Another lens question
Feb 13, 2016 17:16:48 #
jim quist wrote:
what about taking a 2x extender with?
Since his Tamron 16-300mm zoom is f/6.3 at the long end he will lose auto-focus with a 2X teleconverter.
Feb 13, 2016 18:58:51 #
jaycoffman wrote:
I know this has been discussed a lot but I'd appre... (show quote)
I believe the 18/200mm nikkor lens may be used with a 1.4 or 1.7 teleconverter, check the Nikon chart for lenses compatible with a teleconverter. the 18/200 lens will be a good all around lens, and the addition of the teleconverter when needed will give you that extra reach when needed.
Feb 14, 2016 07:01:03 #
Peter W
Loc: Kent, England
Are you sure they are referring to FOCAL length or just overall size of camera/lens combination front to back? Some places do have such a restriction. May be worth checking this out!
Feb 14, 2016 07:09:59 #
I have the nikon 70-200 F4 which is a good lens. If you rent it or buy it you can also rent or buy a Nikon 1.4 TC-E III (teleconverter) which will bring the effective reach to 280mm (you will lose 1 stop so it will become a 5.6). This will be good for daylight shots. In general a TC will not work for lenses that are shorter than 70 mm so check compatibility if you try to use it with a different lens.
Feb 14, 2016 07:41:01 #
That's a very strange restriction. I wonder if they're concerned about the focal length or the length of the lens. A bridge camera would be way over 200mm.
Rent a lens for the trip.
Rent a lens for the trip.
Feb 14, 2016 08:03:21 #
jaycoffman wrote:
I know this has been discussed a lot but I'd appre... (show quote)
Jay, I think that they may be looking for the FF, pro style camera and the long lens, such as 100-400, or huge prime 200+mm. I really don't think they'll give your 16-300 a serious look. It's compact enough, when fully retracted, to not merit their attention. So many tourists have a crop sensor dslr with a similar zoom that your current setup shouldn't be a problem.
I use a Canon 70d and the very same Tamron 16-300 when traveling light. It is, essentially, the same type of camera/lens combo as yours.
However, you don't want to chance it. Do you have any other lens? If not, the may be a great time to get a faster zoom, or prime, that can be a fall back in case they take issue.
Feb 14, 2016 08:44:52 #
Yes, nowadays certain events, especially international sports events, restrict the lens you are allowed to take into the arena. I went to the WTA finals events in Singapore last October and they have the same rule of 200mm maximum, otherwise they can take the lens off you at their discretion, and give back to you when you leave.
On the other hand, if you take a P&S with a big zoom, they don't seem to be so agitated !
On the other hand, if you take a P&S with a big zoom, they don't seem to be so agitated !
Feb 14, 2016 09:39:43 #
I have the Tamron 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 Di II and have been very pleased with it. It got a good review in PopPhoto, FWIW. And I think it's better than the 18-270 I had previously. $250ish at B&H. Be sure to get the latest version - not the XR at $190.
Feb 14, 2016 10:15:20 #
Here's some recent information. Be sure to read the note at the bottom:
http://www.intltravelnews.com/2015/01/no-tripods-machu-picchu
I also was thinking I'd much rather bring my 16-35 VR. For this one I might also consider 24-85VR. I don't see a need for long lenses on these type of subjects. My 28-300 is OK for general stuff but not as sharp as the above and weighs about the same as the 16-35...i.e. a lot. And I wouldn't want to change lenses in such a place.
I never bring a tripod on such tours anyway...those who do annoy others. I hope they also have rule on selfie sticks.
PS: I can fit my camera and 28-300 into a relatively small camera case. If I thought I needed it I'd bring the camera in that or in my day pack. I doubt they'd take the time to inspect.
PSS: At least they don't charge a fee for anyone wishing to take pictures. I ran into that at the House of Parliament in Bucharest and a discussion on UHH revealed that you'll even find places in California that do that.
http://www.intltravelnews.com/2015/01/no-tripods-machu-picchu
I also was thinking I'd much rather bring my 16-35 VR. For this one I might also consider 24-85VR. I don't see a need for long lenses on these type of subjects. My 28-300 is OK for general stuff but not as sharp as the above and weighs about the same as the 16-35...i.e. a lot. And I wouldn't want to change lenses in such a place.
I never bring a tripod on such tours anyway...those who do annoy others. I hope they also have rule on selfie sticks.
PS: I can fit my camera and 28-300 into a relatively small camera case. If I thought I needed it I'd bring the camera in that or in my day pack. I doubt they'd take the time to inspect.
PSS: At least they don't charge a fee for anyone wishing to take pictures. I ran into that at the House of Parliament in Bucharest and a discussion on UHH revealed that you'll even find places in California that do that.
Feb 14, 2016 10:18:52 #
ballsafire
Loc: Lafayette, Louisiana
jaycoffman wrote:
I know this has been discussed a lot but I'd appre... (show quote)
The restriction is wrong and would discourage me from going on that kind of trip. It is taking your freedom away - your right to see and I take issue with that concept. Or just get a bridge camera with a long reaching lens for example Sony HX 100 v.
Feb 14, 2016 10:20:41 #
ballsafire wrote:
The restriction is wrong and would discourage me from going on that kind of trip. It is taking your freedom away - your right to see and I take issue with that concept. Or just get a bridge camera with a long reaching lens for example Sony HX 100 v.
Machu Pichu gets crowded. They are seeking courtesy to all visitors. Alas some clods use tripods, selfie sticks, and big lenses without due consideration of others.
Yes, by all means do not go.
Feb 14, 2016 10:33:15 #
Mark7829
Loc: Calfornia
jaycoffman wrote:
I know this has been discussed a lot but I'd appre... (show quote)
Buy or rent a good 70-200 f/2.8 and then carry a 1.4 or 1.7 Teleconverter. The 1.7 TC will give you 370 mm at f/4.76 the 1.4 will give you 240 mm at f/3.92. If you got a 2.0 TC you could go farther but not recommended due to loss in IQ.
Feb 14, 2016 10:50:30 #
Feb 14, 2016 10:59:12 #
I wonder if they would recognize a 200mm lens with an extender on it? If you could rent something like an 18-200mm lens and a 1.4x or 2x extender that works with it, you would have your full range throughout the trip. The extender can fit in your pocket.
Feb 14, 2016 11:02:04 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.