Billyspad wrote:
By careful and considered deduction, as I speak Im the only other person who has commented, I assume "sarcastically dismissive" is aimed at moi?
Pray show me where I have been sarcastic in any way about Edies image? I in fact gave her faint praise about some aspects of it
.Any hint of sarcasm here, and it is a hint rather than full blown, is aimed at those who may come along waving the artistic banner and playing the trombone to impress with their "artistic critique head" firmly screwed on backwards. I know this is not you Dave but could apply to those that follow.
A critique section is about helping people to the best of ones at times feeble ability. I firmly am of the belief that before one attempts to practice artistry its helpful to learn the basics of ones craft.
I believe Michelangelo was pretty hot with a pencil and paper before he got the Sistine chapel gig.
My message containing words of kindness to Edie were to point this out.
Rambling on about tumbling tussocks or whatever will just produce some more very so so tumbling tussocks. Learn the basics well, produce a few stunning images and then when you take a shot of a tumbling tussocks it rocks, it rolls, it demands attention rather than sit rather limply hoping to get noticed.
By careful and considered deduction, as I speak Im... (
show quote)
Hey, Billy,,
In fact, no, Billy, my comment re: " dismissive sarcasm" was not aimed specifically at you, but you did happen to be the most recent source the sarcasm I mentioned. And it obviously continues in your response above.
Mea culpa maxima eat if I over-estimated an intended " hint" of sarcasm. And if it was directed at a supporter ("moi") of a concept rather than at the concept itself, the connection seemed sufficiently clear and explicit, and definitely warranting the estimate.
To the fact that some of us ascribe greater significance to certain aspects of image content that others might consider to be of lesser consequence I merely say "Three cheers for diversity!". Uniformity of opinions on matters of creativity and art would, I think, lead to deadly dullness. If everyone valued only the same aspects of a work that you vaue, or only those that I value, the UHH would quickly turn into a regrettably small club, don't you think?
You have likely caught onto realization that attempts to humorously forestall comments on aspects of photographic image evaluation that some, personally, consider to be of lesser or of pretentious significance than do others can just as often elicit more pointed mention of them ... and, when warranted, exaltation, even!
You were obviously dismissive of the concept of the role of pattern in composition which was precisely what my comments about the "tilted tussocks" ( in contrast to the random jumble of grasses/reeds and the regularly vertical and parallel trees that you derided) was all about.
There is a great variety of artistic vision and expression to be seen here at UHH, and it would be regrettable were it's breadth and depth to be squelched by over exuberant "lobbying" by one mindset or another.
I'm sure you understand that my thoughts and attitudes, like yours, are merely personal opinions...no more, but certainly, no less.
And of course, "your ...and my...,mileage may vary"
I do hope we can continue to,wave our own flags and banners of artistic vision and expression without attempting to tear down those of others.
Best regards,
Dave