joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
I have a trial version of PS CC for the next month. Got it today and so far as I can see its very much like CS 6.
I shot a few birds (its cold outside) to get files to try out.
Same shot processed in different editors...what's your preference.
edit: The tools in CS 6 are so small on my new monitor at 3840x2160 I can just barely make them out. PS CC does not have this problem.
Posted the wrong file. :|
I really see no difference except for some discoloration behind the neck in the PS version. So first one.
joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
tomvanb wrote:
I really see no difference except for some discoloration behind the neck in the PS version. So first one.
I tried to do as little as possible. NX 2 has D-lighting which makes it simple. With a little more work both could be better.
I like NX-D best of all but it has the same problem as CS 6.
This shot was with the same camera settings and lighting. All I did was crop it.
Much too early to make a judgement on PS CC. Just fooling around for now.
joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
After playing with PS CC for a week I decided to remove it and not subscribe.
What I did like about it is that at the highest res on my 4K monitor the tools were small but still very legible.
For the processing that I do CS6 & ACR 9.1.1 are more than adequate. Although $10 a month is quite a deal especially if you go for the updates, but I'm just too frugal about somethings.
I lowered the monitor res and everything is fine. I don't know what I'll be using in a year.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.