Hilary receives $650 million (Page 3): :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: He is a brilliant no nonsense kind of a guy.

Checkmate Loc: Southern California

2Dragons wrote:

I generally put a lot of faith in what Charles has to say.

http://www.truthorfiction.com/charles-krauthammer-calls-the-clinton-foundation-organized-crime/

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
He is a brilliant no nonsense kind of a guy.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

ken hubert wrote:

Hey STUPID! !! Your in the attic. Don't like what is said, then get the f ¥ck out of it.!!

While you are correct you didn't get your point across any better by displaying so much vitriol.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

warrior wrote:

How am I to ignore White Water and Bengazzi(spell)??

What evidence do you have of anything that you need to ignore. Since the Benghazi committee hasn't found anything. Maybe you should share some of your evidence with them.

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

bugguy wrote:

You can't and no one asked anyone to. If you resea... (show quote)

Yes. One could make a good case that all politicians are corrupt. But there is a difference with the Hillary thing. The money donated to the Clinton Foundation was supposed to be a charitable deduction. If any of those funds was siphoned off to pay for Hillary's favors or for her political activities that would be a serious crime. At this moment there is no proof that any of this happened, but it is part o the FBI investigation.

FrumCA

thom w wrote:

What evidence do you have of anything that you need to ignore. Since the Benghazi committee hasn't found anything. Maybe you should share some of your evidence with them.

I think the Benghazi commitee has found a lot and they are still investigating. I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't waiting for the best opportunity and timing to do the 'slam dunk' on her. That, along with the FBI investigation of her very serious security breaches should do it, particularly if the DOJ does it's job.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

warrior wrote:

How am I to ignore White Water and Bengazzi(spell)??

You are going to do that by not dwelling on the past and living in the present.

No one--even the Benghazi committee--is talking about Benghazi now.

Who was that other thing you mentioned? White Water? When was that?

What does that matter?

Now, in the present: Who is that Trump guy? Do you really want to vote for him, yes or no, and why?

How about Ted Cruz? Is he your man? Why is that?

Are you really going to ignore Jeb? Why?

Who--in both parties--is qualified? Name anyone who has the qualifications to be president, who is actually running. There are three, possibly four.

Who are they, and why? And Which One are you going to vote for?

Benghazi and that other thing, White Water are Ancient History. Stay in the present.

That's bad enough.

2Dragons Loc: The Back of Beyond

Twardlow wrote:

You are going to do that by not dwelling on the pa... (show quote)

How can we ignore/forget what we are supposed to base our votes on in the coming election? If we do that, we have learned nothing. This history of bad decisions is what we base our trust in that whomever we pick is going to make the right decision at least 95% of the time. We had nothing to judge Obama by as he voted "Present" nearly all of the short time he was in the Senate.

FrumCA

2Dragons wrote:

How can we ignore/forget what we are supposed to base our votes on in the coming election? If we do that, we have learned nothing. This history of bad decisions is what we base our trust in that whomever we pick is going to make the right decision at least 95% of the time. We had nothing to judge Obama by as he voted "Present" nearly all of the short time he was in the Senate.

Not to mention that the low information voters completely ignored this little factoid about Obama. That is one of the primary reasons I did not vote for him. He would not take a stand on anything.

Texcaster Loc: Queensland

[quote=FrumCA]I think the Benghazi commitee has found a lot and they are still investigating. I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't waiting for the best opportunity and timing to do the 'slam dunk' on her. That, along with the FBI investigation of her very serious security breaches should do it, particularly if the DOJ does it's job.[/quote

Ronald Reagans Benghazi

Security breaches right up the chain of command, THREE times, over 300 US dead. Financed by the very people Col. North was selling arms to.

http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/ronald-reagans-benghazi

bw79st Loc: New York City

warrior wrote:

How am I to ignore White Water and Bengazzi(spell)??

You could try, since all parties seem to agree that there was nothing there in either case. You can drop the prayer vigils for Vince Foster too.

bugguy Loc: midwest

Texcaster wrote:

Calm down little man. If you can't handle a little descent perhaps YOU should find a nice, cozy, padded echo chamber and plot putting all libs in a guarded camp. You could at last, have a purpose in life.

Texcaster it didn't surprise me that someone responded like that. I'm actually shocked it took as long as it did. Some people revert to name calling when you dare have a different opinion, or challenge them on facts. And although this particular individual didn't use the "Lib" word someone called me that later on. Again when all else fails, call names. BTW is "Liberal" suppose to be a bad word now? Amazingly this post started off by the OP asking about Hillary Clinton's financial donors. When I merely mentioned that she was no different then the rest of them we got sidetracked on her alleged scandals and investigations. Didn't one of the main individuals behind the investigations admit that the real reason behind it was to hurt her politically? These same individuals are the first ones to cry about government waste. How much are these "witch hunts" costing the tax payer? Oh and you forgot to tell that individual that since he will be able to guard the Lib camp he will be able to put the 15 or 20 guns he has to good use. BOTTOM LINE THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HILLARY AND THE REST OF THEM (good or bad) IS SHE SITS DOWN WHEN SHE GOES NUMBER 1.

bugguy Loc: midwest

Twardlow wrote:

You are going to do that by not dwelling on the pa... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

bugguy Loc: midwest

bw79st wrote:

You could try, since all parties seem to agree that there was nothing there in either case. You can drop the prayer vigils for Vince Foster too.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

bugguy Loc: midwest

boberic wrote:

Yes. One could make a good case that all politicians are corrupt. But there is a difference with the Hillary thing. The money donated to the Clinton Foundation was supposed to be a charitable deduction. If any of those funds was siphoned off to pay for Hillary's favors or for her political activities that would be a serious crime. At this moment there is no proof that any of this happened, but it is part o the FBI investigation.

boberic, I concur. Lets wait and see what the investigation discovers. It may uncover some wrong doing and it may uncover nothing. Just like the last investigation.

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

bugguy wrote:

boberic, I concur. Lets wait and see what the investigation discovers. It may uncover some wrong doing and it may uncover nothing. Just like the last investigation.

Even if she is not indicted, by her cavalier attitude regarding top security issues, she has proven that she does not hav the integrity to be trusted with the presidency.n She has ,by definition, commited several serious crimes. Because of Obama's justice department's lack of integrity I doubt that she will be punished at all.