jerryc41 wrote:
Funny, but yesterday someone was considering getting a Nikon 16-35mm, and that got me reading reviews and wondering if need one. If only they made the IS lens in f/2.8. IS isn't quite as important on a wide angle lens, but still, it doesn't hurt to have it. If it were me, I would go for the f/2.8. I like that large opening.
Through this whole process I have been wondering why the don't offer a f/2.8 with IS :?