Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Climate Change
Page <<first <prev 8 of 10 next> last>>
May 8, 2012 10:29:54   #
Roger Hicks Loc: Aquitaine
 
ngc1514 wrote:
I find a certain frisson of humor in the thought that we are all breathing in a few molecules of dinosaur farts with each inhalation. Even the Creationists.


Dear Eric,

Ah, but those were CREATED dinosaur farts, not EVOLUTIONARY dinosaur farts.

As Sir Terry Pratchett pointed out, God created fossils, but they are a joke nobody has got yet...

Cheers,

R.

Reply
May 8, 2012 10:33:08   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
Roger Hicks wrote:
ngc1514 wrote:
Found the full 20 volume OED on CD at a garage sale for $20. Was one of my great garage sale purchases!


Jammy bugger! I thought I did well to get mine for $300. Though mine is, in all fairness, the paper edition, not a CD.

Cheers,

R.


I have the 11 volume set of Durant sitting on the shelf. No room for the 20 volumes of the OED! Besides, it's so simple to cut and paste from the soft version!

Speaking of cutting and pasting (how about THAT for a sudden lane change!), we - the wife, her sister, the brother-in-law and I) were in Washington D.C. last week where the cut and pasted Jeffersonian bible is on display. The biggest miracle we could see was... how did he do it without Scotch tape?!?

Reply
May 8, 2012 10:37:50   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
Roger Hicks wrote:
ngc1514 wrote:
I find a certain frisson of humor in the thought that we are all breathing in a few molecules of dinosaur farts with each inhalation. Even the Creationists.


Dear Eric,

Ah, but those were CREATED dinosaur farts, not EVOLUTIONARY dinosaur farts.

As Sir Terry Pratchett pointed out, God created fossils, but they are a joke nobody has got yet...

Cheers,

R.

AHHH! That explains so much!

"And on the sixth day, around tea time, god created farts. And god smelled the farts and said they were good."

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2012 10:44:13   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
dpullum wrote:
ngc1514 quoted me.... but why. OED denier and modern words do not necessarily have direct connection...

Textile yarns are measured in various units, such as: the denier and tex (linear mass density of fibers). With all do regards to the OED, Old English Dictionary, it is quaint and historic and "Old English." humm it is a tangled web we weave with very fine denier yarns to deceive and capture.

Let me provide the 3rd definition of "denier" from the OED. The first definition is the one about one who denies. As you can see, using denier as a unit of measurement for fabrics is relatively modern and first found in print in 1839 while the definition of one who denies dates back to c. 1400.

denier3

(d&#618;&#712;n&#618;&#601;(r), &#8214;d&#601;nje)

Forms: 5–7 denere, 6 Sc. deneir, 6–7 deneere, 7 deneer, -eare, -ire, -iere, dinneere, 6– denier. See also denar.

[a. OF. dener, later denier (= Pr. dener, denier, dinier, Cat. diner, Sp. dinero, Pg. dinheiro, It. denaro, danaro):—L. d&#275;n&#257;rium: see denarius. The form deneer(e (cf. musketeer, etc.) prevailed about 1600.]

1.1 A French coin, the twelfth of the sou; originally, like the Roman denarius and English penny, of silver; but from 16th c. a small copper coin. Hence (esp. in negative phrases) used as the type of a very small sum. Obs. or arch.
   Originally, from reign of Charlemagne till 12th c., a silver coin of about 22 Troy grains or rather less than a pennyweight; from the 13th c. to the reign of Chas. IX (d. 1574), usually of billon or base silver (denier tournois), and weighing at different times from 10 to 14 gr.; under Henry III (1574–89) it became a copper coin of about 22 gr. (less than 2/3 of the current bronze farthing), and so continued till the death of Louis XIV. (B. V. Head.)

   c&#8198;1425 Wyntoun Cron. vi. v. 60 To þe kyrk ilka yhere Of Rome he heycht a denere To pay (a penny þat is to say).    1580 H. Gifford Gilloflowers (1875) 132 And in his purse, to serue his neede, Not one deneere he had.    1594 Shakes. Rich. III, i. ii. 252 My Dukedome to a Beggerly denier! I do mistake my person all this while.    1607 T. Walkington Opt. Glass 45 Then liue in wealth and giue not a dinneere.    1611 Cotgr., Denier a penny, a deneere; a small copper coin valued at the tenth part of an English pennie; also, a pennie-weight, or 24 grains.    a&#8198;1670 Hacket Abp. Williams i. (1692) 104 The Lord Treasurer, I know well, had&#8229;not drawn a denier out of the King's purse.    1706 Phillips (ed. Kersey), Denier, a French Brass-Coin, worth three Tenths of an English Farthing, of which Twelve make a Sols. Also a Penny-weight in Silver; thus an Ounce of Silver&#8229;is of 24 Deniers.    1873 Hale In His Name vi. 55 A slave whom I have bought with my deniers.    1876 Browning Pacchiarotto 79 Let the blind mole mine Digging out deniers!

†2.2 Used to translate Lat. d&#275;n&#257;rius: see denarius 1. Obs.

   1598 R. Grenewey Tacitus' Ann. i. v. (1622) 9 The Pretorian bands, which receiued two deniers a day.    1606 Holland Sueton. 66 Gallus his scribe, had receiued 500 deniers.

†3.3 A pennyweight; = denarius 3. Obs.

   1601 Holland Pliny II. 79 Take of wild running Thyme the weight of two deniers&#8229;Ervil floure twelue deniers or drams.    a&#8198;1656 Ussher Ann. (1658) 229 Counting here, as his manner everywhere is, a deneere, for a drachma.    1706 [see sense 1 above].

4.4 A unit of weight used to estimate the fineness of silk, rayon, or nylon yarn.
   The unit is based on a length of 450 metres of yarn weighing 0·05 gramme.

   1839 Ure Dict. Arts 1105 The first of these raw silks will have a titre of 20 to 24 deniers.    1858 Simmonds Dict. Trade, Denier,&#8229;in Italy, a small weight equal to about a grain, by which silk is weighed.    1887 Colonial & Indian Exhib., Rep. Col. Sect. 341 The general sizes [of silk] seem to be 16 to 20 deniers, but it will range from about 10 to 24 deniers, single thread.    1927 T. Woodhouse Artifical Silk 78 Finally the hanks are weighed&#8229;to ascertain the denier count.    1952 Sunday Times 15 June 8/5 Denier is the thickness of the yarn: the lower the denier number, the finer the stocking.    1957 Times 30 Sept. 11/3 The makers claim that these 15-denier ‘Carefree’ nylons will outlast several ordinary pairs.    1960 Textile Terms & Defs. (ed. 4) 53 Denier, the weight in grammes of 9,000 metres of a filament or yarn. The denier system is used as the standard count for filament silk as well as for rayon, cellulose acetate, nylon and other man-made fibres.

Reply
May 8, 2012 11:11:32   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
I am a Jew and Jews do not believe the Torah is the literal word of God. Jews recognize Torah as a redacted book that is inspired.

We do not partake in the Christian mythology although Christians like to say we do? That Judeo-Christian thing is Christian not Jewish.

Mortimer Adler the great Catholic historian was Jewish. He was asked why he never converted. To which he replied (and I paraphrase): To be a Catholic takes faith.




ngc1514 wrote:
And I thought we were doing so well until you started getting smarmy with your assertion implying my never reading books.
Quote:
Also, what happened after sin entered the world is an excellent explanation for entropy. You might want to "Google" that word. Heaven forfend you would look it up in a book. You can PM if you want and I will explain what they are.
What a silly and absolutely wrong assertion! I'd be happy to send you a copy of my Calibre index of books - all 3499 of them at last count. And that doesn't count there are the other 1500 on the shelves at home or stashed away in our storage locker.

I also notice no answers to my questions about entropy and how life would be possible on the planet IF the planet was a closed system. How would the sun "burn" (and yes, I know enough chemistry to understand the sun is not burning (See Lord Kelvin on the age of the earth), but it does make a pretty picture.

You, of course, are free to engage in silly hand waving by making all sorts of claims based on ancient myth, but I am free to dismiss them as silly.

And then we have a lack on continuity of thought between two of your postings:
Quote:
As for virology, viruses show incredible adaptation but not one scintilla of species changing, not even family changing even given replication millions of times within one cell.

We - you and I - know families are higher in the taxonomic hierarchy than species. Seeing families change would be far less likely than seeing species change. The human family, for example is the hominids - Hominidae. The full classification down to the family level is:

Kingdom - Animalia
Phylum - Chordata
Class - Mammalia
Order - Primates
Family - Hominidae

The same basic taxonomic designation occurs for ALL primates, but no one expects a change between families. The Hominidae will not be evolving into Family Lemuridae (lemurs), for example.

BUT.... in a later message you write:
Quote:
read it carefully. it states changes in families not species.

CHANGES in families? You mean that at the level of viruses, changes in families take place? WOW! That's an even more spectacular evolutionary event than speciation!

But, you might also read the piece more carefully since it is addressing the goal of the study:
Quote:
The main objective of the project RNAVIRSPE was to gain a deeper understanding of the evolutionary processes, as well as the role of relevant genetic and biological factors, leading to 'speciation' (i.e. appearance of new species) in animal and plant RNA viruses, through comparative gene sequence analysis.

How was this goal to be accomplished? Among a list of 4 "aspects" is included:
Quote:
3) Estimate the general frequency of lateral gene transfer in these viral families;

And, in good denier fashion, your last message ends in whining:
Quote:
I think this has gone on long enough. I have been accused of things I didn't say and my religious beliefs have been held to mockery. Something no one would dare to do with Judaism or Islam (for fear of death) but have no compunctions about denigrating Christianity. If it's called bigotry for other religions (hate that word, but the screechers wouldn't understand relationship) why not with Christianity? No more to be said.

Perhaps because Jews and Muslims are not all over the forum world espousing their own mythology as science. Let a Jew or Muslim come on here and claim that the book of Genesis might show how entropy came into the universe or is, in any rational manner a science book, and I guarantee you you'd see the same results.

No more to be said? Sorry to see you go. It's been fun.
And I thought we were doing so well until you star... (show quote)

Reply
May 8, 2012 12:19:07   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
ole sarg wrote:
I am a Jew and Jews do not believe the Torah is the literal word of God. Jews recognize Torah as a redacted book that is inspired.

We do not partake in the Christian mythology although Christians like to say we do? That Judeo-Christian thing is Christian not Jewish.

The majority of Christians also understand the bible is not a science book. It seems only to be an odd fringe group who so profess to a 10,000 year old earth. At least the old earth creationists follow along with where science leads and accept a 14 billion year old universe, a 4.3 billion year old planet and the evolution of life on the planet.

God, to them, created the laws of nature and allowed those laws to perform the heavy lifting. It is a very defensible position, unlike young earth creationism. These old earth creationists are not hot to prove the Noachian Flood (never happened), the Exodus (no evidence it ever happened), the walls of Jericho tumbling down during the conquest of Canaan (never happened).

Only that strange breed of believers in biblical inerrancy feel it necessary that science supports their claims. A claim the bible never makes about itself. No where in the bible will you find a claim that every word in the bible is true.

One of the strangest word usages in Genesis is repeated several times during the creation: "And God saw that it was good."

Huh?

Did god think it would be bad? Good is a value judgement. Against what was he comparing his work so that it was possible to proclaim it good? Was some other god creating another universe and they were competing? Or, as the natural law people will tell you, there is a natural law that transcends god and provided the necessary referential point against which god measured his work.

Or it's all a myth from mankind's youth.

Ya pays yer money and ya takes yer chance.

Reply
May 8, 2012 13:04:33   #
singleviking Loc: Lake Sebu Eco Park, Philippines
 
To NGC1514,
You really need to get more informed. You should subscribe the new cable channels if their available in your local Bible Belt area. Here's a listing:

NETWORK Channel Name

WCRP The Revisionist History Channel

WGOD The NEW Creationist Channel

WPLN The Palin History Channel

WGAY The Bachman Health Channel

Ask your cable provider to supply these truthful and informative networks to your local service.

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2012 13:08:08   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
ngc1514
Again we come back to the meaning of life equaling 42. Indeed the proof of the age of the earth is that it took a long time to compute 42 and even longer to recall what the question was to begin with!
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120508094358.htm The article ties in the upsurge of the population of man based on the Ice Age ending could it be that the Ice Age ended because of mans flatulences and hot air. No mention was made of woman... suggesting that the men found other men to be fond of and that the accelerated slippage of the glaciers was a result of Onanism. And god said it was good. To understand how our Galaxy works I suggest to all they abandon the UHH forum and leave the earth before it is to late.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8z4JAenBPo

Reply
May 8, 2012 13:25:32   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
singleviking wrote:
To NGC1514,
You really need to get more informed. You should subscribe the new cable channels if their available in your local Bible Belt area. Here's a listing:

NETWORK Channel Name

WCRP The Revisionist History Channel

WGOD The NEW Creationist Channel

WPLN The Palin History Channel

WGAY The Bachman Health Channel

Ask your cable provider to supply these truthful and informative networks to your local service.
To NGC1514, br You really need to get more info... (show quote)

At last! Someone has finally shown me the error of my ways. I turned the television off about 25 years ago and rarely turn it back on. If I get 5 hours of viewing in a year, that would be excessive. But if the urge takes over, I'll make sure we get those channels. Is David Irving hosting a Holocaust denial show in WCRP?

So many books and so little time.

Reply
May 8, 2012 13:42:23   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
dpullum wrote:
ngc1514
Again we come back to the meaning of life equaling 42. Indeed the proof of the age of the earth is that it took a long time to compute 42 and even longer to recall what the question was to begin with!
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120508094358.htm The article ties in the upsurge of the population of man based on the Ice Age ending could it be that the Ice Age ended because of mans flatulences and hot air. No mention was made of woman... suggesting that the men found other men to be fond of and that the accelerated slippage of the glaciers was a result of Onanism. And god said it was good. To understand how our Galaxy works I suggest to all they abandon the UHH forum and leave the earth before it is to late.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8z4JAenBPo
ngc1514 br Again we come back to the meaning of li... (show quote)

You make it all so clear! But thanks for the link to the ScienceDaily post. It was interesting.

Unfortunately, the HHGTTG show was never as good as the books. But isn't that always the case? Adams definitely had a way with words:
Quote:
The great ships hung motionless in the air, over every nation on Earth. Motionless they hung, huge, heavy, steady in the sky, a blasphemy against nature. Many people went straight into shock as their minds tried to encompass what they were looking at. The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don’t.

That last sentence cracks me up every time I read it. Of course, as a further indication of my mental problems, I still laugh when Patsy and King Arthur appear over the hilltop with Patsy clacking coconuts together.

Or when Miranda Richardson, as Queen Elizabeth I, tells Edmund Blackadder after he presents her with a boomerang and says,"Ah yes, Ma'am, but it is a very special stick. Because when you throw it away, it comes back!"

The Queen replies, "Well, that's no good, is it; because when *I* throw things away, I don't *want* them to come back!!"

There is no comedy like British comedy.

Reply
May 8, 2012 14:01:34   #
davejann Loc: Portland Oregon
 
the Noachian Flood (never happened)

ngc actually there was a real event that the myth is probably based on and also explains (to me) why Mt. Ararat is located in norther Turkey and not closer to Palestine.

As the last Ice Age ended and sea levels began to rise the Med, being connected to the oceans, rose as well. The Black Sea at that time was a fresh water lake and was significantly lower. At some point, I am not sure exactly when but about 10,000 years ago give or take a few, the water poured over the Bosporus creating one of the most spectacular waterfalls that ever existed and rapid raising the level of the Black Sea. Recent research has shown with remote cameras that there were settlements along the shores of the original sea that were inundated rapidly. Not sure if there were 30 days and 40 night of rain, however :roll: It also explains the myth of Gilgamesh. Obviously, not the whole world, but certainly the world of those bewildered, primitive villagers.

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2012 14:16:34   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
Interesting how ancient people explained or accounted for a flood. Not knowing about the melting ice obviously a God did something.

But how did the flood effect or influence the location of Mt. Ararat? Did it too float like the ark?




davejann wrote:
the Noachian Flood (never happened)

ngc actually there was a real event that the myth is probably based on and also explains (to me) why Mt. Ararat is located in norther Turkey and not closer to Palestine.

As the last Ice Age ended and sea levels began to rise the Med, being connected to the oceans, rose as well. The Black Sea at that time was a fresh water lake and was significantly lower. At some point, I am not sure exactly when but about 10,000 years ago give or take a few, the water poured over the Bosporus creating one of the most spectacular waterfalls that ever existed and rapid raising the level of the Black Sea. Recent research has shown with remote cameras that there were settlements along the shores of the original sea that were inundated rapidly. Not sure if there were 30 days and 40 night of rain, however :roll: It also explains the myth of Gilgamesh. Obviously, not the whole world, but certainly the world of those bewildered, primitive villagers.
the Noachian Flood (never happened) br br ngc act... (show quote)

Reply
May 8, 2012 14:29:17   #
davejann Loc: Portland Oregon
 
But how did the flood effect or influence the location of Mt. Ararat? Did it too float like the ark?

Sarg, As a lad even though I was skeptical about the story, I couldn't understand why the mountain had been placed in a part of the world almost unknown to the writers of the myth. But Ararat is pretty close to the Black Sea and was probably incorporated into the story by refugees. Only a guess but possible I think.

D

Reply
May 8, 2012 14:44:13   #
singleviking Loc: Lake Sebu Eco Park, Philippines
 
Actually guys, Mt Arrarat is located in a very sciesmicly active area between the Asian and African plates. This area could (and I repeat "COULD") have been lower in elevation when the flood took place and risen to new hights through tectonic mechanisms since the flood. I always wondered why the location of the ARC was at so high up on the mountain, but this could explain that. However, that would mean the flood took place long before when the bible says it happened since tectonic shifts of this magnitude take extrordinary amounts of time.

Reply
May 8, 2012 15:12:41   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
davejann wrote:
the Noachian Flood (never happened)

ngc actually there was a real event that the myth is probably based on and also explains (to me) why Mt. Ararat is located in norther Turkey and not closer to Palestine.

As the last Ice Age ended and sea levels began to rise the Med, being connected to the oceans, rose as well. The Black Sea at that time was a fresh water lake and was significantly lower. At some point, I am not sure exactly when but about 10,000 years ago give or take a few, the water poured over the Bosporus creating one of the most spectacular waterfalls that ever existed and rapid raising the level of the Black Sea. Recent research has shown with remote cameras that there were settlements along the shores of the original sea that were inundated rapidly. Not sure if there were 30 days and 40 night of rain, however :roll: It also explains the myth of Gilgamesh. Obviously, not the whole world, but certainly the world of those bewildered, primitive villagers.
the Noachian Flood (never happened) br br ngc act... (show quote)

There is little doubt that local floods became part of legends. If you go back as far as I do in age, I remember watching Saturday morning cartoons that had the Johnstown flood as part of the plot line. Since everything hits Youtube eventually, you can see one starring Mighty Mouse and the Johnstown Flood here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezyyBZ1bfbE

This flood took place in 1889, but was part of children's entertainment more than 50 years later when the Mighty Mouse cartoon was made in the 40s.

The fact that most of the ancient civilizations formed on the banks of rivers and rivers flood offers an easy basis for flood myths, but none of them come close to filling the Genesis tale of the Noachian flood. You and I and most reasonable and rational people understand this. Unfortunately, the biblical inerrantists will insist some huge amount of water came from nowhere, covered the highest mountains in the world and then, just as magically disappeared. The real magic is there is absolutely no geological evidence for such an event. God musta cleaned up his mess.

The waterfall I would have liked to see was the one that filled the entire Mediterranean Basin in only a couple of years. Known as the Zanclean Deluge, the Atlantic poured over the Straits of Gibraltar around 5 million years ago. Too far back to have been seen by our early Hominid ancestors, but it musta been something to watch!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.