Anyone use Q-tips to clean lens?
Mar 18, 2015 13:46:35 #
I bought these on Amazon. The best I have found so far.
Microfiber Cleaning Cloths - 10 Colorful Cloths and 2 White ECO-FUSED Cloths - Ideal for Cleaning Glasses, Spectacles, Camera Lenses, iPad, Tablets, Phones, iPhone, Android Phones, LCD Screens and Other Delicate Surfaces (Black/Grey)
by ECO-FUSED®
Microfiber Cleaning Cloths - 10 Colorful Cloths and 2 White ECO-FUSED Cloths - Ideal for Cleaning Glasses, Spectacles, Camera Lenses, iPad, Tablets, Phones, iPhone, Android Phones, LCD Screens and Other Delicate Surfaces (Black/Grey)
by ECO-FUSED®
Mar 18, 2015 13:47:29 #
Mar 18, 2015 13:51:24 #
bookman
Loc: Southeast Michigan
I agree with oldjobber. You came here looking for "thoughts or opinions", then refute every one that was offered, and then claim that you "prefer factual evidence". :shock: :shock:
Seems like you're just looking for an argument, but that's only MY thought and opinion.
Must be a slow day in Sacramento. :thumbdown:
Seems like you're just looking for an argument, but that's only MY thought and opinion.
Must be a slow day in Sacramento. :thumbdown:
Mar 18, 2015 13:51:47 #
steve_stoneblossom wrote:
It appears to me you've gotten some highly qualified replies in the last page or so (amfoto1, DragonTom, thank you!). Have you reached a conclusion?
Yes, I should post more frequently, that way I am guaranteed a higher number of insulting replies.
Mar 18, 2015 13:57:22 #
Never. They contain fibers that would remove the protective coating on the lens.
Mar 18, 2015 13:57:23 #
steve_stoneblossom
Loc: Rhode Island, USA
Earworms wrote:
Yes, I should post more frequently, that way I am guaranteed a higher number of insulting replies.
I concur.
From the evidence you present, I see no reason to believe that your posts should illicit anything but insulting replies.
Mar 18, 2015 13:58:01 #
bookman wrote:
I agree with oldjobber. You came here looking for "thoughts or opinions", then refute every one that was offered, and then claim that you "prefer factual evidence". :shock: :shock:
Seems like you're just looking for an argument, but that's only MY thought and opinion.
Must be a slow day in Sacramento. :thumbdown:
Seems like you're just looking for an argument, but that's only MY thought and opinion.
Must be a slow day in Sacramento. :thumbdown:
I haven't refuted everyone. Have your eyes checked or use some of those old T-shirts to clean your eyeglasses, then maybe you'll be able to see clearly.
Nice day here in Sacramento, about 74 degrees.
Mar 18, 2015 14:06:09 #
steve_stoneblossom wrote:
I concur.
From the evidence you present, I see no reason to believe that your posts should illicit anything but insulting replies.
From the evidence you present, I see no reason to believe that your posts should illicit anything but insulting replies.
Illicit means illegal or not allowed. Too bad you are so smart that you don't know the difference between illicit and elicit.
Mar 18, 2015 14:07:19 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Man, I suggest you use iron wool. Not abrasive at all.
I prefer to use trichloroethylene and a steel brush over steel wool. The brush get's those stubborn particles. Then use the steel wool for polish.
Mar 18, 2015 14:15:01 #
steve_stoneblossom
Loc: Rhode Island, USA
Earworms wrote:
Illicit means illegal or not allowed. Too bad you are so smart that you don't know the difference between illicit and elicit.
Quite astute. Which confirms for me that you are, indeed, being intentionally obtuse and provocative.
Mar 18, 2015 14:15:24 #
steve_stoneblossom wrote:
That statement could be interpreted two ways. Is your obtuse behavior intentional or congenital?
I wouldn't know, I'm too busy mapping my genome.
Mar 18, 2015 14:17:40 #
steve_stoneblossom wrote:
Quite astute. Which confirms for me that you are, indeed, being intentionally obtuse and provocative.
The provocation originates with repliers like you.
Mar 18, 2015 14:20:51 #
bookman wrote:
I agree with oldjobber. You came here looking for "thoughts or opinions", then refute every one that was offered, and then claim that you "prefer factual evidence". :shock: :shock:
Seems like you're just looking for an argument, but that's only MY thought and opinion.
Must be a slow day in Sacramento. :thumbdown:
Seems like you're just looking for an argument, but that's only MY thought and opinion.
Must be a slow day in Sacramento. :thumbdown:
It takes two to argue. Don't participate.
Mar 18, 2015 14:22:52 #
Mar 18, 2015 14:24:32 #
steve_stoneblossom wrote:
So, Earworms, yea or nay on the swabs for your lenses?
Neigh.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.