Will we see a Nikon D5 this year?
Jul 7, 2015 13:27:45 #
ptcanon3ti wrote:
Right...or a bridge camera that has a 24-2000 equivalent lens.To keep up the numbers game with canon.
Why would anyone need ISO One Million? :shock:
Why would anyone need ISO One Million? :shock:
Jul 7, 2015 13:43:24 #
there is a site dedicated to Nikon rumors. I think it is nikonrumors.com. also nikonians.com is the largest Nikon shooters web site. I heard a rumor that Nikon is about to introduce the D-TCB where every photo you take an image of elvis gets superimposed over your shot!!!
Jul 7, 2015 14:12:38 #
cjkorb wrote:
Right...or a bridge camera that has a 24-2000 equivalent lens.
Exactly!
Jul 7, 2015 14:12:59 #
sinatraman wrote:
there is a site dedicated to Nikon rumors. I think it is nikonrumors.com. also nikonians.com is the largest Nikon shooters web site. I heard a rumor that Nikon is about to introduce the D-TCB where every photo you take an image of elvis gets superimposed over your shot!!!
:lol:
Jul 7, 2015 15:13:24 #
ptcanon3ti wrote:
To keep up the numbers game with canon.
Why would anyone need ISO One Million? :shock:
Why would anyone need ISO One Million? :shock:
Do you think the numbers game will ever stop .
Jul 7, 2015 16:29:20 #
no it wont stop. The MP wars started up again with those 2 new canons and I believe sony has a very high mp coming out. sort of like horsepower in muscle cars. Dodge holds the lead at 706hp for the hellcat until Ford and Shelby top it.
I wish there was a rumor that Nikon was goin to introduce the F7 but that is very unlikely. The f6 will be the last film camera Nikon will make :thumbdown: :twisted: :twisted: :XD:
I wish there was a rumor that Nikon was goin to introduce the F7 but that is very unlikely. The f6 will be the last film camera Nikon will make :thumbdown: :twisted: :twisted: :XD:
Jul 7, 2015 18:19:16 #
cjkorb wrote:
Why would a professional sports photographer need more than 10 fps when shooting sports?
When shooting random action (you know it is going to happen, but not exactly when) at 10FPS, the best image usually happened BETWEENl the frames. So increasing the frame rate might catch a moment otherwise missed.
Jul 7, 2015 18:45:53 #
JPL wrote:
to more than ISO 1.000.000
As you say, pretty much total darkness capabilities.
to more than ISO 1.000.000
As you say, pretty much total darkness capabilities.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Right now, I am laughing SOOO hard that.....oops, hang on guys......, I gotta go change my diaper!!!!
According to the REAL Nikon Rumors(not the Montana rumor mill), it will have the SAME, processor, so how in the world are they gonna get 50% more fps outta it with ANY more mp using the same processor??!!
You guys have been spoon fed for so long, you're looking a little plump!!!! :lol:
SS
Jul 7, 2015 19:16:46 #
CaptainC wrote:
I understand but at 10 fps, I don't think there is much your going to miss between frames. A pro sports photographer can anticipate the action...a batter swinging at a ball, a receiver going up for the football. I maybe wrong but going over 10-12 fps is approaching overkill.When shooting random action (you know it is going to happen, but not exactly when) at 10FPS, the best image usually happened BETWEENl the frames. So increasing the frame rate might catch a moment otherwise missed.
Jul 7, 2015 19:48:57 #
ptcanon3ti wrote:
To keep up the numbers game with canon.
Why would anyone need ISO One Million? :shock:
Why would anyone need ISO One Million? :shock:
Hand held Milky Way shots, anyone? :mrgreen:
Good luck separating the stars from the noise, though.....
Jul 7, 2015 23:47:12 #
sonic wrote:
Do you think the numbers game will ever stop .
Only after the tech hits its ceiling.
Jul 8, 2015 02:44:29 #
cjkorb wrote:
Why would a professional sports photographer need more than 10 fps when shooting sports?
For one thing, that would do a pretty good job of stop action on a golf swing. Remember those Golf Digest images years ago?
Jul 8, 2015 05:47:36 #
MT Shooter wrote:
Sensor resolution will be increased, at least 18 o... (show quote)
Hi,
Can I quote this as a rumour ?
Jul 8, 2015 05:49:32 #
SteveR wrote:
For one thing, that would do a pretty good job of stop action on a golf swing. Remember those Golf Digest images years ago?
In my youth we saw photos of Arnold Palmer in mid down swing with a bent shaft , little realising that it was the effect of the limited capabilities if the cameras . I spent years trying to bend my shafts and, 50 years on , am still recovering from the damage to ligaments and tendons.
Jul 8, 2015 05:57:39 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
With technology moving quickly Nikon will be out soon with a new flag ship. But Nikon will also bring out a new step down flagship model. In this case, it will be the 820, it will have similar features of the flagship but not all. It will be aimed as always at the advanced photographer. It will be priced at a point of savings over the flagship model. Nikon has done this well for over 60 years. Giving the non pro an option to feel like a pro and not break the bank. With this said my old 800 needs a face lift, can't wait.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.