Thought I had seen everything until
Dec 10, 2015 14:26:16 #
Today's B&H enews came where there is a review of Stylish Cameras. Can a scene be turned into a "great" photo with anything but a stylish camera !
Dec 10, 2015 14:33:57 #
Dec 11, 2015 08:36:34 #
John_F wrote:
Today's B&H enews came where there is a review of Stylish Cameras. Can a scene be turned into a "great" photo with anything but a stylish camera !
If you have shoes that match your handbag, you probably need a stylish camera. :D
Dec 11, 2015 09:08:46 #
Dec 11, 2015 10:51:01 #
If you think so it will. If you think it can't it won't.
John_F wrote:
Today's B&H enews came where there is a review of Stylish Cameras. Can a scene be turned into a "great" photo with anything but a stylish camera !
Dec 11, 2015 10:52:17 #
Dec 11, 2015 11:06:49 #
RichieC
Loc: Adirondacks
That Sony/Hasselblad mirrorless was indeed a pretty, and most likely, considering its combined pedigree, a very capable product that looks good doing it.
Isn't this argument akin to comparing a old LandRover to a Lamborghini, they both get you there... LOL
Isn't this argument akin to comparing a old LandRover to a Lamborghini, they both get you there... LOL
Dec 11, 2015 11:22:19 #
RichieC wrote:
That Sony/Hasselblad mirrorless was indeed a pretty, and most likely, considering its combined pedigree, a very capable product that looks good doing it.
Isn't this argument akin to comparing a old LandRover to a Lamborghini, they both get you there... LOL
Isn't this argument akin to comparing a old LandRover to a Lamborghini, they both get you there... LOL
got to say, that camera is as ugly as ugly gets :)
Dec 11, 2015 11:56:35 #
corryhully wrote:
got to say, that camera is as ugly as ugly gets :)
Well, this just cries out for having a "camera beauty contest." Who will be the the first to march their favorite down the runway (to fame).
Dec 11, 2015 13:11:52 #
John_F wrote:
Today's B&H enews came where there is a review of Stylish Cameras. Can a scene be turned into a "great" photo with anything but a stylish camera !
If the camera is a part of the scene........, ABSOLUTELY!!!!!! :lol:
SS
Dec 11, 2015 13:25:00 #
John_F wrote:
Today's B&H enews came where there is a review of Stylish Cameras. Can a scene be turned into a "great" photo with anything but a stylish camera !
I do remember when Nikon introduced the F4 and it's "insane" price tag. I do remember it being something like 5X the cost of an F3. We soon referred to it as "Yuppie Jewelry". It brought on a new appreciation of the F3 by many users. In fact, the F3 outlasted the F4 and remained in production for 21 years.
Dec 11, 2015 14:11:51 #
Dec 11, 2015 15:56:06 #
RichieC
Loc: Adirondacks
corryhully wrote:
got to say, that camera is as ugly as ugly gets :)
LOL- Me too, interesting perhaps. Frankly, i don't find Rolls Royce's particularly attractive, but the quality, craftsmanship and materials are there!
There were several layouts of this Hasselblad/Sony... perhaps one is more to your liking. I don't find many cameras attractive, like the Apollo LEM now on the moon, all built for function.
Except perhaps a wood 8x10 format camera and matching tripod I saw once on Martha's Vinyard's Gay Head Beach (Named that in the 1600's). Or was it the attractive young girl peering under the hood? :)
Dec 11, 2015 16:06:06 #
corryhully wrote:
image is everything, as if you didn't know ;)
as we use to say where I worked, looks means everything, substance nothing.
Dec 11, 2015 17:37:20 #
RichieC wrote:
That Sony/Hasselblad mirrorless was indeed a pretty, and most likely, considering its combined pedigree, a very capable product that looks good doing it.
Isn't this argument akin to comparing a old LandRover to a Lamborghini, they both get you there... LOL
Isn't this argument akin to comparing a old LandRover to a Lamborghini, they both get you there... LOL
Maybe they do, but the Land Rover is much more fun.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.