Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Kodakrome slides
Page <prev 2 of 2
Apr 6, 2012 14:55:05   #
tomk
 
Another problem to consider is the problem in scanning Kodakrome slides. As I remember it,the dust and scratch removal programs included with the scanner and 3rd party programs don't work with kodakrome slides! I believe it's because the slides have the colors in layers [a seperate layer for each color, ie cmyk layers] and the light used to detect the defects can't handle the layers properly.

Reply
Apr 6, 2012 15:02:17   #
billwassmann Loc: Emerson, NJ
 
Will someone please correct the spelling? It's Kodachrome, not Kodakrome. Grrrr.

Reply
Apr 6, 2012 17:33:05   #
r.reeder Loc: Mesa, Arizona
 
6) I still saved all the scanned slides - not sure why, but I spent so much time with them, I must become emotionally attached. But they are now digitized and expendable. Whew!
----------------------------------------------------------

Because the slides are the original source material for the computer files, I would keep them for as long as I could. There are many horror stories of files being there one moment, gone the next. Backups notwithstanding, someday after you've tossed the slides, you'll be thinking how you would give anything to get those slides back. You know I'm right.

Reply
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Apr 6, 2012 18:14:10   #
MattSeven Loc: Scotland UK
 
Carl A wrote:
I have many Kodakrome slides . Is there a atachment
that I can get to copy them . I have a Nikon d5100 camrea

Are these KodachromeII 25ASA (or was it 32ASA?) -I loved that film and was so sad when they stopped it! The thing at the time for me was its great under exposure capability as the colour did not change as in most other slide films- when under exposed their colour usually turned green in the shadows!
That too, is a task I have to do!

Reply
Apr 6, 2012 19:20:42   #
ghill42 Loc: Colorado
 
Ok, anything to avoid waterboarding! It's Scancafe. Aaronwolf described it well except I think my slides were less than thirty cents each.

Reply
Apr 6, 2012 20:53:54   #
francesca3 Loc: Sausalito, CA
 
Festina Lente wrote:
I recently finished sorting over 13,600 35mm slides - it was a 5 year project. I learned a lot. Here are some highlights:

1) Be brutal in what you toss out. The quality of many slides is disappointing compared to today's digital technology. Especially if they were taken on something less than a quality SLR. I pitched about 80%.

2) Get a light table (or make a giant one) for sorting and culling. Also get a loupe to look at them before deciding to scan them.

3) Now for the surviving 20%. Slide scanners are great. But flat beds are faster. I batched 20 slides at a time on a flat bed scanner and let her rip. Pretty easy and automated.

4) For the really special slides, I rescanned them with a slide scanner (I preferred Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400 over the Nikon Super CoolScan 4000 ED. I still own both of these scanners, but they are no longer made. Today I would probably buy a Plustek OpticFilm 7600i scanner. The difference between the flat bed scanner and the dedicated slide scanners is very notable.

5) I spent far more time labeling the scanned images than anything else. I tried to capture notes from the slides, processing dates, etc. as I went along (next to impossible to do afterwards).

6) I still saved all the scanned slides - not sure why, but I spent so much time with them, I must become emotionally attached. But they are now digitized and expendable. Whew!

7) Between sorting, culling, scanning, reviewing images, labeling and cataloging images using information on each slide, I spent far more then a minute per slide. So if you have 1,000 slides, cull out 80%, and scan 200, you can get that done in a couple weeks in your spare time. Look at the Epson V700 or V600 flatbed scanners if you don't have one - for 1,000 slides it is not worth buying a dedicated slide scanner in my opinion.

8) Oh, and if you want to buy a used dedicated slide scanner, be sure the manufacturer still supports the driver software for your current operating system. I understand that Nikon stopped supporting the CoolScan.

So was it all worth it? I think so, and I don't want to know otherwise (because there are a pile of unidentified 35mm negatives awaiting similiar treatment.... sigh...)
I recently finished sorting over 13,600 35mm slide... (show quote)


Thanks for your thorough explanation ---> (I learn sooo much on this site!). I have a lot of old slides but may leave them for a year or twenty, although I do want to scan the fractal slides I got from MIT. Maybe.
At least now I know how to do it.

Reply
Apr 7, 2012 01:00:18   #
Hal81 Loc: Bucks County, Pa.
 
I also have well over 3000 slides and about that many 35mm negs. My son gave me his scanner, wouldnt work with his computer and it wont work for me. So Im looking to buy one but not sure what one to get.

Reply
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Apr 7, 2012 03:01:51   #
Bunko.T Loc: Western Australia.
 
I have 1000s also from my past travels.I bought a Canon MP970 scan/copy /printer because it had scan slides capability. Yes it is time consuming & yes a big %age were ditched but with a high res scan, I now have them dig'd. It does 5 at a time & also does 35mm strips either neg or pos. About $400 aust at the time but I use it for all my photo work.I still have the slides until I go to the next stage of life. [the end]. Then the kids will probably dump them. Great memories tho'.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.