Hillary to Get 95% of the Black Vote (Page 4): I don't understand how you can believe he acts like a "weenie" and still support him.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

soba1 wrote:

For the record I just got off the phone with my best friend whom I've known for over 30yrs wow. But anyway I told him I like Trump.
His yeah you're not the first brutha that told me that.
So like I said there are more people than you realize that like him.
Some just won't say it. Also I hope he is sincere because in all likelihood he could be purposely acting like a weenie to make Hillary look more appealing.

I don't understand how you can believe he acts like a "weenie" and still support him.

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

Keenan wrote:

Never thought I'd see a black man support a white racist demagogue. You're an interesting fellow, soba.

He's a smart guy. He's supporting Trump, not hitlery.

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

Kombiguy wrote:

Maybe he's more than just a "black man."

Keenan is very patronizing, just like all the many other liberal racists.

jcs Loc: USA

Keenan wrote:

Never thought I'd see a black man support a white racist demagogue. You're an interesting fellow, soba.

How do you know Soba voted for Clinton in '92 ?

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

thom w wrote:

I don't understand how you can believe he acts like a "weenie" and still support him.

Can't stand the heat, Keenan/green/user/dirtpusher, or whatever the flavor of the month happens to be, eh.

Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

thom w wrote:

I don't understand how you can believe he acts like a "weenie" and still support him.

I might be able to understand how he can support a weenie. But what I can't get my head around is why he would support a racist demagogue whose white supremacist followers would likely exclude soba from their version of a Great America, and would probably look at him with suspicion and disdain were he to show up at a Trump rally.

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

Keenan wrote:

I might be able to understand how he can support a weenie. But what I can't get my head around is why he would support a racist demagogue whose white supremacist followers would likely exclude soba from their version of a Great America, and would probably look at him suspiciously were he to show up at a Trump rally.

You guys have been trying to keep him on the reservation since the sixties!

Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

idaholover wrote:

You guys have been trying to keep him on the reservation since the sixties!

I've only known him for about a year. Perhaps you have me confused with someone else.

Sanford504

jfn007 wrote:

Blacks just do not get it. Democrat Party: Party of the Jim Crow Laws, started the KKK, refused to integrate southern schools (Ike had to use federal troops when Democrat governors refused to integrate their schools.), the party of slavery, and the list goes on. A greater percentage of Republicans in the congress voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act than did Democrats.

I do not understand how Black voters can continue to support the party that gave us the likes of Senator Byrd (former KKK Grand Wizard), William Fulbright ( arch segregationist) and many many more congressmen who were vehemently opposed to any and all equal rights for ALL Americans. It was the democrats who were vehemently opposed to voter rights that would overturn racist voting rules that once required Black voters to take a reading test that had questions such as: "How many bubbles in a bar of soap," "What is the forth line in the Declaration of Independence," etc, etc, It was the Democratic party that opposed full integration of the Military as well as public schools! In spite of Trump's faults, I am one black voter who fervently hopes and prays he will become our next President!!!!!
:thumbup:

skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA

Keenan wrote:

I might be able to understand how he can support a weenie. But what I can't get my head around is why he would support a racist demagogue whose white supremacist followers would likely exclude soba from their version of a Great America, and would probably look at him with suspicion and disdain were he to show up at a Trump rally.

So, K, did you watch the video I linked on the previous page?

It shows MSNBC trying to race bait just like you tend to do, and getting their ass handed to them by a BLACK MAN AT A TRUMP RALLY. Kind of makes your racism insignificant...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nolbmguzvGk

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado

Sanford504 wrote:

I do not understand how Black voters can continue ... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Kombiguy Loc: Cedar Rapids, IA

Keenan wrote:

Reason? Can you show me where you used reason, rather than bullshit logic and false accusation of racism? I must have missed that.

by the way, you shouldn't use terms when you don't know their meaning. Look up "ad hominem" in the dictionary. I did not use ad hominems. You need to get your terms straight. Accurately describing a bullshit argument as such is not ad hominem. Ad hominem is to the person, not the argument.

Keep studying. You'll get there sooner or later!

Kombiguy Loc: Cedar Rapids, IA

Keenan wrote:

Reason? Can you show me where you used reason, rather than bullshit logic and false accusation of racism? I must have missed that.

Yes, you did. Here, let's look at it logically:

You said: "Never thought I'd see a black man support a white racist demagogue."

Syllogistically, this breaks out as:

P) All black men should oppose Trump

S) Soba is a black man

C) Soba should oppose Trump

The syllogism appears valid on it's face. It fails, however, to be correct.
That could be because your terms are incorrect or your premises are incorrect.
We can plainly see that your secondary term is correct, so the fault must lie elsewhere.
Looking at your primary term, we see you make two unproven assumptions, which results in a
failure of your statement.
The first unproven assumption is that Trump is a racist, specifically, given the context,
racist against blacks.
Your second unproven assumption is that all black men view Trump identically, and
therefore should behave in a particular and universal way.
Those assumptions result in a syntactically valid but incorrect syllogism.

skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA

Wow. I have never seen "You're an idiot" phrased so articulately.
I'm sure it's wasted on him but thanks anyway.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Keenan wrote:

Idiot, you just made a complete fool of yourself. You obviously didn't read the article, did you? If you had bothered to read instead of jumping the gun and falsely assuming shit, you wouldn't have put you foot in your mouth.

There was no disruption. They were standing there silently. Fool.

Oh wait! Maybe I jumped the gun. Maybe you already knew they were standing there silently, and the FACT that they were black is why you labeled it disruptive.

Ummmm...NO! it was YOU that didn't read the article...the Officer in the article said that group of people were ejected because of their foul language and were NOT throw own because they were black. Why were not all the other black Americans thrown out? Keenan, you are revealing who the true racist is...and that would be YOU!