Some nursing homes do not allow their residents to be photographed, even just for personal use (by that I mean...even though you do not have any intention at all to publish it in the paper...just want it as a keepsake say for a scout visit, or class visit etc).
JimH
Loc: Western South Jersey, USA
ouizee47 wrote:
Some nursing homes do not allow their residents to be photographed, even just for personal use (by that I mean...even though you do not have any intention at all to publish it in the paper...just want it as a keepsake say for a scout visit, or class visit etc).
You're on private property. They can do whatever they want. (Unless it's a county hospital, but even there, courts have held that patients in a medical facility have a reasonable right of privacy). But I bet that if you ask nicely, and take Uncle Fred out to sit on a park bench away from all the other residents, and snap a momento for Aunt Agatha, the N/H might just let you. If not, wheel the old boy out to the sidewalk and snap away.. :)
I was not interfering with traffic or posing a danged, I was just taking a photograph and he interfered with me. Of course I gave him no argument.
Nikonfan70 wrote:
The only time a police officer will bother you is you are interfering with traffic, or in his opininion doing something that poses a danger to yourself or others and of course if there is an ordinance against what your are doing.If someone enters and remains on your property after you asked him to leave, He is trepassing and you could have him arrested.
While all you cop bashers are salivating, I would like to give you another thing to think about. Maybe, just maybe, the cops don't like video and picture taking because it is an officer safety issue. Bad guys have been shown, in studies, to study video and stills which depict coppers doing their job, to see see if their training or responses leave them open and vulnerable in any way. While I'm at it, something cop bashers don't like to hear is that less than 1 percent of all officers tarnish the badge with poor behavior - that is a better stat than people of the Clergy. So go photograph something you know something about and leave the cops alone to do their jobs.
Is this post really still going?
Act Responsibly
There I said it, now lets move on.
St3v3M wrote:
Is this post really still going?
Act Responsibly
There I said it, now lets move on.
THANK YOU..... this posting has gone on way too long.
What no one has mentioned is that it is legal to take pictures of people for editorial reasons, or just publishing pictures, but not for advertising purposes, without having to have them sign their permission.
This, of course, does not give permission for pedophiles to take pictures of children.
Lol this days yes it is hard and you feel like you have to be looking over your shoulder. But hey keep it with you they can't take your camera away etc. Good luck, don't let them stop you from taking pics.....
imntrt1 wrote:
While all you cop bashers are salivating, I would like to give you another thing to think about. Maybe, just maybe, the cops don't like video and picture taking because it is an officer safety issue. Bad guys have been shown, in studies, to study video and stills which depict coppers doing their job, to see see if their training or responses leave them open and vulnerable in any way. While I'm at it, something cop bashers don't like to hear is that less than 1 percent of all officers tarnish the badge with poor behavior - that is a better stat than people of the Clergy. So go photograph something you know something about and leave the cops alone to do their jobs.
While all you cop bashers are salivating, I would ... (
show quote)
how can you call cop bashing i guess you clicked the link? seem like its they that do the bashing. cops are like congress on the take everytime they can.
Farmers Wife wrote:
...you have no right to butt in and take pictures of people in their worst hour or some child just ran over by a car....
You do, actually, as long as you're not in the way. What should stop you is not your 'rights', or an officious, know-nothing cop, but good taste and being a decent human being.
Cheers,
R.
kcornman wrote:
Fact is that if you don't follow their direction, right or wrong, they can just arrest you on a variety of charges--loitering, disorderly conduct, failure to comply, etc.--then simply release you later, dropping the charges, & you really have no recourse.
So give in and act like a slave in a police state? No, you do have recourse: the media. If the police won't behave civilly and legally, you first complain to the police force, so that it won't happen again (or at least, it's less likely) and if the police give you the run-around, go to the local paper. Kick up a stink.
Over the years, I've been stopped occasionally by the police, but if you are civil and acting within the law, there is nothing at all they can legally do. Fortunately I've never been stopped by a cop who is stupid enough to believe otherwise: probably (I hope) because very few cops are that stupid.
As for the 'rights' card, I really don't think it would do much good. An angry copper won't read it; a civil copper won't need it.
Cheers,
R.
Libbypics wrote:
As a former Deputy Sheriff who worked the Traffic Unit, writing tickets and investigating crashes (where I took my own photos, starting my love of this field), I am not surprised that some of you are "harassed" by police. I can't count the number of cars I stopped for a traffic violation intending to write a warning, only to have the driver greet me with "What the **** do you want?" Guess what!! Every one of those drivers wound up with a ticket!! YOUR attitude goes a LONG way toward how the encounter will end. If some smart aleck handed me a card and gave me the name of his lawyer, we would have a much longer and much more unpleasant encounter than the guy who remained cheerful, positive, and simply told me what he (or she) was doing. Remember, law enforcement officers are supposed to check out anything that "doesn't look right". Don't automatically assume they are "picking on photographers. Oh, and keep the "Rights" card in your wallet, not in your hand! And, I know (and knew) what the rights of photographers were and are. My big problem was with the media, including one helicopter pilot jerk who was actually moving evidence around at the scene of a fatal crash which killed a police officer "to make a better shot". Things deteriorated rapidly for him when he told me to "Get out of my way, son. Don't you know who I am?" Do you know how hard it is to find a tow truck to remove a helicopter after the pilot has been arrested?
As a former Deputy Sheriff who worked the Traffic ... (
show quote)
Nice story, and of course absolutely fair.
Cheers,
R.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.