Agree!

The optical viewfinder on my DSLR is much better than the viewfinders on every point and shoot camera and the A6000 that I have used. The view is small and dark. If you can't 'see' your subject, how is the composition of your shot? Then there is the LCD screen used exclusively on phones and some point and shoot cameras that are totally is useless in daylight. Until the viewfinder improves on point and shoot or mft cameras, I know that I would never buy one.

And while some cell phone pictures can be great, for most of us, blow them up a bit and you will see that most cell phone pics have motion blur.

Here we are again, arguing about the advantages of various photographic technologies.

When I was just a boy, I was introduced to the joys of photography by the presentation of an Ansco box camera by an Uncle. I loved that thing and images I captured, but couldn't get my family to support my new found need for film and processing. When I finally was old enough to get a paper route, I got a folding/bellows camera. But in a few more years it was sports and girls, then college, job, family ... A snapshot here and there with another box camera until finally I went out and got myself a 35 mm rangefinder.

Loved those pictures, but soon felt constricted by just a single focal length and started lusting after a camera with interchangeable lenses. Lots of choices back then: Minolta, Pentax, Ricoh, Mamiya, Miranda, others; I soon narrowed the field to Nikon, Canon and Olympus. The small size and exquisite handling of the Olympus OMn's won out, and I was happy with them for the next decade and a half.

By then age was catching up and I saw real value in auto focus. That then meant Nikon or Canon, and Canon had just dumped their FD lens mount in favor of the new EF mount (earlier R and FL mounts long since abandoned) and I opted for the stability of Nikon's commitment to their 1959 F mount. Another decade plus, and we're in the digital age! Now progress in sensors and data handling requires frequent camera replacement.

Today the controversy is DSLR or mirrorless! Get rid of that clunky, loud, vibration inducing mirror and probably the shutter; simplify lens design; smaller and lighter! Advantage mirrorless! BUT, not if I have to scrap my considerable investment in glass, or lose any of the capabilities my system now affords me.

Interesting Discussion.
I've been a professional videographer for over 20 years and have experienced so many changes in the way video is captured: first Betamax- far-superior to VHS - but didn't initially keep up with VHS's ability to achieve longer playing speeds. We went through Super VHS, Hi-8, Digital Video, and now video can be captured on Media Cards in High-Definition and even 4K.
I have $ 6,000 cameras I couldn't sell for $ 150.00
today. They're huge. I can shoot better footage with
smaller cameras on media cards. When I was shooting on tape, it would take real time to capture footage into my computer (4 hours of footage would take 4 hours); now, 4 hours shot on a media card can be loaded into my computer
in a matter of minutes.
CDs replaced reel-to-reel tape, vinyl, and everything else. I still enjoy playing my reel-to-reel tapes on equipment that would give you a hernia just to lift it, but I enjoy playing my tapes because it brings me emotionally back to an earlier time I loved.
Canon and Nikon are in the business of making money.
At some point, what we know as DSLR will go the way of film. We'll feel the sadness, but ultimately we'll have to embrace the new kids on the block.

PS: With all of this mind, my camera of choice right now is a Canon 6D (I also have a Canon 70D). Rumors around the internet suggest that Canon might be releasing
a new Canon 5D replacement for the Mark III ( a Mark IV).
I'd like to wait and see. I was thinking of moving up to
this camera if it comes on the market. Any thoughts, since
the discussion focuses on the new mirrorless cameras by Sony. The issue for me always becomes my Canon lenses, which I love. Stay with DSLR or go mirrorless??? Any mirrorless users out there who could shed light on their experiences with this format?