Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Best "free" and "easy" post processing program?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Dec 6, 2015 15:25:27   #
GaryI Loc: NY & Fla
 
BobT wrote:
Thanks to all, thus far.

Anyone use FastStone? Your comments, please.


I'm very happy with some of my results with Faststone. Give it a try. Its free.

Reply
Dec 6, 2015 15:29:31   #
pecohen Loc: Central Maine
 
tomw wrote:
Intended to respond to pecohen
Thanks. I'll continue to play with it, but in the test I just did both are reported as 24 bit, but the PSP one is more than twice the size. FS version is a smaller print size, but I didn't change that. Also, the color balance is slightly different, again making me suspect that FS isn't starting with full RAW data.

What about the pixel count? If you open the file in PSP in the edit tab the size should show up below the right side of the image - if not, then left-mouse-click somewhere in the image.

Reply
Dec 6, 2015 15:53:57   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
BobT wrote:
Til now, I haven't had much interest in doing much post processing to my images. But have recently seen some before-and-after examples, and am becoming convinced that this might be more necessary than I had originally thought. I'm still not into RAW. So being a JPEGer, can I still get reasonable improvements with some degrees of post work? Or is RAW the only way to achieve the max. benefit?
I have dabbled in Picasa3, but that program leaves something to be desired. I have also downloaded PSE 10, but that seems way over my head; hence hasn't been touched.
Is there any easy, yet effective, and free, programs out there worthy of my consideration? The less the learning curve the better(yet I do expect there to be some). Thanks
Til now, I haven't had much interest in doing much... (show quote)


If you are running window 10 look at Photo (it part of the package) It simple, does a great job and free.

Reply
 
 
Dec 6, 2015 16:28:06   #
nekon Loc: Carterton, New Zealand
 
Download Photoshop CS2 free- The OEM code is:(It's not given with download)

1045-1928-2655-8647-2549-1095

Here's what works for me in Photoshop:

Here are my photoshop recipes:

Photoshop Recipes



1- Noise Control -(Chroma-colour noise)


- Image> Mode> LAB Colour> Channels
Channel “a” Gaussian blur 5 pixels
Channel “b” Gaussian blur 5 pixels
Channel “lightness” Filter> noise> despeckle
Image> Mode> RGB colour

2-Noise Control -(Luma -Grainy noise)

-lasso area and apply smart blur at default setting (For small areas)
-Or Ctrl+J
-Smart blur-Then eraser tool to expose background features


3- Lateral chromatic aberration (fringing) Removal

Ctrl+J select brush tool and click on the quick mask tool.
Choose a brush size to match the width of the fringe.
Draw all the areas that have fringing. When done, click icon next to quick mask
Select> Inverse.
Image> Adjustments> Hue/Saturation and pick the color closest to your fringe color Click eyedropper on the fringe color on your image.
drag Saturation slider to the left until the fringing goes.
Select> deselect
Save

4- Quick method for fringe elimination

Using lasso tool select area with fringing
Image> adjustments> Hue/Saturation
De saturate fringe color
Select> Deselect
save

5- Transverse chromatic aberration (Moire banding) Elimination

- Filters/blur/Gaussian Blur at 1.5 pixels radius

6-HDR

(Camera on tripod
Expose for highlights-take a shot
Expose for shadows-take a shot
Add highlight image to shadow image as a new layer (hold “shift” and drag move tool)
Select> Color Range, Click “highlights” check “invert”, click “OK”
Add layer mask.
Filter> Blur> Gaussian Blur 250 pixels.
Flatten and save.


7- Local Contrast Enhancement (Defog)

Ctrl+J
Filter> sharpen> Unsharp Mask
Amount 10
Radius 50 pixels
Threshold 0
Flatten and save


8-“Pop”

Ctrl+J
Filter> Sharpen> Unsharp mask
Amount 30
Radius 60 pixels
Threshold 10
Blend mode> Luminosity- Flatten

9- To sharpen - Smart sharpen

Ctrl+J
Unsharp mask amount 18%
Radius 40 pxls
Threshold 0
Unsharp mask amount 150%
Radius 0.3 pxls
Threshold 0
Edit> fade Unsharp mask 100% Darken
Unsharp mask amount 150%
Radius 0.3 pxls
Threshold 0
Edit> fade Unsharp mask 50% Lighten


10- Smart sharpen ( Alternative)

Ctrl+J
Select> All> Edit> Copy
Channels> New channel (alpha 1)> Edit> paste
Filter> Stylize> Find edges
Ctrl+L move sliders for clean edges
Filters> Blur Gaussian blur1.5 pixels
Select> Load selection-Check “invert” click “ok”
Select RGB channel
View> Show> “selection edges” uncheck
Filter> Sharpen> Unsharp mask- Amount 500
Radius 0.2
Threshold 0
Select> deselect> dump alpha channel
Blend mode “luminosity”
Ctrl+shift+E




11- To lighten under-exposed images

Ctrl+J
Blend mode Screen
Adjust opacity to suit before flattening/save


12- To darken over-exposed images

Ctrl+J
Blend mode Multiply
Adjust opacity to suit before flattening/save

13- To Vignette portrait images

Create an ellipse/rectangle around subject, using elliptical/rectangle Marquee tool
Select> Inverse
Feather radius 250 pixels
Edit> Cut

14- To reduce skin redness in portraits

Add new adjustment layer> selective color
Set to Reds
Click, hold drag magenta slider to left

15-To smooth skin in portraits

Ctrl+J
Click on quick mask
Brush tool 35 soft
Press ”D” Paint face except for eyes, eyebrows and nostrils, and lips
(If you go over the edges, press X and erase, then x again to continue…)
Press “Q
Select “inverse”
Select> feather 10 pixels
Filters> Blur> Gaussian Blur 3 pixels
Filter> Noise> Add noise 2.5%
“uniformed” and “monochrome” checked
Flatten/save

16-Polarizer

1.Ctrl+J
2. Window> Channels
3. Red Channel
4. Ctrl+A; Ctrl+C
5. Lab Colour (Don’t Flatten)
6. Channel> Lightness
7. Ctrl+V
8. Image> Mode> RGB (Don’t Flatten)
4

9. Select top layer- Layer> Layer mask Reveal All
10. Click on layer mask thumbnail
11. Image> Apply Image
12. Layer-background; channel red; “Invert” Ticked Blending-Multiply-opacity 100% Flatten and save.




17-Polarizer (Alternative)

1. Ctrl+J
2. Mode> soft light-click “OK”
3. Press ”D”
4. Press ”G” for gradient tool - Select Black to transparent Linear gradient
5. Mouse cursor at top of image, click-hold-drag down to horizon-release
6. Click on background layer; Click, hold on b/w circle
7. Choose selective colour Cyan/magenta 100/100 (Cyans)
Cyan/magenta 100/100 (Blues)

8.Flatten and save



18-Graduated Neutral Density Filter effect

Add adjustment layer> levels
Drag right slider to left
Drag middle slider to left (These moves enable you to get the ground or sea how you want it)
Press “D” or "X" to make foreground color black
Press “G” for gradient
Choose linear gradient -black to transparent-2nd icon from left
Drag cursor from top of image down to horizon
flatten/save

19- Black & White conversion from colour

Ctrl+J
Image> Calculations
Background layer
Red
Background Layer
Red
Multiply
New channel
Image> Mode> Greyscale
flatten/save

20- To black & White Quadtone

Ctrl+J
Image> Mode> Duotone
Choose type: Quadtone
Load> quadtones> pantones
Select last option Bl 541 513 5773. Hit LOAD. Hit OK.
Image> Mode> RGB Color
Flatten/save

5

21- To convert to Black & White then selectively colourize

New adjustment layer> Hue/Saturation
De-saturate
F7 (or click on layer mask)
Press ”D”
Click on brush tool
Brush over parts to colourize
Flatten/Save

22-To Isolate Objects against a white background:

First,Photograph your object using any background, Then:

a) Zoom in 200-300%.
b) Use the pen selection tool to chart an exact path around the object.
Get it perfect.
c) Click on working path Icon in paths palette
d) Select> Modify> Contract by 2 pixels.
e) Select> modify> Smooth by 3-5 pixels.
f) Select> Inverse-.
g) Select> Feather by 0.2 - 0.5 pixels.
h) Make sure foreground black/background white - Press Delete.
You now have isolated object on white background.

23-To Correct Converging verticals

"Select > All"
"View > Fit on Screen"
"View > Show > Grid" .
"Edit > Transform > Perspective"
Eight small squares will appear around the image edges.
Using the Left mouse button select the small square
at the top left or right corner and drag in the opposite
direction to the way the verticals are tilting.


24-Sepia/color

1 duplicate layer,
2. then select background copy layer and select background layer invisible
3. select layer and go
image -> adjustments -> Match color...
4. then set luminance to 200 and color intensity to 1
5. then select background layer to visible and take the eraser tool
6 on "background copy" layer start delete the all what you want in real colors

For landscapes

25-Step one- To bring out detail 1.

Ctrl+J
2. filter> other> high pass 1.7 pixels
3. Change blend mode to "hard light"
4. Ctrl+Shift+N
5. Edit> Fill - black 100%
6. Click on eraser tool-set brush size 300
7. Click once in centre of blacked-out image
6


8. change blend mode to "soft light" Adjust opacity to suit
9. Flatten and save

26-Step two- To enhance colors:


1. Ctrl+J

2. Image> adjustments> Match Color
Luminance 119
Color intensity 126
3. Flatten/save


27- Soft light portrait

Press ctrl+j to duplicate the layer and press shift +control +u to de-saturate the new layer.
Click on Add layer mask button
Click on layer mask thumbnail to active it and go to Image> Apply image :-
Layer- merged
RGB
Multiply
100%
Now, click on image thumbnail to active it. ( It is located just before the layer mask thumbnail ). Now do two things :-
1. Go to filter> Blur> Gaussian blur and give 2.5 radius.
2. Change the blending mode of the layer to Multiply.
Duplicate this layer again and change its blending mode to Linear dodge. You now have soft light effect on your image. If you want more light than change the blending mode to Color Dodge.

28-Infra-red Effect

1. Ctrl+j
2. New adjustment layer-Channel mixer
Check "monochrome"
3. Set Red to +100
Green to +200
Blue to -200
Set constant to between 27 and 32
Click “ok”
Flatten and save.

29-Faux F1.8 D.O.F.

1. Ctrl+J ; Add a layer mask-Using Pen tool, draw a path around subject, Edit> fill Black 100%
2. Selection> save selection, save to new channel
3. Select gradient tool, black to white, linear
4. From the area you want in focus, draw a line vertically downwards (1/3 in front;
5. Using gradient tool again, layer mode Screen, drawing a line upwards 2/3ds behind)
6. Channels-click on saved mask Ctrl+ click-select gradient mask, mask only
7. Set background color to black. Ctrl+ backspace
8. Click on original duplicated layer with its mask-name it “Gaussian Blur”
9. Now select image-not mask.-Lock Transparency. click little chequerboard, at top of layer palette
10. Filter> Blur> Gaussian blur 40-50 pixels
11. Repeat step 8,but name layer “Lens Blur”-Filter> blur> lens blur, and in the dialogue box:
12. “faster”, depth map source “layer mask” Blur focal distance-adjust to suit
13. Set iris shape to number of diaphragm blades of your lens. Radius 100%
7

14. Don’t play with “blade curvature or rotation” Brightness 2;Threshold 180
15. Click Ok-Flatten and save

30-Red eye Reduction

Double click Quick mask icon
Change masking color to green-opacity 60%
Paint mask over eyes
Click icon next to Quick mask
Select> Inverse
Image> adjustments> Desaturate
Add new adjustment layer-Levels
Move both input sliders towards the centre of the range until you are satisfied.
Layers> Flatten image

31-To Whiten Teeth

Ctrl+j
Select quick mask icon
Select brush tool 13 pixels soft
Brush over teeth
Click icon next to quick mask
Select> Inverse
Image> adjustments> Hue/Saturation -60
Add new adjustment layer-Levels
Click and drag right slider to left until whiteness looks good
Flatten and save

32-To “POP”Color Using Lab mode

Here's how to "pop" the color using LAB (Lightness-Alpha-Beta; (Not"Lab" color.

Image>mode>Lab color

Ctrl+ M -This brings up a grid-by holding the "Alt" button and clicking on the grid,you will get either large or small squares

Press "alt" and click on diagram to get small squares.

Selecting Channel "a",Hold and drag cursor a short distance ( about one and a half squares-right to left) along top right corner of grid,and do the same to bottom left corner(left to right). Channel "a" allows to to fine tune reds and greens. Just adjust until the color is good for you.

Repeat the exercise using channel "b"-this fine tunes the blues and yellows.

When you have got it how you want: Click "OK"

Image>Mode>RGB color




33-To Emulate Kodak Tri-X 35mm Black & White film

1. Desaturate color
Use either the hue/saturation or desaturate command to remove all color from the image. This will turn the digital image to black-and-white.
2. Add monochrome noise
The amount of noise you add is up to you, but I would suggest adding enough so that you can just start to detect it.
Be sure to use the "monochrome" option, otherwise the film grain will have random color.
3. Adjust levels
Although optional, this step can really add to the mood of the shot. Experiment using the adjust levels command to change the brightness and contrast of the image. Remember that each image is unique, and the best way to find the best level settings is to experiment.
Bleach Highlights
move the highlight slider to the left - this will start to cause the highlights to overexpose
Deepen Shadows
move the shadow slider a very small amount to the right - this will make the shadows a bit darker and increase the image contrast. Be careful not to overdo it, ideally you should barely be able to detect some grain in the black areas.
Adjust Midtones
adjust the midtone slider to taste - moving the midtone slider affects the overall brightness of the image.



34-To Emulate Fuji Velvia slide film

1. increase color saturation (optional)

To further exaggerate the color, increase the saturation by a few percent. This is optional as you will already see stronger color from step 1.

2. Sharpen (optional)

3. add monochrome noise (optional)
If you choose to add noise/film grain, try the "monochrome" noise option. In my opinion, this monochrome noise looks similar to the nice grain structure of some slide films.

4. adjust brightness/contrast
Increase the image contrast by a small amount - experiment with moving the brightness - also a slight amount. There is no perfect formula, trust your eye! You will see the colors already start to get more vivid with the slight increase in contrast.



These will solve most post-processing problems, Regards, Ken

Reply
Dec 6, 2015 17:07:56   #
wingclui44 Loc: CT USA
 
BobT wrote:
wingcliu44,

I don't see any reference to any sort of RAW processing on my Picasa 3 program. Where is it?

Bob

I am using PC with Window 7 before , now is W 10. I just go to my photo folder, then choose the file I want and right click the file to get the drop down manual, click the "open with" to show all the photo manage options I have. I just choose "Picasa photo viewer". It will be opened in Picasa, at the bottom, I click "edit in Picasa" to go the program.

Reply
Dec 6, 2015 20:21:29   #
cameranut Loc: North Carolina
 
BobT wrote:
Til now, I haven't had much interest in doing much post processing to my images. But have recently seen some before-and-after examples, and am becoming convinced that this might be more necessary than I had originally thought. I'm still not into RAW. So being a JPEGer, can I still get reasonable improvements with some degrees of post work? Or is RAW the only way to achieve the max. benefit?
I have dabbled in Picasa3, but that program leaves something to be desired. I have also downloaded PSE 10, but that seems way over my head; hence hasn't been touched.
Is there any easy, yet effective, and free, programs out there worthy of my consideration? The less the learning curve the better(yet I do expect there to be some). Thanks
Til now, I haven't had much interest in doing much... (show quote)


I do most of my pp. using Photo Gallery that comes with Windows. Windows Vista wasn't worth a darn but Windows 7 or later works for minor adjustments such as reducing blown out highlights or lightening shadows, cropping, contrast, etc. Sometimes I go to Elements 10 and use their "guided" on the right side. Most of that is pretty simple and works fairly well for removing small items (eyesores) in your photo. Many software programs will let you try their trial version to see if you like it before buying.

Reply
Dec 6, 2015 20:53:41   #
hank6595 Loc: Amesbury, MA
 
wingclui44 wrote:
Picasa! It's free and simple and opens raw file too.


Living (trying to survive) on social security, I am using Picasa and it will do what I attempt to accomplish.

tHANKs

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2015 08:19:16   #
wingclui44 Loc: CT USA
 
hank6595 wrote:
Living (trying to survive) on social security, I am using Picasa and it will do what I attempt to accomplish.

tHANKs


Me too on SS, just living with what we have happily, we will be Okay! :)

Reply
Dec 7, 2015 09:13:13   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
BobT wrote:
Til now, I haven't had much interest in doing much post processing to my images. But have recently seen some before-and-after examples, and am becoming convinced that this might be more necessary than I had originally thought. I'm still not into RAW. So being a JPEGer, can I still get reasonable improvements with some degrees of post work? Or is RAW the only way to achieve the max. benefit?
I have dabbled in Picasa3, but that program leaves something to be desired. I have also downloaded PSE 10, but that seems way over my head; hence hasn't been touched.
Is there any easy, yet effective, and free, programs out there worthy of my consideration? The less the learning curve the better(yet I do expect there to be some). Thanks
Til now, I haven't had much interest in doing much... (show quote)


The blunt answer is NO. If you're not willing to sit up and learn something with even the slightest effort of being a student of something you don't know yet, you can't just get a big red EASY button at Staples for free, push it, and get magical before-and-after results. The before-and-after results you saw were from people who may have edited that one photo for an hour or more with numerous editing functions of a quality program that they LEARNED how to do over a few months of experimentation and frustration until the light bulb went on above their heads and they "got it."

Free and super cheap programs many times don't even have rulers in them to resize a photo and without that to fit standard size papers for printing you're screwed and might as not even edit at all.

Free also doesn't mean easy. Free many times actually means confusing and harder than a paid software that has some better programming thought put into it by an actual photographers. GIMP is free, has very little instructions, still has bugs after years of existing, and is harder to use than Corel Paintshop Pro X8 that has been on Amazon this week for $28 and is a direct competitor to Photoshop with great abilities far beyond anything you could imagine at this point.

While I'm not expecting you to become a Photoshop expert, you couldn't get into a better, easier to understand editor than PS Elements and you won't even read past the welcome page of the manual on it so why bother? Just push the auto-adjust button on the printing kiosk at WalMart or Costco and let it do the editing for you.

There's also nothing wrong with editing JPGs. It was the standard of digital photography until recent years and many professionals made a lot of money with JPG, PNG, and TIF before RAW came along. So don't worry about RAW.

Reply
Dec 7, 2015 09:51:09   #
alfeng Loc: Out where the West commences ...
 
marcomarks wrote:
The blunt answer is NO. If you're not willing to sit up and learn something with even the slightest effort of being a student of something you don't know yet, you can't just get a big red EASY button at Staples for free, push it, and get magical before-and-after results. The before-and-after results you saw were from people who may have edited that one photo for an hour or more with numerous editing functions of a quality program that they LEARNED how to do over a few months of experimentation and frustration until the light bulb went on above their heads and they "got it."

Free and super cheap programs many times don't even have rulers in them to resize a photo and without that to fit standard size papers for printing you're screwed and might as not even edit at all.

Free also doesn't mean easy. Free many times actually means confusing and harder than a paid software that has some better programming thought put into it by an actual photographers. GIMP is free, has very little instructions, still has bugs after years of existing, and is harder to use than Corel Paintshop Pro X8 that has been on Amazon this week for $28 and is a direct competitor to Photoshop with great abilities far beyond anything you could imagine at this point.

While I'm not expecting you to become a Photoshop expert, you couldn't get into a better, easier to understand editor than PS Elements and you won't even read past the welcome page of the manual on it so why bother? Just push the auto-adjust button on the printing kiosk at WalMart or Costco and let it do the editing for you.

There's also nothing wrong with editing JPGs. It was the standard of digital photography until recent years and many professionals made a lot of money with JPG, PNG, and TIF before RAW came along. So don't worry about RAW.
The blunt answer is NO. If you're not willing to ... (show quote)

Again, IRFANVIEW is free and (IMO) very EASY to use ...

The only (?) thing which I cannot do is to cut out an irregular (i.e., non-rectangular ... i.e., a shape with curved edges) shape and paste it in a different location (which is to say, ANY rectangular shape can be VERY easily cut-and-paste) .

.....I believe that my sister has some iteration of Photoshop -- she can cut-and-paste irregular shapes.

The learning curve for the simplest editing of an image with IRFANVIEW has got to be less than a few minutes unless a person is uncomfortable with using a mouse and a graphical user interface ...

For OTHER (more sophisticated) editing tasks with IRFANVIEW, it is probably only a minute-or-two of trial-and-error for each task for a typical individual ... AFAIK, there is no dedicated readme.txt (which is not necessary because there appears to be a comprehensive "Help" menu which I have never used ... yet).




Reply
Dec 7, 2015 11:07:56   #
orrie smith Loc: Kansas
 
be advised that jpeg images may lose quality over time, raw will not. that being said, be careful with free programs, research completely, as some of them are imbedded with viruses, malware, and irratating ads.
find an inexpensive program like photoshop elements or lightroom and you will have a program that you may use for years with great results.

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2015 11:25:06   #
hank6595 Loc: Amesbury, MA
 
orrie smith wrote:
be advised that jpeg images may lose quality over time, raw will not. that being said, be careful with free programs, research completely, as some of them are imbedded with viruses, malware, and irratating ads.
find an inexpensive program like photoshop elements or lightroom and you will have a program that you may use for years with great results.


At 75+ I'm not going to get to concerned about how long the images will last. I will do my best to preserve what I have and sit here and sip on my bloody mary as the world
goes by. I have been using picasa for many years and see
no deteriation in the images. I use an Epson printer, Epson paper and Epson ink and from what I see, they should last me a life time. tHANKs

Reply
May 19, 2016 18:54:37   #
bassman_soundking Loc: Sacramento
 
Thanks everyone for offering up advice and opinions on different PP apps!

Reply
May 19, 2016 20:17:51   #
pecohen Loc: Central Maine
 
orrie smith wrote:
be advised that jpeg images may lose quality over time, raw will not. that being said, be careful with free programs, research completely, as some of them are imbedded with viruses, malware, and irratating ads.
find an inexpensive program like photoshop elements or lightroom and you will have a program that you may use for years with great results.

The only way a digital image will ever degrade is if the storage medium fails. Losing even a single bit from a file can make it unusable as-is and trying to access it may give you a "unrecognized format" error. This can happen with a RAW image just as it can happen with a JPEG or TIFF or any other image. Such failures are apt to affect more than a single bit and when a failure does happen it is likely that many bits in the file are affected. Think about a scratch on an optical disk, possibly affecting thousands of bits. However, good error recovery algorithms are used with such disks that allow them to recover from such physical abuse.

In some instances there may be software that can recover from the failure, but any image data that is lost is lost - it simply will not be recovered. The recovery software will probably fill it with arbitrary, perhaps random values - the image will be corrupted, but with the recovery software you will at least be able to see the corrupted image.

If the image is compressed in some way then losing a bit here or there can cause massive corruption of any recovered image. RAW images are (usually) not compressed and that may be the reason for saying that they will be safer over time than JPEG images - an image file that is corrupted is apt to be recovered in better shape than a compressed image file that is corrupted. JPEG images are compressed in a manner that a single bit that is changed in the file is apt to show up as several 8 x 8 pixel blocks being corrupted, perhaps only one or two but in extreme instances a large part of the image.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.