Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
New Equipment
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
Feb 15, 2015 02:12:47   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
Could your old friend be digitized?

Maybe it can be updated over to a digital back?
Something old to something new, might clear away those blues for you. ;)

Reply
Feb 15, 2015 06:13:31   #
leftyD500 Loc: Ocala, Florida
 
BasqueLady wrote:
Sony A7II is also a full frame and is very interesting. I own the Sony A7r and love it Sony are great cameras. I also have Canon cameras and use the Canon lens on my Sony.


Interesting. I wasn't aware that canon lenses can be used on other cameras. Are your canon lenses EF or EF-S?

Reply
Feb 15, 2015 06:24:24   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
DobiePower wrote:
I used to take a lot of pictures, but in the last few years life interfered and I wasn't as active. Now I am wanting to get more involved again and I am considering replacing my camera with a new model. I have a Minolta Maxxum 7D. I also have a lot of really nice Minolta lenses (which is why I am still using the Minolta body). So I have been considering the Sony A-99, but I decided to do some research before I made up my mind. I like to do nature and macro photography. Another consideration as I look for cameras is full-frame digital and whether it is valuable enough to pay the money to get it. What cameras would you recommend I look at?
I used to take a lot of pictures, but in the last ... (show quote)

I'm sure you'll love whatever you get. The search is a major part of the fun. Don't rush it.

Reply
 
 
Feb 15, 2015 07:59:23   #
ralphc4176 Loc: Conyers, GA
 
There are some Sony cameras that will accept Minolta lenses directly (I think Sony calls that an A mount) but the newer Sony cameras require an adapter to use Minolta (and, I think, A-mount Sony) lenses. With the number of lenses you have, I would strongly suggest that you select a Sony camera body which accepts the Minolta lenses without an adapter.

Reply
Feb 15, 2015 09:11:40   #
picturesofdogs Loc: Dallas, Texas.
 
CHOLLY wrote:
^^^With a large investment in Minolta glass then buying a new A99 or A7/A7II/A7R is the way to go. :thumbup:

Now one other thing to consider: right now the A77II, an APS-C sensor camera... is one of the hottest products on the market.

It shoots 12 frames per second in RAW + JPEG, has 79 Autofocus points and the AF system from the A99 with several improvements. The image quality is EXCELLENT for an APS-C camera and it would work extremely well with your legacy glass.

I mention this because a new copy can be had for LESS than $1000.00... and the camera would be a steal at TWICE the price!

So you can definitely stick with Sony and be able to meet all your photographic goals PLUS use your existing lenses. :thumbup:
^^^With a large investment in Minolta glass then b... (show quote)


The camera being described is the a6000. It's aps-c and under $700.
The A7ii is full frame and $1600 body only. It's 5fps.
I own and love both.

Reply
Feb 15, 2015 09:12:15   #
h1h1d4mje
 
I think you should try the A7ii with your old glass and then go from there if you want some new glass this is a great camera for the money and it is on sale now.

Reply
Feb 15, 2015 09:14:51   #
picturesofdogs Loc: Dallas, Texas.
 
SonnyE wrote:
Could your old friend be digitized?

Maybe it can be updated over to a digital back?
Something old to something new, might clear away those blues for you. ;)


Not economically feasible or physically possible.

Reply
 
 
Feb 15, 2015 09:52:47   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
h1h1d4mje wrote:
I think you should try the A7ii with your old glass and then go from there if you want some new glass this is a great camera for the money and it is on sale now.


Just a reminder that the A7ii is E-mount and requires as adapter for A - mount lenses.

The A77ii is A-mount, but is a crop sensor.

And the A99 is both A-mount and full sensor.

Reply
Feb 15, 2015 09:53:49   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
picturesofdogs wrote:
Not economically feasible or physically possible.


:cry: Well, it was a thought. :-(

Reply
Feb 15, 2015 10:04:25   #
RedIris Loc: MN, USA
 
www.dpreview.com says:

The Sony Alpha 7 II is the follow-up to the original Alpha 7 and adds 5-axis sensor-shift image stabilization to its 24MP full-frame CMOS sensor.

Reply
Feb 15, 2015 10:26:02   #
h1h1d4mje
 
You are correct, I meant a meant the A7711

Reply
 
 
Feb 15, 2015 11:46:17   #
tainkc Loc: Kansas City
 
Would you like the straight dope? I too have the same camera as you. It is an "A" mount, which Sony incorporated into it's original Alpha series. This means that all the lenses that you have for your Maxxum will fit an a77 or an a99 for instance. This correlates directly into you pocket book. It will save you a ton of money. This is why I went with Sony while doing my homework on buying a digital camera. I saved over $10,00.00 by doing this vs. buying a Nikon or Canon with the same type of lenses. The picture quality (I.Q.) is second to none using my Minolta lenses on my Sony cameras. I have the a500 and the a580 (which I am currently using).

Now then, Sony has some really good new cameras out there that they also call an "Alpha", but they are not true Alpha's. They use an "E" mount base for the lens, which is a totally different animal. You will have to purchase an adapter if you wish to use your Minolta lenses. Sony sells adapters for around $350.00. There are 3rd party adapters that are much cheaper. They are not as good, but they get the job done and the picture turn out just fine. Oh, and don't be intimidated by the electronic viewfinder. You will get used to it pretty quick and you will notice that you will have more control in low light situations. I kind of like the a99 but I would rather go with the a77 ll myself. It is cheaper and I don't blow my photos up to 200x600 feet.

Reply
Feb 15, 2015 12:05:55   #
bgl Loc: Brooklyn,New York
 
DobiePower wrote:
I used to take a lot of pictures, but in the last few years life interfered and I wasn't as active. Now I am wanting to get more involved again and I am considering replacing my camera with a new model. I have a Minolta Maxxum 7D. I also have a lot of really nice Minolta lenses (which is why I am still using the Minolta body). So I have been considering the Sony A-99, but I decided to do some research before I made up my mind. I like to do nature and macro photography. Another consideration as I look for cameras is full-frame digital and whether it is valuable enough to pay the money to get it. What cameras would you recommend I look at?
I used to take a lot of pictures, but in the last ... (show quote)


Your 7D is a crop sensor camera, right? What kind of a job does/did it do for you in terms of nature and macro photography? What exacting needs do you have requiring a full frame body? I personally can't imagine, considering how far Sony has come with the A77II, what benefit you would get from full frame for the kind of photography you mentioned. It may sound trite but in the end you should get the most camera you can afford that will meet your needs. So much of your decision is subjectivity based that determining the economic value of going full frame can only be made by you.

Reply
Feb 15, 2015 12:12:32   #
DobiePower Loc: Texas
 
I like that shot, the colors are beautiful. I may not know what you mean by flare, because I didn't see anything objectionable in that shot - I liked it.

Reply
Feb 15, 2015 12:33:51   #
DobiePower Loc: Texas
 
My Minolta lenses are A-mount lenses.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.