Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Catalog Feature In Lightroom CC
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Dec 13, 2015 13:48:50   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
Tommg wrote:
Sounds like you don't want to use RL and I respect that. Some articles seem to make LR overly complicated when it really isn't.
The only thing which is suggested (you are welcome to do whatever you like) is that you place ALL of your photographs into a single file folder ... inside that single folder you can have as many subfolder as you want ... arranged in the way you want then tell LR where that master folder lives, after that LR will always know where to find your photographs (even if you decide not to use LR.
Using the "master folder" has another benefit ... whenever you want to backup all your photographs (to a external hard drive or whatever) you only have to copy the "master folder" and you are finished. Your choice ... LR never does anything with your photos unless you tell it to do something. Have fun!
Sounds like you don't want to use RL and I respect... (show quote)


Very true ;)

:thumbup:

Reply
Dec 13, 2015 14:01:01   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
georgevedwards wrote:
I too got Lightroom with the Cloud but for the life of me can't figure it out after almost a year now. I too have tried to bypass the catalogue and just use the image processing without much success. They say it doesn't move the originals from your files but when ever I attach my camera or cd/dvd disc files Lightroom seems to want to take them somewhere. My hard drive is filled up and it wants to put them there under "Pictures" Trying to change that, and cataloging in general to take place on an external hard drive seems to take a college degree in LR. I discussed it at a meeting of my photography group of photographers from the Baltimore area, but no one had a good answer, they basically said "just let LR do it the way it wants, storing in "Pictures" on your computers own hard drive. It is only a small data file and not the real image" Yet the books I have read recommend storing actual photograph files in a Lightroom named file so they are not spread out all over. No one here yet seems to know how to answer these questions, the best you get is read a book, talk to a knowledgeable person or just go to another website. Been there, done that, thats why I come here! This has become my "Never Ending Story".
I too got Lightroom with the Cloud but for the lif... (show quote)


All this is completely controllable by YOU.

By default, LR is set up to do a lot of things automatically... downloads, folder creation and naming, etc. BUT you can turn them off or on in preferences and the Import dialog box.

For Pete's sake! Buy Scott Kelby's or similar book and learn to use LR. Or take a class. Don't ask us to reprint it all here!

The PROBLEM with Adobe PS/LR CC is that it's too damned cheap, so that there are tons of new users jumping in "the deep end" without a clue how to swim... and are unwilling to take the lessons beyond watching 5 minute video on YouTube or reading a 140 character Tweet or a few paragraphs on a blog!

Photoshop alone can take the better part of a 4 year college degree's worth of classes to learn in it's entirety! Most of us never learn to use it all, by any means.... Probably the best among us only use 20-25% of it's actual capabilities and most actually only use somewhat less.

Lightroom is less complex... and more intuitive once you learn the basics. But it's still not a simple program, by any means. To take full advantage of it's powerful capabilities, please take a few classes or buy and read a book! There are online tutorials, too, if you prefer.

If unwilling to learn LR and/or PS... Buy Adobe Elements instead. It includes some of the most frequently used features from both LR and PS, plus can be configured to your level of knowledge: Beginner, Intermediate or Advanced User. You can start with the easiest and most assisted interface then, when you feel comfortable enough, take the training wheels off and step up to the next level. Or if you're using one of the more advanced and find yourself getting bogged down, you can switch back to the more assisted.

LR and PS don't have these "training wheels". For help getting going with these more complex programs, you have to read a book or take a class. If you don't, you've basically wasted your money buying (or "renting" ) the software and not knowing how to use it to meet your particular needs.

Reply
Dec 13, 2015 14:29:35   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
"By default, LR is set up to do a lot of things automatically..."

Some people just don't get it. I wish they stop trying to force their preferences on others.

Reply
 
 
Dec 13, 2015 14:47:53   #
Whuff Loc: Marshalltown, Iowa
 
[quote=Dngallagher]Went into Lightroom, renamed an image in finder, that means Lightroom "lost" it...

Now Lightroom shows the preview image with a [!] in the pictures frame, click on the [!] and it asked if you wish to LOCATE it... click on locate and it brings up finder - once you locate it, double click and it is now found in the Lightroom database - pretty simple & intuitive if you ask me.

Nothing is difficult if you know how to do it. Those of us who aren't highly technically knowledgeable have a different view of difficult. You lost me at "finder". I assume this is a Mac feature, I'm using a PC. I will make a note of this and try it next time I have a problem. Thanks

Walt

Reply
Dec 13, 2015 15:01:13   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
[quote=Whuff]
Dngallagher wrote:
Went into Lightroom, renamed an image in finder, that means Lightroom "lost" it...

Now Lightroom shows the preview image with a [!] in the pictures frame, click on the [!] and it asked if you wish to LOCATE it... click on locate and it brings up finder - once you locate it, double click and it is now found in the Lightroom database - pretty simple & intuitive if you ask me.

Nothing is difficult if you know how to do it. Those of us who aren't highly technically knowledgeable have a different view of difficult. You lost me at "finder". I assume this is a Mac feature, I'm using a PC. I will make a note of this and try it next time I have a problem. Thanks

Walt
Went into Lightroom, renamed an image in finder, t... (show quote)


The Finder on the Mac is a file manager like Explorer on the PC.

You can't have two people moving folders around in a file cabinet in the office right? If you organize the files and the secretary comes along and moves some of the folders to another drawer, next time you look, you won't be able to find them. Where are they? You have to ask her "where are those folders"?

Same thing with Lightroom and Explorer.

Reply
Dec 13, 2015 15:02:42   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
[quote=Whuff]
Dngallagher wrote:
Went into Lightroom, renamed an image in finder, that means Lightroom "lost" it...

Now Lightroom shows the preview image with a [!] in the pictures frame, click on the [!] and it asked if you wish to LOCATE it... click on locate and it brings up finder - once you locate it, double click and it is now found in the Lightroom database - pretty simple & intuitive if you ask me.

Nothing is difficult if you know how to do it. Those of us who aren't highly technically knowledgeable have a different view of difficult. You lost me at "finder". I assume this is a Mac feature, I'm using a PC. I will make a note of this and try it next time I have a problem. Thanks

Walt
Went into Lightroom, renamed an image in finder, t... (show quote)


Walt, yes indeed, finder=explorer ;)

Reply
Dec 13, 2015 15:11:05   #
Whuff Loc: Marshalltown, Iowa
 
Dngallagher wrote:
Walt, yes indeed, finder=explorer ;)


In truth I'm not familiar with Explorer either. There's a search function I've used but I don't know where explorer is. Where do I find that?

Walt

Reply
 
 
Dec 13, 2015 15:33:00   #
mainshipper Loc: Hernando, Florida
 
bsprague wrote:
LR thinks like "old school" photographers. We kept their film negatives in careful filing systems. We created proof sheets of each roll of film and kept them in binders with notes. When we printed we would add to the notes with exposure times, develop times, burns, dodges, etc. In other words, we kept a manual data base of our work.

LR uses the Library, and its computer catalog, like our old notebooks. It records were the original is and never changes the original....just like negatives. When you shift an image to the Develop module you can make your burning, dodging, cropping, etc changes. They are recorded in the catalog just like the notes we kept. They are not recorded on the original just like we would not write on a negative.

We used to only make paper prints and duplicates based on our notes. LR will make those prints, but also make the other forms of display we now can use.

The LR catalog and Library will retain your strong folder based organization system. It may enhance it with being able to add notes, tags and ratings to your already strong system.
LR thinks like "old school" photographer... (show quote)


That's a terrific analogy and is just what LR was designed to accomplish. I think too many people are so focused on the editing features of photo software that they miss or ignore the organizing capabilities that go along way towards helping one keep track of the zillions of images that we have on our hands these days. Many people use LR in different ways but you cannot use it effectively (or at all) without having the images making their way into the catalog in some form or fashion. Personally, I use it as a work space or the hub that I use to peruse through my many images that I've just offloaded from my camera storage and subsequently perform some form of post-processing be it in LR's develop module or an external application. After that I can export it to a format that is suitable for whatever purpose I want (print, email, competition, etc.). I can then return to LR and look through the photos again if I want and still have the luxury of looking at them in that contact sheet format of yesteryear. What I don't do with LR is maintain a giant monolithic catalog containing every picture I have ever taken that is embellished with extensive metadata about the particular shots. I do go in and rate individual images in a dump of 300-500 shots I just took of birds so I can quickly see the subset I have created by simply filtering on that flag. From that point I can delete the non-flagged shots en mass or export the filtered (and tuned) shots as JPGs to a folder for subsequent processing as mentioned earlier.

For all of you who still cannot "figure out" LR then I suggest that you simply work on your images one shot at a time in PS, Elements, or whatever and be content that it's what works for you.

Reply
Dec 13, 2015 18:33:25   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
Whuff wrote:
In truth I'm not familiar with Explorer either. There's a search function I've used but I don't know where explorer is. Where do I find that?

Walt


You must have used explorer if you used windows....:)

It is the file manager.... shows all your files and folders on your disks...

Windows Explorer... in Win7 under accessories....

Win7 Windows Explorer
Win7 Windows Explorer...
(Download)

Reply
Dec 13, 2015 18:34:35   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Whuff wrote:
In truth I'm not familiar with Explorer either. There's a search function I've used but I don't know where explorer is. Where do I find that?

Walt


It looks like a little file folder symbol on the PC.

There are always multiple ways to do any given thing when using a computer. If you have a method that works don't worry about the other methods.

Reply
Dec 14, 2015 11:07:51   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
mainshipper wrote:
That's a terrific analogy and is just what LR was designed to accomplish. ....
Thanks. That's a nice compliment!

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2015 16:24:14   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
joer wrote:
I've did a search and was overwhelmed with the number of posts on Lightroom. None that I looked at provided the info I was interested in. So here is the question to Lightroom users.

Can the catalog feature be turned off or worked around?


Glad you did the search and recognize the horrors of it. There are a few here who think it's the cat's meow and tons and tons who feel like you do. I personally use Bridge of Photoshop and I'm as happy as a Peter Griffin in an Olympic-size pool of beer.

Reply
Dec 15, 2015 16:32:07   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
joer wrote:
I think I could live with Frapha's method of handling files.

I hope I'm not boring some of you with simple questions but I try to do research before I buy into something.

I use CS6 with several plug-ins and all of Nikons programs as well as the editors that come with windows.

Is there anything LR CC would give me that I couldn't do with the existing programs.


No. Nothing except buying books to learn the cataloging functions. I use PS-CC and its ACR is everything LR is, and more.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.