Tower Bridge, which version?
Nov 5, 2015 12:45:43 #
Nov 5, 2015 15:03:42 #
Nov 5, 2015 15:55:56 #
gemlenz wrote:
I like version 2, but it looks like it needs a perspective adjustment. The bridge looks lopsided. JMHO.
Thanks gemlenz. You're right it is a bit lopsided - I'm going to post a new version based on the comments.
Nov 5, 2015 15:55:59 #
One more vote for #! although something in between might be better. I find the dark and featureless foreground water to be distracting on #2.
Nov 5, 2015 15:56:33 #
Nov 5, 2015 15:57:11 #
shieldsadvert wrote:
I like #2 but try lightening it overall and slightly burning in the dark water
Many thanks - new lighter version on its way.
Nov 5, 2015 15:57:46 #
iDoc wrote:
One more vote for #! although something in between might be better. I find the dark and featureless foreground water to be distracting on #2.
Thank you iDoc - in between coming.
Nov 5, 2015 16:03:40 #
Luggerbugs wrote:
Two versions of Tower Bridge - just wondering which you prefer. Many thanks.
I don't like either one because the towers aren't vertical and because Tower Bridge is much more attractive in color.
That said I like the second less because it is too dark.
Nov 5, 2015 16:06:52 #
Mark7829 wrote:
There is no question #2 because of the detail in the sky. However that makes much of the rest of the image too dark. This is easily corrected in PS. In the future , faced with the same situation, drop in an ND Grade hard filter or in PS apply a ND effect on the sky. You can also shoot HDR for better overall exposure.
HDR or, if using a Nikon, high ADL would be better because the GND would also darken the towers. And you want the water toned down too in the first exposure.
Nov 5, 2015 16:10:34 #
Luggerbugs wrote:
Thanks gemlenz. You're right it is a bit lopsided - I'm going to post a new version based on the comments.
If interested you might try posting an unedited one in the Post Processing forum and ask the folks to take their cut at it and tell you what they did. Sometimes yields very interesting ideas.
I'd prefer the unedited color version if you have it.
You can also post the one you like best and ask for comments on it. The general rules for that forum prefer you to post the original and post processed when you want feedback on your processing.
Nov 5, 2015 16:13:14 #
MtnMan wrote:
If interested you might try posting an unedited one in the Post Processing forum and ask the folks to take their cut at it and tell you what they did. Sometimes yields very interesting ideas.
I'd prefer the unedited color version if you have it.
You can also post the one you like best and ask for comments on it. The general rules for that forum prefer you to post the original and post processed when you want feedback on your processing.
I'd prefer the unedited color version if you have it.
You can also post the one you like best and ask for comments on it. The general rules for that forum prefer you to post the original and post processed when you want feedback on your processing.
Thanks Mtnman.
Nov 5, 2015 16:30:35 #
13oct1931
Loc: Lebanon, Indiana
I like #2 best; show the entire structure.
Have you ever been inside? very interesting!
Alyn
Have you ever been inside? very interesting!
Alyn
Nov 5, 2015 16:36:08 #
13oct1931 wrote:
I like #2 best; show the entire structure.
Have you ever been inside? very interesting!
Alyn
Have you ever been inside? very interesting!
Alyn
Many thanks Alyn - no I haven't.
Nov 5, 2015 20:48:18 #
Nov 5, 2015 22:08:58 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.