Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Compact Camera for Long Distance Hiking
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Feb 12, 2015 10:58:04   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
geezer7 wrote:
.... The LX100 sensor is larger than the RX100iii's but the LX100 is heavier. ....


3.63 ounces.

Reply
Feb 12, 2015 11:01:03   #
geezer7 Loc: Michigan
 
Cdouthitt wrote:
There was just a sale on the LX100 earlier this month $699. It only lasted a couple of days, but if you are patient I'm sure the sale will pop up again.
NewEgg just had refurb Rx100iii for $599

Follow these two sites over the next couple of weeks to see if either camera goes on sale.
http://www.43rumors.com/category/deals/
http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/category/deals/


Thanks for the links. We aren't going until September so I will probably want to cogitate for several months before taking the plunge!
Is Digital Review the best place to compare these two cameras?

Reply
Feb 12, 2015 11:03:32   #
geezer7 Loc: Michigan
 
bsprague wrote:
3.63 ounces.


Yeah, I know. But incremental increases can continue until I think my D7100 would be OK! :D

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2015 11:13:08   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
geezer7 wrote:

Is Digital Review the best place to compare these two cameras?


to compare specs I start here:
http://snapsort.com/compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-LX100-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX100-III/specs

I really don't pay too close attention to the "overall score", but I look closely at the DXO Marks scores at the bottom.

From there I generally will hop over to DPReview.com for more information.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx100
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-cybershot-dsc-rx100-m3

Reply
Feb 12, 2015 11:13:12   #
Magicman
 
None of the above cameras come close to the quality of image and flexibility of sony 's RX 100. The model M2 is in your price range and gives away only an oled viewfinder to M3. Google any review and you will be sold. Panorama mode for you should close the sale. Look it up buy on Amazon.

Reply
Feb 12, 2015 11:20:02   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
Magicman wrote:
None of the above cameras come close to the quality of image and flexibility of sony 's RX 100. The model M2 is in your price range and gives away only an oled viewfinder to M3. Google any review and you will be sold. Panorama mode for you should close the sale. Look it up buy on Amazon.


Have you shot or even held an LX100?
Looks comparable to me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WChsqZxhIE
http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/sony-rx100-iii-vs-panasonic-lx100-vs-canon-g7-x
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Panasonic_Lumix_LX100/verdict.shtml
http://www.cameradebate.com/2014/panasonic-lumix-lx100-vs-canon-powershot-g7-x-vs-sony-cyber-shot-rx100-iii-vs-canon-powershot-g1-x-mark-ii/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4K7v3IyuMnE



Reply
Feb 12, 2015 11:21:40   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
Magicman wrote:
None of the above cameras come close to the quality of image and flexibility of sony 's RX 100. The model M2 is in your price range and gives away only an oled viewfinder to M3. Google any review and you will be sold. Panorama mode for you should close the sale. Look it up buy on Amazon.
Thats what I thought for the couple years I've had my Sony RX100. My new Panasonic LX100 is beginning to change my opinion! In my state, buying from B&H always saves me close to 10% due to sales tax.

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2015 11:45:06   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
You might consider the Sony a6000. I don't know if they are available refurbished.

The only downside is that, based on my NEX-7, battery power is somewhat limited because of the LCD and EVF. A camera with an optical viewfinder that lets you keep the LCD off might be better.

Reply
Feb 12, 2015 12:01:41   #
47greyfox Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range
 
Ditto on the S100, plus the added benefit of a built-in gps. The S110 refurb (wifi, no gps) is available at the Canon site for $180. I also have the G16, which I also like, but it's definitely not a small pocket camera. The Canon S-series PowerShots are really sweet cameras.

Reply
Feb 12, 2015 12:27:59   #
Canon Fodder Loc: Martinsville, Indiana
 
Cant really help you with the camera thing, but I sure would like to see some of your pictures when you return from your trip. Have a safe trip!!

Reply
Feb 12, 2015 12:42:23   #
Magicman
 
LX 100 is considerably bigger, more expensive, 12mp vs 20mp and no panorama. No contest for your needs. Buy the RX 100 and if you don't like it return it.

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2015 13:12:33   #
photosarah Loc: East Sussex, UK
 
geezer7 wrote:
My wife and I have hiked the Tour of Mont Blanc twice. It is a 105 mile 11 day trek with accommodation in mountain refuges and occasionally in small hotels in villages. We carried all our gear in our backpacks and since we are now both 70 we try to limit the weight. We are planning on hiking the GR5 (Geneva to Nice - actually we will only walk half which should take about 14 days). After this long preamble, I will get to the point!
We have a Canon S90 which we bought in 2010 and found it great for trekking because it fits in a small case which I can attach to my clavicle strap and can access it without difficulty. Last year we bought a D7100 and enjoy it but it is both too bulky and too heavy for our proposed trek.
My question is whether we would benefit from an upgrade to our S90? Generally we would be interested in landscapes in good light. Our experience is that long telephotos are not very useful for this application.
I know the Canon SX50 is a great camera (my son-in-law has one) but too bulky for carrying on a clavicle strap.
I would appreciate any suggestions. Would successors to the S90 offer much advantage?
I would like to keep under $500 and am comfortable with refurbished. I like to shoot in raw.
We wrote a report of our experience and a link follows:

http://hiking.topicwise.com/doc/MontBlanc2012

I'm looking forward to your suggestions.
My wife and I have hiked the Tour of Mont Blanc tw... (show quote)


Sonya6000. I don't know what it costs in the US, but it is under £500 now in the UK. Wonderful camera, I took it to China, plus a Canon 5D Mkii and used the Sony almost exclusively. Very fast focus, very sharp, very light.

Reply
Feb 12, 2015 13:43:01   #
rdfarr Loc: Floridian living in AL
 
I use my Canon S100 instead of my Nikon D7000 for my trips where weight/bulk need be minimalized. Great camera and produces some great images. I'd like the S110 with the wireless transfer of photos, but it's not necessary.

Reply
Feb 12, 2015 13:57:25   #
geezer7 Loc: Michigan
 
photosarah wrote:
Sonya6000. I don't know what it costs in the US, but it is under £500 now in the UK. Wonderful camera, I took it to China, plus a Canon 5D Mkii and used the Sony almost exclusively. Very fast focus, very sharp, very light.


Thanks for the suggestion. The camera has impressive specs but I think I need a fixed lens compact.

At this point the main candidates are the LX100 and the RX100iii if I decide to upgrade.

Reply
Feb 12, 2015 13:59:53   #
geezer7 Loc: Michigan
 
Canon Fodder wrote:
Cant really help you with the camera thing, but I sure would like to see some of your pictures when you return from your trip. Have a safe trip!!


Thanks. I'm sure that we will produce another blog like the one in my original post. We have found that documenting our adventures is very gratifying and allows us to revisit our experiences in a concise location.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.