Hillary Clinton to Call for Expanded Early Voting: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hillary-clinton-to-call-for-expanded-early-voting-2015-06-04...

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hillary-clinton-to-call-for-expanded-early-voting-2015-06-04

lost_found

who says we need to make voting more convenient for those that don't have flexable schedules? Heck we may all just do it like Florida and only count the ones we agree with.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

lost_found wrote:

who says we need to make voting more convenient for those that don't have flexable schedules? Heck we may all just do it like Florida and only count the ones we agree with.

or count the chaffs :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

gfreire Loc: Chapin, South Carolina

Why not to allow a mobile system to collect votes from demos only, no republicans or others allowed.
This way Hillary will win for sure...

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

gfreire wrote:

Why not to allow a mobile system to collect votes from demos only, no republicans or others allowed.
This way Hillary will win for sure...

GOP War on Voting: New Laws Could Block Five Million From Polls

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/gop-war-on-voting-new-laws-could-block-five-million-from-polls-20111003#ixzz3c6XiDKaB
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook

skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA

dirtpusher wrote:

GOP War on Voting: New Laws Could Block Five Million From Polls

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/gop-war-on-voting-new-laws-could-block-five-million-from-polls-20111003#ixzz3c6XiDKaB
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook

Oh, for crying out loud. That article is four years old.

Zophman Loc: Northwest

We should allow "call in" voting, or maybe on "facebook"...the one with the most "likes" wins? Why not put their name in a hat and pull the "winner" out? If anyone really thinks our current voting process is representative is nuts!

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

skylane5sp wrote:

Oh, for crying out loud. That article is four years old.

and just what has changed. for crying out loud :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Zophman Loc: Northwest

dirtpusher wrote:

and just what has changed. for crying out loud :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

In the past four years "Rollingstone" has been proven to lack any level of journalist integrity which makes all of their journalism highly suspect of being fair, accurate and without a biased agenda based motivation. Therefore all past publications are suspect and not worthy of consideration by rational thinking people. Such is the case herein.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

Zophman wrote:

In the past four years "Rollingstone" has been proven to lack any level of journalist integrity which makes all of their journalism highly suspect of being fair, accurate and without a biased agenda based motivation. Therefore all past publications are suspect and not worthy of consideration by rational thinking people. Such is the case herein.

lol which source hasn't carried that story, except faux.

bvm Loc: Glendale, Arizona

Zophman wrote:

We should allow "call in" voting, or maybe on "facebook"...the one with the most "likes" wins? Why not put their name in a hat and pull the "winner" out? If anyone really thinks our current voting process is representative is nuts!

It only represents real registered voters.

Zophman Loc: Northwest

bvm wrote:

It only represents real registered voters.

So in order to have "full representation" all citizens who have the right to vote should not have any restrictions on their right. Like registering. Why can't we just show a valid ID that says we are in fact a citizen? Oh I know, the folks that found the way to register wouldn't be able to find a way to get an ID?

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

bvm wrote:

It only represents real registered voters.

lol some can afford to go ski'ing in winter. early vote :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

grumpy old men that needs their depends changed :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD: :XD:

Zophman Loc: Northwest

dirtpusher wrote:

lol which source hasn't carried that story, except faux.

It's amusing to see you push information from sources that are skeptical at best, then you proclaim other sources of information are just as tainted. Obviously you care not the arrive at truth but just enjoy stirring the shit once again. I actually think you have a great forum here in UHH. Congratulations on your ruse.

lost_found

But how many of the states put laws in place since 2012 elections reducing access to voting? I know my state has and only at the last minute the court ruled that they were not in effect for the 2014 election but will be in 2016. If you can't beat them eliminate them.