Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Need Advice from Mac Aperture Users...
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 20, 2015 06:12:50   #
tonyjag Loc: Bolton, Ma.
 
I have looked at LR and prefer to stay with Aperture for now on my MacBook Pro with OS10.10.3. I sometimes use PSE9, e.g. to add text. Now I need to do a lens distortion correction and swap a couple of heads of those with eyes closed, etc. in a group shot of 31 people. Do I finally need to buy PhotoShop? :?:

Reply
Nov 20, 2015 08:46:33   #
Bob Yankle Loc: Burlington, NC
 
tonyjag wrote:
I have looked at LR and prefer to stay with Aperture for now on my MacBook Pro with OS10.10.3. I sometimes use PSE9, e.g. to add text. Now I need to do a lens distortion correction and move a couple of heads of those with eyes closed, etc. in a group shot of 31 people. Do I finally need to buy PhotoShop? :?:
Nope. PSE 14 will do it.

Reply
Nov 21, 2015 07:24:00   #
katbandit Loc: new york city
 
i also love my aperture 3 on my Mac...refuse to give it up until i will no longer have a choice..meantime i have photoshop elements both 8 and 12 on two different computers . both work fine for the texts and all the other things like swapping out heads etc..i was told even by the camera store near me that holds camera classes to hold on to that aperture program..

Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2015 07:46:45   #
tonyjag Loc: Bolton, Ma.
 
Thank you both. I downloaded PSE14, which was on sale and cheaper than upgrading.

Reply
Nov 21, 2015 10:45:54   #
tonyjag Loc: Bolton, Ma.
 
OK, I was able to get everything installed, set-up, and working...almost. After editing in PSE14, when I save per the Aperture instructions, it does not put the edited image back into Aperture, which shows the original image plus a new identical one in TIFF, but without the edits done in PSE14. What am i doing wrong? :?:

Reply
Nov 21, 2015 11:18:16   #
EAM Loc: Milwaukee W
 
I was told not to upgrade to El Capitan as then I might have problems with using Aperture. Any truth to this?

Reply
Nov 21, 2015 12:12:08   #
busmaster2 Loc: College Point NY
 
EAM wrote:
I was told not to upgrade to El Capitan as then I might have problems with using Aperture. Any truth to this?


Absolutely no problems. I've used aperture in every version of OS with no problems.

Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2015 12:12:23   #
busmaster2 Loc: College Point NY
 
EAM wrote:
I was told not to upgrade to El Capitan as then I might have problems with using Aperture. Any truth to this?


Absolutely no problems. I've used aperture in every version of OS with no problems.

Reply
Nov 21, 2015 12:27:47   #
mackolb
 
Ditto, busmaster2. Been using Aperture in El Capitan with no problems since the first beta of 10.11. Now on 10.11.2 and NO PROBLEM with ANYTHING and Aperture works as always, seamlessly.

Reply
Nov 21, 2015 14:05:54   #
rleonetti Loc: Portland, Oregon
 
busmaster2 wrote:
Absolutely no problems. I've used aperture in every version of OS with no problems.


Not quite: you must turn off the image preview. The various color previews seem to turn the image pale or washed out.

Reply
Nov 21, 2015 14:15:26   #
mcveed Loc: Kelowna, British Columbia (between trips)
 
katbandit wrote:
i also love my aperture 3 on my Mac...refuse to give it up until i will no longer have a choice..meantime i have photoshop elements both 8 and 12 on two different computers . both work fine for the texts and all the other things like swapping out heads etc..i was told even by the camera store near me that holds camera classes to hold on to that aperture program..


You will probably have no choice when you purchase your next camera and find that Aperture can't read your image files.

Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2015 14:15:41   #
EAM Loc: Milwaukee W
 
Thank you all. Just being careful

Reply
Nov 21, 2015 15:22:17   #
mackolb
 
I'm using an iPhone 6s and Nikon D750 with no problems.
Apple must keep it's raw converters up-to-date at the OS level so that Photos can continue to support ALL photographers. And, of course, .jpg is .jpg.
Because the image file interpreters/converters are at the MacOS level, one should expect that all applications that use images, certainly including both Photos and Aperture, will work just as one would expect.
Please try to understand that the MacOS is essentially future proof and the only things that seem to have been left behind were those things that only worked in 32bit mode once Apple moved to all-64 bit operations.

Reply
Nov 22, 2015 17:35:01   #
tonyjag Loc: Bolton, Ma.
 
Again, I was able to get everything installed, set-up, and working...almost. After editing in PSE14, when I save per the Aperture instructions, it does not put the edited image back into Aperture, which shows the original image plus a new identical one in TIFF, but without the edits done in PSE14. What am i doing wrong?

I have been able to work around it by saving PSE14-edited images in .tiff to a file, then re-importing them into Aperture. But That's clunky compared to how it's supposed to work. I'm not sure whether to contact Adobe or Apple. :?:

BTW, I am using 10.10.3, Yosemite, but that seems to be a non-issue.

Reply
Nov 22, 2015 19:26:09   #
mackolb
 
Sorry for the problem, Tony.
I can do a secondary click on an Aperture image and edit with Photoshop 6, save it, and when I close the document in Photoshop, it shows up as another image in Aperture. No renaming, exporting or file mapping change to .tif needed.
If you're shooting camera RAW, which I highly recommend, at least from Aperture to Photoshop and back, after closing the edited image in PS, then shows up again in Aperture, but now includes the Photoshop attributes including layers if I want to go back to Photoshop.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.