I know we all have our favorite lenses but I am considering buying a Sigma 18-300 lens for my d 7100.I have a Nikon 55-300 & it's ok but I am wondering if any of you have this 18-300 Sigma & would it benefit me to purchase this even if I have the 55-300? I have read all the specs & it sounds like what I am looking for.I would appreciate any help you can offer concerning the sigma lens.
Marilyng wrote:
I know we all have our favorite lenses but I am considering buying a Sigma 18-300 lens for my d 7100.I have a Nikon 55-300 & it's ok but I am wondering if any of you have this 18-300 Sigma & would it benefit me to purchase this even if I have the 55-300? I have read all the specs & it sounds like what I am looking for.I would appreciate any help you can offer concerning the sigma lens.
FWIW - I do not own that particular lens, however....
I am assuming that it is the f/3.5-6.3 version, which is really not any faster a lens than the 55-300.
BUT it has the range from 18 to 300 in a single lens, making it easier to take along with no need to swap lenses for telephoto or wide.
And it is also a MACRO lens, which counts for something !
You may find an interest in macro shooting at some point and with that lens you would have a good start.
I have several Sigma Lenses and perform well on my D7100.
I have had the Sigma 18-250 lens on a Sony SLT-A65V camera for about two years now and am totally happy with it. I almost never change to another lens. If buying now, I would, of course, buy the Sigma 18-300.
Dngallagher wrote:
FWIW - I do not own that particular lens, however....
I am assuming that it is the f/3.5-6.3 version, which is really not any faster a lens than the 55-300.
BUT it has the range from 18 to 300 in a single lens, making it easier to take along with no need to swap lenses for telephoto or wide.
And it is also a MACRO lens, which counts for something !
You may find an interest in macro shooting at some point and with that lens you would have a good start.
I have several Sigma Lenses and perform well on my D7100.
FWIW - I do not own that particular lens, however.... (
show quote)
Ok good to know & yes I want to get into macro shooting
I have a Nikon D3200 and I'm interested in a fast walk around lens but not sure what to buy any suggestions? I'm new to this so please have patients with me.
Joanne623 wrote:
I have a Nikon D3200 and I'm interested in a fast walk around lens but not sure what to buy any suggestions? I'm new to this so please have patients with me.
It's best to start a new thread rather than add your question to an existing thread.
I have both a 55-300 VR and a Sigma 18-300. The 55-300 is marginally sharper at 300mm, but there isn't a significant difference in an 8x10 print. If you want an all-in-one lens the Sigma 18-300 is a good choice. It is a little heavy at 20 ounces.
The SIgma 18 - 300 is what I carry whenever I am out hiking and do not want to have to deal with changing in the field. Great images, easy to use.
Marilyng wrote:
Ok good to know & yes I want to get into macro shooting
It is not truly a macro lens, in fact it does not come close. The designation that many manufactures put on their zoom lenses is a misnomer, it means that they focus a little closer than some other lenses but they are only capable of "close up" photography not macro photography.
Gene51 wrote:
The Nikon is better.
Yes,I went & checked that lens as well.I love Nikon so if I can find a good deal on eBay I'll buy it,thanks!
MTG44
Loc: Corryton, Tennessee
I have this lens and it performs very well. Good all purpose lens and sharp.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.