wapiti wrote:
WOW! You guys are amazing. Thank you so much.
To answer some of your questions, my computer is a Dell, I use LR, on1 suite 9, and PS cc.
Before I bought this computer, I was advised to get Ram in blocks of three, thus, the 9gb's.
Not knowing the camera you had prior to the D800, I would say that what you are experiencing is probably normal and expected. You may have only one physical hard drive in the computer, which will certainly slow down On1 and PSCC, but it won't make a difference with LR. Ram, especially with D800 files, really should be a minimum of 16gb. The more ram you have, the less often your system will resort to using the scratch disk, which will most definitely improve program execution in PS and On1. Multiple, fast hard drives are the answer.
CPU speed will affect LR performance, as will the number of cores. Faster clock and more cores will help.
An older graphics card with 512gb is ok, but it is slower than the current crop, and Lightroom will be slow when moving from image to image, while the card clears the frame buffer.
Your system I am guessing is about 7 yrs old, judging from the few details you have provided. Everything is faster these days.
You are not going to like my suggestion, but I think that trying to upgrade this system would be throwing good money after bad. Your best alternative is to replace it with something newer and faster. If you want, I can help you with a configuration, based on your budget and performance expectations. Since 1983 I have personally built over 3,000 custom systems for high end engineering, architectural and graphics applications - and without a doubt, I can help you avoid costly mistakes because of bad advice. It's not that your computer is outdated - I am sure it works just fine with the original software and camera files that you bought it for - but the performance you require to satisfactorily run your new "stuff" is way beyond your old system's capabilities. I experienced the same dilemma when I bought my D800 last year. I was running an Intel i5 2500k cpu, 16 gb ram, 60 gb SSD cache on the system 1 tb mechanical drive, and a RAID 5 with 3 1 TB drives. I do lots of panos, focus stacking and HDR, and on my bigger panos the system would drop to its knees, and with On1 8 it would actually crash the system if I applied more than one or two effects at a time.
I was able to get an i7 2600k overclocked to 4.5 gHz, 32 gb ram, upgraded my slower older NVidia card to a Quadro K1100 with 2 gb, and replaced the 3 WD black drives with a set of 4 WD Re drives - and I no longer have to make myself a cup of coffeed and consume it waiting for a large pano to be stitched. I recently created a 13 shot pano with 31,000 px x 7400 px and the system survived the experience. There are a number of motherboards that offer the Intel cache scheme, and I would highly recommend it - you end up with 95% of the performance of an SSD-only system drive, but a 1 TB with a small SSD will cost you far less than a 1 TB SSD only.
Send me a PM if you are interested in my help.