Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Record Albums
Page <<first <prev 7 of 9 next> last>>
Jan 3, 2016 17:00:07   #
floral43
 
jeep_daddy wrote:
You still have not brought up the question - what does "LP" mean.

Long playing 33 rpm record !45 at that time played a single song on each side. When they finally figured out how to attenuate bass long wave lengths, and accentuate highs short wave lengths, they were able to fit more music onto a record, hence long playing.

Reply
Jan 3, 2016 17:15:33   #
floral43
 
jboy24 wrote:
Am I a little late to the party? As a music- vinyl lover collector audiophile guy of 48 years this really warms my hart to see a thread like this. Back in the 80's when digital first appeared the digital camp motto was "vinyl is dead" boy were they wrong. My Sota Cosmos Grahm arm Sheau cart puts out some very sweet sounds with all the dynamic range one could ever want couple that with vacuum tubes it is like heaven. Don't get me wrong there are some very good solid state rigs out there as is CD rigs but analogue/vinyl is special. It is great to see that vinyl production is up, in fact it has been going up for at least three years now as are turntable sales as a matter of fact there are a ton of turntable companies putting out new tables world wide. Also I met a Female Artist who has several albums out on CD and she is releasing here newest on vinyl and she told me that she just made the cut as the record processing plant stooped taking orders for new vinyl because they are at maximum production, this was back in late October. I've heard that also in the UK and other vinyl production plants. VINYL STILL LIVES so lets enjoy the music.
Am I a little late to the party? As a music- vinyl... (show quote)


Vinyl still lives because analog sounds better than digital, digital must be converted to analog! (DAC) due the conversion, this process causes time lapse problems do the nature of the electronics involved, ultimately leading to distortion known as jitter. How ever the latest high tec. dacs
can correct this problem, at a high cost.

Reply
Jan 3, 2016 19:37:43   #
ecar Loc: Oregon, USA
 
Peterff wrote:
Most turntables like yours won't play 78s at the correct speed, but you can still hook them up and record the audio and then speed it up with audio software. Goldwave will do that, and I'm sure that other packages will be able to.

Good luck.


Which version of Goldwave are you using?

Reply
 
 
Jan 3, 2016 21:46:52   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
ecar wrote:
Which version of Goldwave are you using?


The latest, v6.18 on Windows 10

Reply
Jan 3, 2016 22:58:47   #
jboy24 Loc: Downey Ca,
 
floral43 wrote:
Vinyl still lives because analog sounds better than digital, digital must be converted to analog! (DAC) due the conversion, this process causes time lapse problems do the nature of the electronics involved, ultimately leading to distortion known as jitter. How ever the latest high tec. dacs
can correct this problem, at a high cost.


Absolutely, too much electronics in the way.. analogue is better in so many ways, however I have heard some of the latest Hi Res stuff and it sounds very good not to mention it cost a fortune, but I still love analogue and with my budget I will just keep replacing tubes update the internal components when needed. My VTL mono's and my ARC SP 10 (an incredible phono preamp) are 20 + yrs old and they sound unbelievably close to the new stuff out there thanks to these special tubes that I have acquired that are costing me allot.

Reply
Jan 3, 2016 23:17:48   #
jboy24 Loc: Downey Ca,
 
bimmer124 wrote:
Finally a discussion on vinyl. There is no emotion in digital.
I currently own and use three turntables. SOTA Star Sapphire, Riga ll, and AR-XA. I have collected vinyl since I was a lad and working at a radio station in my career certainly helped as I own over 4k 33rpms and another 3k 45s. The digital revolution tossed aside some of the most sound conductive vehicles to ever be recorded. I own thousands of cds, but they cannot replicate the sound of a good vinyl album. My example would be the classics. Listen to The Ring on cd and then put on a copy in vinyl.
The emotion projected in vinyl wins every time. This should be a wake up call to anyone who truly needs to listen to music the way it was meant to be heard.
Finally a discussion on vinyl. There is no emotion... (show quote)


Since I found this thread a little late I am playing cath up, this is from the first couple pages... I absolutely agree, this is my feelings exactly about vinyl, I could not put it any better. To this day with the Hi Res stuff analogue/vinyl sounds warm lush oh so natural like it is being performed live in your living room with ALL the emotion, you just DONOT get that with digital...

Reply
Jan 3, 2016 23:35:47   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
In my younger days I played accordion in a band (yes, I wore lederhosen and sang beer drinking songs at Oktoberfest; good money, BTW -- it put me through university). At one point I "upgraded" to a Cordovox, which was essentially an accordion modified to have switches under every key and button, plus a few control switches on the front. The accordion was connected to a vacuum tube organ tone generator via a monstrous 3/4-inch diameter cable terminating with two 50-pin connectors at the accordion. The tone generator box was then connected to an amplifier box. The entire setup ran on 67 vacuum tubes -- a room heater, in other words!!! Yeah, well before the days of MIDI.

A fellow musician bought a newer version of Cordovox that had gone solid state. All the guts were inside the bellows space, so he simply had to connect to an amplifier via a 1/4-inch microphone jack and cable, much like a guitar.

Well, we both performed on floats in the annual Oktoberfest Parade, and one year it rained. Of course, we did not dare get the electronic bits wet, so we played "un-amplified" (i.e., just the accordion, no organ sounds) on the floats. But even the garbage bag draped over my instrument could not keep all the water out. Later that day we had to plug the instruments into their respective amplifiers to perform at the beer halls. His Cordovox went "poof", and that was the end of it. Mine with the tubes, on the other hand, just merrily played a bunch of notes all by itself until the switches dried out, and then it was fine.

On a different night of performing my sax player had put a mug of beer on the organ generator box and then swung around and knocked it over. As the beer ran down the circuit board the instrument again played notes all by itself until the "shorts" subsided, and all was well again.

All this to say that tubes, while more susceptible to mechanical damage than solid state, were way more tolerant of electrical insults.

Reply
 
 
Jan 4, 2016 15:17:33   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
JohnFrim wrote:
In my younger days I played accordion in a band (yes, I wore lederhosen and sang beer drinking songs at Oktoberfest; good money, BTW -- it put me through university). At one point I "upgraded" to a Cordovox, which was essentially an accordion modified to have switches under every key and button, plus a few control switches on the front. The accordion was connected to a vacuum tube organ tone generator via a monstrous 3/4-inch diameter cable terminating with two 50-pin connectors at the accordion. The tone generator box was then connected to an amplifier box. The entire setup ran on 67 vacuum tubes -- a room heater, in other words!!! Yeah, well before the days of MIDI.

A fellow musician bought a newer version of Cordovox that had gone solid state. All the guts were inside the bellows space, so he simply had to connect to an amplifier via a 1/4-inch microphone jack and cable, much like a guitar.

Well, we both performed on floats in the annual Oktoberfest Parade, and one year it rained. Of course, we did not dare get the electronic bits wet, so we played "un-amplified" (i.e., just the accordion, no organ sounds) on the floats. But even the garbage bag draped over my instrument could not keep all the water out. Later that day we had to plug the instruments into their respective amplifiers to perform at the beer halls. His Cordovox went "poof", and that was the end of it. Mine with the tubes, on the other hand, just merrily played a bunch of notes all by itself until the switches dried out, and then it was fine.

On a different night of performing my sax player had put a mug of beer on the organ generator box and then swung around and knocked it over. As the beer ran down the circuit board the instrument again played notes all by itself until the "shorts" subsided, and all was well again.

All this to say that tubes, while more susceptible to mechanical damage than solid state, were way more tolerant of electrical insults.
In my younger days I played accordion in a band (y... (show quote)



Aah! All the accordion jokes that come to mind! More seriously, are you familiar with the playing of Phil Cunningham? If not, give his album 'The Palomino Waltz' a listen.

Cheers

Reply
Jan 4, 2016 15:48:33   #
RichardQ Loc: Colorado
 
jerryc41 wrote:
As a kid, I remember adults paging through record albums. It was an actual album containing sleeves full of 78 RPM records - before the age of vinyl. You dropped it, you broke it. Instead of having one vinyl 33 1/3 RPM disc with a dozen songs, you would buy a large, heavy album with twelve individual records, each with just one song.

Today, we still call an individual LP an album, just as we say we are dialing a phone number on a cell phone, or going sailing on a ship powered by something other than sails.
As a kid, I remember adults paging through record ... (show quote)


One correction, Jerry. Each 10-inch-diameter 78-rpm record carried TWO songs, one on each side, so 12 songs would fit on SIX records. The larger 12-inch 78-rpm records were usually intended for classical music.

Reply
Jan 4, 2016 16:17:27   #
Jim Bob
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I'm sure that many of you, like me, know why LP record albums are called "albums."


And this thread is related to photography, how?

Reply
Jan 4, 2016 16:18:31   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
Jim Bob wrote:
And this thread is related to photography, how?


Very tenuously, from the sound of it!

Reply
 
 
Jan 4, 2016 16:52:21   #
coj Loc: NJ, USA
 
It is related because photographers are discussing it!! Heh - heh.

Jim Bob wrote:
And this thread is related to photography, how?

Reply
Jan 4, 2016 17:21:48   #
RichardQ Loc: Colorado
 
Peterff wrote:
Very tenuously, from the sound of it!


I was born in 1927, so my first phonograph was -- believe it or not -- an Edison wind-up which played TUBULAR (aka CYLINDRICAL) recordings that resembled a rotating lathe. This was the only way to record sound until the flat rotating disc was invented. The pickup traversed from one end to the other and carried a horn for amplification, although the sound level could be enjoyed without the horn. The recording tube material was a thick black plastic-like substance, and the title was embossed on the outer end of the tube's rim. Edison, who ironically was partially deaf, fought fiercely to kill the disk competition but lost out.

Anyway, I eventually accumulated some 2,000 vinyl LP albums which are neatly filed in racks in my basement so they can't cause my floor to sag. My appreciation for the 12-inch format is especially strong for the extra features, such as opera librettos (who can read the tiny librettos included with CDs?) and photos of performers.

In 2004 I bought a software program called the DAK 2000 for converting and editing my LPs and cassettes into WAV and MP3 files. (DAK is short for Drew Kaplan, who was a prolific catalog producer in the day.) I don't know if the company is still in business but the system is marvellous, as far as i'm concerned. It cost $19.95 and was downloaded into my computer without any hardware. It's terrific fun to use. You plug your turntable or cassette player into a small amplifier which you connect to the apprpriate computer port on your computer's backside. When you play your analog recording, it produces a real-time wave pattern of each stereo channel while creating a file. When it's complete, you can play back the wave patterns and enlarge them to the point of isolating any dust "pop" or distortion so it can be deleted. But it has many more features as well. The hefty instruction manual is also transmitted and is fun to read.
If you want to look it up, try: www.dak.com.reviews/Tutorial_LP.cfm

Reply
Jan 4, 2016 17:35:46   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
RichardQ wrote:
I was born in 1927, so my first phonograph was -- believe it or not -- an Edison wind-up which played TUBULAR (aka CYLINDRICAL) recordings that resembled a rotating lathe. This was the only way to record sound until the flat rotating disc was invented. The pickup traversed from one end to the other and carried a horn for amplification, although the sound level could be enjoyed without the horn. The recording tube material was a thick black plastic-like substance, and the title was embossed on the outer end of the tube's rim. Edison, who ironically was partially deaf, fought fiercely to kill the disk competition but lost out.

Anyway, I eventually accumulated some 2,000 vinyl LP albums which are neatly filed in racks in my basement so they can't cause my floor to sag. My appreciation for the 12-inch format is especially strong for the extra features, such as opera librettos (who can read the tiny librettos included with CDs?) and photos of performers.

In 2004 I bought a software program called the DAK 2000 for converting and editing my LPs and cassettes into WAV and MP3 files. (DAK is short for Drew Kaplan, who was a prolific catalog producer in the day.) I don't know if the company is still in business but the system is marvellous, as far as i'm concerned. It cost $19.95 and was downloaded into my computer without any hardware. It's terrific fun to use. You plug your turntable or cassette player into a small amplifier which you connect to the apprpriate computer port on your computer's backside. When you play your analog recording, it produces a real-time wave pattern of each stereo channel while creating a file. When it's complete, you can play back the wave patterns and enlarge them to the point of isolating any dust "pop" or distortion so it can be deleted. But it has many more features as well. The hefty instruction manual is also transmitted and is fun to read.
If you want to look it up, try: www.dak.com.reviews/Tutorial_LP.cfm
I was born in 1927, so my first phonograph was -- ... (show quote)


And now you can claim to be a sound engineer amongst your other accomplishments! How cool is that? :-D

There are many comparable devices that perform the same function, and also software packages. Although I like to have good quality audio and always aim for it, for me the most important aspect is the recordings that are no longer available anywhere for all sorts of reasons, from licensing issues to insufficient market opportunity. Vinyl and even CDs are an archive resource that we may lose, especially from the independent musicians, as is the album art which frequently brings us back to photography!

Cheers

Reply
Jan 4, 2016 17:52:00   #
RichardQ Loc: Colorado
 
This is a promotion photo from Columbia Records, ca. 1947, illustrating the space saving of 33-1/3 rpm LP vinyl records vs. a stack of 78-rpm shellac records with the same music in both.



Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.