Sigma vs Nikon (Page 8): He was a PITA that was banned, but upon reflection he was from G.B.(England)...

jethro779 Loc: Tucson, AZ

ptcanon3ti wrote:

I don't know who JR1 is.

He was a PITA that was banned, but upon reflection he was from G.B.(England)

Mark7829 Loc: Calfornia

ptcanon3ti wrote:

I don't know who JR1 is.

No idea who JR1 is - I am who I am and have not changed names, personality or behavior since I have been a member. Just ask MTshooter, Imagemiester or that Bram Bam.

ptcanon3ti Loc: NJ

jethro779 wrote:

He was a PITA that was banned, but upon reflection he was from G.B.(England)

Yah...no idea who he was. But its hard to believe someone was banned from UHH.

ptcanon3ti Loc: NJ

Mark7829 wrote:

No idea who JR1 is - I am who I am and have not changed names, personality or behavior since I have been a member. Just ask MTshooter, Imagemiester or that Bram Bam.

Well Mark, there's always a chance for new beginnings!

washy Loc: Dorset UK

Mark7829 wrote:

Nah... the labs report lack of sharpness at 600 mm for this lens. To say it is the same at 400 as Nikon or Canon misses the point. This not a 400 mm lens it is a 600 and that is why people buy it. It is also at f6.3 necessitating a higher ISO and longer shutter sped than a f/4 in low light. It also limits your ability to add a TC. It is cheaper but that's about it. Go for it but it is no way equivalent to Nikon on Canon. though many like yourself will try to make that argument.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Tamron 150-600 from about 150 yards away, sharp enough?

I believe we started on Tamron and Sigma V Canon /Nickon

(Download)

Bram boy Loc: Vancouver Island B.C. Canada

jethro779 wrote:

Is it just me or does the Mark whatever sound like JR1?

Of course it does , any one who has to get on here and blow his own horn to a bunch of strangers, about his life accomplishments , there is defiantly a few
Loose connections in his gray matter . And it unfolds as it should for all to
See in its . The only one who doesent know it is the subject in question . If they every see the truth . They are usually the last to figure it out .

Mark7829 Loc: Calfornia

Bram boy wrote:

Of course it does , any one who has to get on here and blow his own horn to a bunch of strangers, about his life accomplishments , there is defiantly a few
Loose connections in his gray matter . And it unfolds as it should for all to
See in its . The only one who doesent know it is the subject in question . If they every see the truth . They are usually the last to figure it out .

Listen boy ... (love how that sounds) ...I don't care..... lololol

Mark7829 Loc: Calfornia

washy wrote:

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Tamron 150-600 from about 150 yards away, sharp enough?

You ruined the image when you over sharpened in Lightroom. There is a white outline around the legs and the neck is just gross. Come on you're trolling us right? You really are making a joke of the lens right? I get it. lololol

So funny - thanks for sharing.

washy Loc: Dorset UK

Mark7829 wrote:

You ruined the image when you over sharpened in Lightroom. There is a white outline around the legs and the neck is just gross. Come on you're trolling us right? You really are making a joke of the lens right? I get it. lololol

So funny - thanks for sharing.

Just proving your wrong along with all the crap you been mouthing, and now like every one else I'm leaving you to your own unsatisfactory life. After all your only on here to upset folks, in fact I think your are JR1 who supposedly came from Cornwall. Go get your eyes tested and a shovel for your mouth.

Mark7829 Loc: Calfornia

washy wrote:

Just proving your wrong along with all the crap you been mouthing, and now like every one else I'm leaving you to your own unsatisfactory life. After all your only on here to upset folks, in fact I think your are JR1 who supposedly came from Cornwall. Go get your eyes tested and a shovel for your mouth.

Wrong about what? lololol .... The image is garbage!!!! Anyone can see it was over sharpened. The neck is gross. The bird has a fine white outline, noticeable at the legs. Just zoom in on it, the dark and light pixels just pop out.If anyone else would like to look at the image, please comment on my observation.

Do you not know that when you post the original, others can look at the metadata? It is indicates Lightroom 6.1 was used. Do you not see that or know how to extract that information?

Here are two images of a blue heron. One is unsharpened and one is sharpened. The sharpened iages has the same white outline on the legs as the image you posted. The other image has not been dharpened at all and it has no white outline.

You sharpened your image to prove that the lens was sharp. But that sharpness came from software, not the lens. What are you trying to prove?

(Download)