Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
RV Fire At Gas Station and Fire Department Response
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jan 31, 2016 16:16:02   #
skylinefirepest Loc: Southern Pines, N.C.
 
Wow, totally unacceptable time to get the first water on the fire. Response time for a volunteer unit was excellent but then they sat and watched it burn for another five minutes before making the attack. From setting the air brakes and engaging pump gear to stretching hose and charging the line should have taken well less than a minute.

Reply
Jan 31, 2016 16:23:35   #
Jay Pat Loc: Round Rock, Texas, USA
 
I think it was 3min and 45 seconds from when the first firetruck pulled up in the intersection till they had a hose on the fire.
I don't know if the firetruck was a tanker or not.
Did they have to hook up to a fire hydrant?
How many sections of hose did they have to use and hook up?
Hoses must snake around. Can't kink the hose.
How many couplings were involved?
Traffic control, no driving cars over the hose.
Firemen probably don't move very fast for their own safety.
No tripping!
I'm not a fireman.

Reply
Jan 31, 2016 17:02:47   #
skylinefirepest Loc: Southern Pines, N.C.
 
The lines are pre-connected and the fire attack should have been started on the water in the truck...and the first truck should have been an engine not a tanker. Then while the attack is being made and other units are arriving they run a line to a hydrant, block the road, etc. The first in engine parks catty angle to the road which blocks it very effectively and gives the engineer a protected environment to operate from. The attack line is deployed un-charged which makes it quick and easy. Once the line is charged then it makes it more difficult to manuever hence the two men on the line.
I'm a twenty five year volunteer at a station that dropped it's ISO rating from a nine to a six with a portable water supply...meaning that we didn't have enough hydrants in our operating area. We were the first in the state of North Carolina to do that! I drive our two thousand gallon tanker which has a deluge gun, a trash line, two pre-connects and a thousand gpm pump. It's fifty thousand pounds of firefighting perfection. And I expect that it's going to be retired about the time that I am since it's now over twenty years old. Our newest engine is a cafs engine that is the latest in firefighting. I love it but I'm getting old...

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2016 17:06:55   #
Jay Pat Loc: Round Rock, Texas, USA
 
skylinefirepest wrote:
The lines are pre-connected and the fire attack should have been started on the water in the truck...and the first truck should have been an engine not a tanker. Then while the attack is being made and other units are arriving they run a line to a hydrant, block the road, etc. The first in engine parks catty angle to the road which blocks it very effectively and gives the engineer a protected environment to operate from. The attack line is deployed un-charged which makes it quick and easy. Once the line is charged then it makes it more difficult to manuever hence the two men on the line.
I'm a twenty five year volunteer at a station that dropped it's ISO rating from a nine to a six with a portable water supply...meaning that we didn't have enough hydrants in our operating area. We were the first in the state of North Carolina to do that! I drive our two thousand gallon tanker which has a deluge gun, a trash line, two pre-connects and a thousand gpm pump. It's fifty thousand pounds of firefighting perfection. And I expect that it's going to be retired about the time that I am since it's now over twenty years old. Our newest engine is a cafs engine that is the latest in firefighting. I love it but I'm getting old...
The lines are pre-connected and the fire attack sh... (show quote)


Thanks for the insight!
Pat

Reply
Jan 31, 2016 18:23:03   #
Wenonah Loc: Winona, MN
 
wetnwld wrote:
The fire department is a volunteer unit, as stated in the video. That means that someone has to call the fire number to report. The person in the station, or possibly at his kitchen table, then has to get on the radio to get the call out to the volunteers who are at home, doing whatever they are doing if its a weekend. Or worse, its a weekday and they are at work. The truck personel have to drop everything and get to the station and start her up. I assume some of the volunteers have their gear ready and head straight to the scene. How many minutes till the truck leaves? The station is 3 miles away. At 60 MPH, thats three minutes, they wont get there in three minutes because of safe driving. They arrived and started before 7 min into the video. Thats actually pretty good. As to the other nonchalant problems, did you ever see a car or truck BLOW up in a fire? Only in the movies.

We take too much for granted and dont appreciate the VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS in this nation enough. Remember. They didn't start the fire that YOU expect them to put out.
The fire department is a volunteer unit, as stated... (show quote)



Still doesn't excuse how long it took to put water on the fire once they arrived. Volunteer or not they are supposed to practice and prepare for these situations.

Reply
Jan 31, 2016 18:36:00   #
twowindsbear
 
skylinefirepest wrote:
The lines are pre-connected and the fire attack should have been started on the water in the truck...and the first truck should have been an engine not a tanker. Then while the attack is being made and other units are arriving they run a line to a hydrant, block the road, etc. The first in engine parks catty angle to the road which blocks it very effectively and gives the engineer a protected environment to operate from. The attack line is deployed un-charged which makes it quick and easy. Once the line is charged then it makes it more difficult to manuever hence the two men on the line.
I'm a twenty five year volunteer at a station that dropped it's ISO rating from a nine to a six with a portable water supply...meaning that we didn't have enough hydrants in our operating area. We were the first in the state of North Carolina to do that! I drive our two thousand gallon tanker which has a deluge gun, a trash line, two pre-connects and a thousand gpm pump. It's fifty thousand pounds of firefighting perfection. And I expect that it's going to be retired about the time that I am since it's now over twenty years old. Our newest engine is a cafs engine that is the latest in firefighting. I love it but I'm getting old...
The lines are pre-connected and the fire attack sh... (show quote)


What are your thoughts on a sprinkler/automatic supression system for a 'filling station?' What building codes require them? Are they common?

TIA

Reply
Jan 31, 2016 18:47:53   #
twowindsbear
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Seriously?! Of course, they are almost the norm, especially when they have those overhead canopies. There are several large red cans of chemical on the posts, with piping running overhead. When the heat of a flame is detected, the extinguishers go to work.

About 43 seconds in -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCxILM8o-RU


Yes, seriosly. I have never seen any sort of 'sprinkler system' at a filling station. If there was one at the location in the OP's video it certainly didn't activate. A cursory drive through within the last hour showed only a portable extinguisher on each of the 5 pump islands

What facts have you based your statements on. Or are you making a typical UHH WAG??

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2016 20:03:14   #
skylinefirepest Loc: Southern Pines, N.C.
 
2windsbear, I've never seen a suppression system at a gas station. I suppose that there could be some...just that I've never seen one. There are automatic cutoffs at the pump island and one inside the store in case of gas spillage. When you see how many people still smoke or use cellphones around gas pumps it's amazing that more of them don't burn!

Reply
Jan 31, 2016 20:17:48   #
skylinefirepest Loc: Southern Pines, N.C.
 
Wetnwild...actually I have seen vehicles blow but it is very unusual. I've seen gas tanks fail and a trail of fire go down the road, propane tanks bleve, tires blow, ac systems blow, etc. Vehicle fires are very photogenic. I've even seen some vehicles catch on fire when they wreck...some with fatal results. Cars going airborne and blowing up are a movie thing. I've seen aerosol cans bleve and go all the way through a layer of half inch sheet rock...and people think that ammunition in a home is dangerous to the firemen when all it does is pop the primer and fizzle. I have a photo of an aerosol can that shot the end of the can into the attic of a garage and made a perfect hole in the ceiling...can you imagine what that would have done to a fireman?

Reply
Feb 1, 2016 05:35:39   #
picturedude Loc: Yosemite natl. park, Ca.
 
All the time, and with multiple extinguishers located in strategic sites.

Reply
Feb 1, 2016 05:59:28   #
picturedude Loc: Yosemite natl. park, Ca.
 
What a bunch of morons. Getting that close. I'm surprised nobody pulled up to a pump and filling their cars up.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.