That's the trouble with kids today...............no style.
Jul 20, 2015 10:27:12 #
Yeppers, born in 44 and remember well these items. There are now as they were then, truly, amazingly ugly. None of them were ever on me...well maybe except for a few sets of Levis Big Bells......
Jul 20, 2015 10:29:48 #
rmalarz wrote:
Greg, I don't know. A lot of those fashions looked a bit light in the loafers for me. However, I'd probably wear them, but not often. I'm more a Levis and tee shirt kind of guy.
--Bob
--Bob
LOL Bob................light in the loafers was a favourite expression of my Dads, still love it. They're all a bit Star Trek meets The Village People.
Jul 20, 2015 10:31:19 #
nikonwaddy wrote:
Yeppers, born in 44 and remember well these items. There are now as they were then, truly, amazingly ugly. None of them were ever on me...well maybe except for a few sets of Levis Big Bells......
:XD: :thumbup:
Jul 20, 2015 12:05:02 #
Jul 20, 2015 13:06:00 #
"To each his own!" Said the man as he kissed the cow.
I would not wear that to a dogs weding :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :?:
I would not wear that to a dogs weding :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :?:
Jul 20, 2015 13:13:02 #
cockney greg wrote:
http://www.newslinq.com/mens-fashion-ads/
Apparently "style" has gone the way of the 8-track. Style is no longer a concern.
Jul 20, 2015 16:06:14 #
cameranut wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: And you know what the bottoms of those pants get on them when they enter the bathroom stalls----YUCK
But the critters wearing those pants are what generally left the stalls in such condition that letting your cuffs touch the floor is perilous. . .
Jul 20, 2015 16:08:06 #
Jul 20, 2015 16:08:54 #
bull drink water wrote:
every generation thinks the last three had no style.
And thinks the next three have none either.
Jul 20, 2015 16:10:09 #
PRETENDER wrote:
I don't know where these fashions were from but I'm not sorry I missed them.
The 1970's. And some of them were European aberrations.
Jul 20, 2015 16:10:49 #
cockney greg wrote:
LOL Bob................light in the loafers was a favourite expression of my Dads, still love it. They're all a bit Star Trek meets The Village People.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jul 20, 2015 16:20:48 #
rickerb
Loc: utah
rmalarz wrote:
Greg, I don't know. A lot of those fashions looked a bit light in the loafers for me. However, I'd probably wear them, but not often. I'm more a Levis and tee shirt kind of guy.
--Bob
--Bob
I was wondering about #2. Is that Bruce Jenner.?
Jul 20, 2015 16:42:47 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Whatever time period that is (1970's?), I lived through it, and this is all foreign to me. These "fashions" were not part of any world I knew.
Just How old are you / Just wondering
Jul 20, 2015 16:55:42 #
hlmichel wrote:
I'll take the massive collars and bellbottom pants over 'pants on the ground' any day.
Bring back the 70's!!!!
Bring back the 70's!!!!
I agree. But when crooks wear them they are easy to catch.
Jul 20, 2015 17:58:12 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.