Iowegan wrote:
In my situation, it wasn't a matter of injury, or, loss to me, financially speaking.
My concerns, and I truly believe the woman who owns the photo studio understood them, is that to claim ownership, via pasting your business name or copyright to an image you didn't create, is, at best, unethical.
Trying to sell someone else's work and, or, talent for your own gain, is conversion of ownership, at least as I understand it.
I didn't lose any money because I wasn't trying to sell that talent, or whatever you wish to call it. I objected to her claiming she did the work, when clearly she didn't.
I made no demands of payment, I just asked that she either remove my picture(s), OR, place my name with credit of same. That's all. I wasn't trying to pinch her for an easy buck.
She removed the picture(s), and that's fine.
Again, I believe she was unaware of the situation, and got caught in something she hadn't complete control of at the time.
BTW, she's a real nice person, and is a pretty good photographer. I see a good future for her. :)
In my situation, it wasn't a matter of injury, or,... (
show quote)
I can't even tell you how many times that story has been told. "My master used them as place holders, it shouldn't have gone live, it was an accident.". I know of at least 5 such stories in the last year (from my ladies photography forum).