tale land.

Reply
Mar 29, 2016 17:30:46   #
SmittyOne Loc: California
 
pipesgt wrote:
You don't know who to believe anymore.

This is a seven minute video. Quite interesting implications.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKkuWX406q4

Not there anymore.



Reply
Mar 29, 2016 18:10:08   #
Croce Loc: Earth
 
dcampbell52 wrote:
Ahh, public radio is biased too. They tend to report the news with what ever slant THEY want to put on it or if it doesn't fit their agenda, they just don't report it. They are no better and no worse than any other news service.


Very biased as a matter of fact. If it has to do with politics in any way it will be very liberally slanted.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.