Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Apple May Be Changing the Photography World. Again.
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Mar 26, 2015 08:03:50   #
Just Fred Loc: Darwin's Waiting Room
 
With all the attention focused on the Apple Watch, new Macs, iPads and iPhones, what may be significant news has been largely overlooked. From Apple Insider:
Apple Insider wrote:
"An Apple patent published on Tuesday details a miniaturized iPhone camera system that employs a light-splitting cube to parse incoming rays into three color components, each of which are captured by separate sensors.

"As granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Apple's U.S Patent No. 8,988,564 for a 'Digital camera with light splitter' examines the possibilities of embedding a three-sensor prism-based camera module within the chassis of a thin wireless device, such as an iPhone. Light splitting systems do not require color channel processing or demosaicing, thereby maximizing pixel array resolution.

"Commonly found in prosumer video cameras, and more recently in handheld camcorder models, three-sensor imaging technology splits incident light entering a camera into three wavelengths, or colors, using a prism or prisms. Usually identified as red, green and blue, the split images are picked up by dedicated imaging sensors normally arranged on or close to the prism face.

"Older three-CCD cameras relied on the tech to more accurately capture light and negate the 'wobble' effect seen with a single energy-efficient CMOS chip. Modern equipment employs global shutter CMOS modules that offer better low-light performance and comparable color accuracy, opening the door to entirely new shooting possibilities.

"Apple's design uses light splitting techniques similar to those applied in current optics packages marketed by Canon, Panasonic, Philips and other big-name players in the camera space. For its splitter assembly, Apple uses a cube arrangement constructed using four identical polyhedrons that meet at dichroic interfaces.

"By coating each interface with an optical coating, particular wavelengths of incident light can be reflected or allowed to transmit through to an adjoining tetrahedron. Adjusting dichroic filters allows Apple to parse out red, green and blue wavelengths and send them off to three sensors positioned around the cube. Aside from RGB, the patent also allows for other color sets like cyan, yellow, green and magenta (CYGM) and red, green, blue and emerald (RGBE), among others.

"Light splitters also enable other desirable effects like sum and difference polarization, which achieves the same results as polarization imaging without filtering out incident light. The process can be taken a step further to enhance image data for feature extraction, useful in computer vision applications.

"Infrared imaging can also benefit from a multi-sensor setup, as the cube can be tuned to suppress visible wavelength components, or vice versa.

"Tuesday's patent is an extension of a previously published Apple invention that uses mirrors and optics to achieve optical image stabilization without eating up valuable space. In such embodiments a foldable, or mobile, mirror redirects incoming light, bouncing it toward a rectangular tube that terminates with a cuboid light splitter. In between the mirror and sensor package are a series of lenses that can be operably moved for focus and zooming. Motors are applied to vary the mirror's angle to offset hand shake recorded by onboard sensors.

"It is unclear if Apple intends to implement a light splitter into a future product, though the company is working hard to keep iPhone at the fore of ultra-mobile photography. For example, the latest iPhone 6 Plus includes an OIS system that produces sharp images even in low-light situations.

"Apple's cube light splitter camera system patent was first filed for in 2011 and credits Steven Webster and Ning Y. Chan as its inventors."
"An Apple patent published on Tuesday details... (show quote)

The article and accompanying diagrams may be found here: http://appleinsider.com/articles/15/03/24/apple-invents-3-sensor-iphone-camera-with-light-splitting-cube-for-accurate-colors-low-light-performance

Reply
Mar 26, 2015 08:27:54   #
ottopj Loc: Annapolis, MD USA
 
The future of photography is not the mirror less, it's the cell phone.

Reply
Mar 26, 2015 08:31:01   #
Sherman A1 Loc: St. Louis, MO
 
ottopj wrote:
The future of photography is not the mirror less, it's the cell phone.


It seems that is the case.

Reply
 
 
Mar 26, 2015 08:46:39   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
http://www.maclife.com/article/gallery/what_were_they_thinking_10_strange_apple_patents#slide-0

Reply
Mar 26, 2015 10:44:44   #
randomeyes Loc: wilds of b.c. canada
 
Sherman A1 wrote:
It seems that is the case.






The future of photography is the camera. I cannot see myself running up to a moose in the wild with my cell phone, if I did it would be only once!!! ha, ha!

Reply
Mar 26, 2015 12:29:54   #
ottopj Loc: Annapolis, MD USA
 
randomeyes wrote:
The future of photography is the camera. I cannot see myself running up to a moose in the wild with my cell phone, if I did it would be only once!!! ha, ha!


I believe the nature of photography is capturing an image via some mechanical means. This lets out painting and drawing and possibly other things which I cannot recall, right at this moment..

So, if, at some time in the future, you could capture a fabulous image of a moose from 200 yards away on your cell phone you wouldn't do it?

Reply
Mar 26, 2015 13:56:58   #
randomeyes Loc: wilds of b.c. canada
 
ottopj wrote:
I believe the nature of photography is capturing an image via some mechanical means. This lets out painting and drawing and possibly other things which I cannot recall, right at this moment..

So, if, at some time in the future, you could capture a fabulous image of a moose from 200 yards away on your cell phone you wouldn't do it?




I'll still stick to my dslr, if the moose got too close, I would still have a chance of fending it off with my 5lb tele!!, unless of course the cell phone you are talking about also has an attached .308.

I think by the time you will be able take a good photo of the bell on a moose with a cell phone, I will be pushing up daisies.

Reply
 
 
Mar 27, 2015 05:51:16   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Just Fred wrote:
With all the attention focused on the Apple Watch, new Macs, iPads and iPhones, what may be significant news has been largely overlooked. From Apple Insider:
The article and accompanying diagrams may be found here: http://appleinsider.com/articles/15/03/24/apple-invents-3-sensor-iphone-camera-with-light-splitting-cube-for-accurate-colors-low-light-performance


It's not going to change a thing for me. I shoot Nikon for one reason - the results. If Nikon went away, I would shoot Canon. If Canon went away, I would find a way to afford Leica, or go to medium format. As far as Apple is concerned, they can do whatever they want. It won't change a thing for me, or for photography in general. It's only going to change things for the selfie crowd.

I could not imagine how close I would have to be to get this picture. As it was, I only had a 24-70 on a full frame, and I was not about to start fumbling around changing a lens, lest I lose the moment or become bear food.


(Download)

Reply
Mar 27, 2015 06:16:24   #
Bobbee
 
ottopj wrote:
The future of photography is not the mirror less, it's the cell phone.


</sigh>

Reply
Mar 27, 2015 06:53:12   #
Haydon
 
i agree with Gene on this point and there are many alternatives. I really can't see Apple changing things. They hold 10% of the market for a reason.

Reply
Mar 27, 2015 07:08:52   #
Pandylou Loc: The Levant
 
Bobbee wrote:
</sigh>




:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Mar 27, 2015 08:19:09   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Just Fred wrote:
With all the attention focused on the Apple Watch, new Macs, iPads and iPhones, what may be significant news has been largely overlooked. From Apple Insider:
The article and accompanying diagrams may be found here: http://appleinsider.com/articles/15/03/24/apple-invents-3-sensor-iphone-camera-with-light-splitting-cube-for-accurate-colors-low-light-performance

I saw this article last night. It's amazing how Apple is pushing forward. With more money than most small countries, they can do whatever they want. Canon and Nikon better start worrying. :D

Reply
Mar 27, 2015 08:53:09   #
nokin
 
I take a lot of pictures of bears, moose,wolves, etc... in Nature and never had problems before. I treat animals with great respect. If they don't feel comfortable, I quit. I'm the intruder. Bears are more afraid about us than we are about them. Just once, I was charge by a big moose male when I was in a kayak. I go back fast to about 100 feet away where both we agree for that distance.

Reply
Mar 27, 2015 09:17:19   #
ottopj Loc: Annapolis, MD USA
 
Haydon wrote:
i agree with Gene on this point and there are many alternatives. I really can't see Apple changing things. They hold 10% of the market for a reason.


That's what HP said about 20 years ago.

Reply
Mar 27, 2015 09:26:13   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
About 90% of what I do is macro. I've yet to see a camera phone that can adjust lighting ratios AND capture a quality image at 1:1. Try holding a cell phone and stacking 80 images….

Yes I have an iPhone. I use it to call people, as a calendar, and as an address book. I don't take selfies: I'm not pretty or famous-- and the bagel I just had is unlikely to interest anyone I know….

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.