Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Your Favorite (I'll never give it up) Lens
Page <<first <prev 5 of 8 next> last>>
Dec 1, 2015 10:44:05   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
the one I have om my camera at the time I really really need it

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 10:46:06   #
Tom47 Loc: Gettysburg, PA
 
70-300 MM Nikon with my 7200. I do mostly wildlife and need the reach.

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 10:53:29   #
IJC1962 Loc: Motown
 
Nikon 28-70 f2.8 - have had this for more than 10 years, have acquired a few more lenses but this is still my "go to" lens

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2015 11:01:23   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
Hmarge wrote:
Just wondering, if you had a choice of having only one lens for your camera, which one would you keep and why?


All my lenses serve a purpose but there is none that I would never give up.

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 11:02:37   #
huskyrider705 Loc: Phenix City, Alabama
 
LFingar wrote:
It would be easier for me to pick the one lens that I would get rid of first. Since I have a 24-105 f/4, my 24-70 f/4 would be the only one I would be willing to part with. I would not even consider getting rid of any of my other ones.

Just curious, why would you choose the 24-105 over the 24-70? The reason I ask is because I was thinking of trading my 24-105 for the 24-70 f/4 because it's supposed to be sharper edge to edge, have less distortion and the almost macro built in if needed. I know you lose 35mm length but I can use my 100-400 when I need extra reach. Is there something I should be concerned about?

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 11:03:04   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
jim quist wrote:
If the house was on fire and I had to grab just one camera and lens on my out of the house, the lens would be the 70-200 2.8


If my house was on fire I would not even look for my cameras. THe only 2 things I care a bout are my wife and myself. Everything else can be replaced. My favorite lens is the one I haven't bought yet.

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 11:07:28   #
huskyrider705 Loc: Phenix City, Alabama
 
LFingar wrote:
It would be easier for me to pick the one lens that I would get rid of first. Since I have a 24-105 f/4, my 24-70 f/4 would be the only one I would be willing to part with. I would not even consider getting rid of any of my other ones.

Just curious, why would you choose the 24-105 over the 24-70? The reason I ask is because I was thinking of trading my 24-105 for the 24-70 f/4 because it's supposed to be sharper edge to edge, have less distortion and the almost macro built in if needed. I know you lose 35mm length but I can use my 100-400 when I need extra reach. Is there something I should be concerned about?
The 100-400 II would be my keeper.
Sorry, double post.

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2015 11:16:17   #
shutterbob Loc: Tucson
 
Nikon 24-70 f2.8. Covers almost everything I need. Fast, sharp, low distortion, almost no CA. Almost never leaves the front of my D750.

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 11:29:44   #
coj Loc: NJ, USA
 
Ditto.

St3v3M wrote:
My zoom for it's flexibility. S-

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 11:35:28   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
The 24-70mm would leave a gap in coverage of 30mm between it and the 100-400mm II.

Rent to try the 24-70mm f/4 before you switch to it.

www.borrowlenses.com

www.lensrentals.com

Happy Holidays!
huskyrider705 wrote:
Just curious, why would you choose the 24-105 over the 24-70? The reason I ask is because I was thinking of trading my 24-105 for the 24-70 f/4 because it's supposed to be sharper edge to edge, have less distortion and the almost macro built in if needed. I know you lose 35mm length but I can use my 100-400 when I need extra reach. Is there something I should be concerned about?
The 100-400 II would be my keeper.
Sorry, double post.

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 11:51:51   #
GEEJAY Loc: witness protection
 
28-300 nikkor

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2015 11:52:39   #
GEEJAY Loc: witness protection
 
28-300 nikkor

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 11:58:10   #
mmeador
 
I have the 70-210 Nikkor. You are right, unbelievable lens.

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 11:59:14   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
anotherview wrote:
The 24-70mm would leave a gap in coverage of 30mm between it and the 100-400mm II.

Rent to try the 24-70mm f/4 before you switch to it.

www.borrowlenses.com

www.lensrentals.com

Happy Holidays!


There really is no need to have every possible focal length covered, though I am sure lens manufacturers would like people to think there is.

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 12:03:35   #
Collie lover Loc: St. Louis, MO
 
Hmarge wrote:
Just wondering, if you had a choice of having only one lens for your camera, which one would you keep and why?


My Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary because I like to take pictures of animals and other things I can't get close to.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.