Looking for a New Long Lenses Tamron or Nikon Which One ?
Jan 12, 2016 14:51:10 #
I'm new to photography, and learning. Last summer the Sigma 150-600 was recommended for my D7100. So far I'm liking it very much. I don't have any bird shots yet but got this out of that lens in Yellowstone last week
Bison in winter
Jan 12, 2016 15:09:30 #
ggttc wrote:
Shot with a Tamron 150-600 on a D810 2200ISO and 1/640 from my den window at about 20 feet
But I would like to try the Nikon
But I would like to try the Nikon
Hi, Ggttc! You might consider the micro four thirds format. Check out the link below. Panasonic 100-400 f4-6.3 LEICA elements. 100-400 = 200-800 f4-6.3
I do not know how to make it in blue so you can click on it for direck contact. Excuse me, I am not an expert on my computer, (MAC 21.5). But I will say, it's the best free information at ones fingertips!
In digital photograph, were all photographers! Never thought FILM would be replaced. AP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gU182bZ1WIQ
Jan 12, 2016 15:39:17 #
Bret wrote:
Here's one with that lens and a D7100...down-load this one and tell me about the feathers. Seems a tad bit sharper than the Sigma 150-500...which is an exceptional lens of its own.
WOW!!
Jan 12, 2016 15:40:00 #
Jan 12, 2016 17:45:35 #
Jan 12, 2016 19:48:12 #
I couldn't say what lens is better. I have the Tamron 150-600 and Im very happy with it.
Jan 12, 2016 20:21:21 #
wolfman wrote:
I wouldn't the say that the fixed aperture is a "major advantage". Your talking only 1/3 of a stop. As far as weather sealing goes, the Sigma Sport really has a "major advantage" over the others.
The reason the fixed aperture is a big deal is for anyone who shots in manual mode. With a variable aperture each time you zoom in or out it changes your settings.
Fixed aperture also gives you more predictable depth of field, especially when shooting wide open.
I do agree that the Sigma Sport does have a major weather sealing advantage although Nikon lenses are all much better sealed than Tamron.
Jan 12, 2016 20:38:02 #
Jlgad
Loc: Tennessee
Ok I've been reading a lot of good information that everyone has posted but I'm still not sure which lenses it will be. One minute I'm leaning toward the Nikon 200-500 and then someone will post a picture and make me rethink about it. Same thing with the Tamron 150-600 I'm seeing good photos and then I'm seeing some not so good.
Jan 12, 2016 20:41:01 #
Jlgad wrote:
Ok I've been reading a lot of good information that everyone has posted but I'm still not sure which lenses it will be. One minute I'm leaning toward the Nikon 200-500 and then someone will post a picture and make me rethink about it. Same thing with the Tamron 150-600 I'm seeing good photos and then I'm seeing some not so good.
once again, rent the lenses and see which one you like the best. everyone has their own style and technique which will make one lens appear better than another. the only way to be sure which one will work for you is to try the lenses in your real life style.
Jan 12, 2016 20:44:46 #
Jlgad wrote:
Ok I've been reading a lot of good information that everyone has posted but I'm still not sure which lenses it will be. One minute I'm leaning toward the Nikon 200-500 and then someone will post a picture and make me rethink about it. Same thing with the Tamron 150-600 I'm seeing good photos and then I'm seeing some not so good.
Don't go by the shots posted here--including mine. There's no way they'll tell you which lens is best for you. Read the reviews, rent or borrow, or just let your heart and your wallet decide.
Jan 12, 2016 20:49:14 #
Jlgad wrote:
I want either a (Tamron 150-600mm or Nikon 200-500... (show quote)
i have no use for tamron, buy the real deal nikon my opinion only
Jan 12, 2016 21:09:52 #
Jlgad wrote:
I want either a (Tamron 150-600mm or Nikon 200-500... (show quote)
Your budget, the lens's weight, lens management, and how close you get to your subject far out weigh any other considerations between these lenses.
Jan 13, 2016 00:12:43 #
Jlgad wrote:
I'm willing to here from Sigma people too!
Ive been buying sigma lenses (Art Series) as of late and they are soooo sharp. And I rented the Sigma 150-600 Sport when it came out and was very surprised at the Sharpness of such long a focal length change. It does need light to really SHINE. I've been reading reviews just today figured it would be a good time to . All the lenses have been out to really compare them side by side. So far what I'm reading is the Sigma Sport is the one who performs best over all as a wildlife lens. It does have some nice features, push pull for one. It makes finding and tracking larger BIF easier. It's built better too. I guess the latest firmware update makes it autofocus faster and more accurate. Then the overall sharpness is better. But it's a heavy beast. Nikon would be my next choice. It's easier to hand hold . The VR is supposed to be comparable on both. As for the Tamron I heard it really sucks in the dust but has its fan base. Or try a 300mm prime with a 1.4 tc. I heard this combo is sharper than any of the others. I have the Af-s 300 d f/4, it super sharp on my d810 and d7000. The 300 pf f4 with 1.4 tc or 1.7 is supposed to rock. Saw some bird picks with this combo. Great detail in the feathers. I really like the long prime lenses when the action gets fast . It seems like they are easier to handle and only one ring to deal with . But that's me and I'm pretty new to this game. Good luck
Jan 13, 2016 00:26:09 #
orrie smith wrote:
once again, rent the lenses and see which one you like the best. everyone has their own style and technique which will make one lens appear better than another. the only way to be sure which one will work for you is to try the lenses in your real life style.
This is good advice (style ) can dictate a lot. Like I said earlier with my style I really like primes. Long lenses can be hard to deal with and the more on them can make thing confusing when the action comes in. I really did like the Sigma and towards the end of my rental I was getting used to it. And it has the USB dock these are great but for me time consuming. I shoot thousands of test picks when setting.g the focus points on the Sigmas. I always allow for hits and misses. Then 're test and retest. And when it hits over and over in real world use I call it done. I've very picky when it comes the the sharpness . I view composition over sharpness but why not have both if it's available.
Jan 13, 2016 01:15:51 #
AP wrote:
Hi, Ggttc! You might consider the micro four thir... (show quote)
Why do you keep pushing an m4/3 lens when the OP has a Nikon D750 and D7100?
I have those bodies, and the Nikon 200-500. Like the lens a lot, but can't compare it to the Tamron or Sigma.
My issue with the lens is that it doesn't have drop-in filters, and the front element is REALLY big (95mm). So if I need filters, I go to my 300mm f/2.8 plus TC (1.4, 1.7 or 2.0 as needed) and drop in an ND or CPL filter.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.