Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Porthcurno Beach at dawn
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
Feb 9, 2015 15:24:50   #
Big Stopper Loc: London
 
Here's another one of this beautiful beach. My only reservation about this shot is not having an "anchor" on the right - there was a small amount of headland but unfortunately this got "lost" when I levelled the photo. Note to self - make sure the camera is level!!!

BTW, please have a look at the download, thanks.


(Download)

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 15:37:19   #
cmc65
 
Luggerbugs wrote:
Here's another one of this beautiful beach. My only reservation about this shot is not having an "anchor" on the right - there was a small amount of headland but unfortunately this got "lost" when I levelled the photo. Note to self - make sure the camera is level!!!


Just beautiful. Can I ask which lens you used for this shot?

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 15:39:52   #
photophile Loc: Lakewood, Ohio, USA
 
Luggerbugs wrote:
Here's another one of this beautiful beach. My only reservation about this shot is not having an "anchor" on the right - there was a small amount of headland but unfortunately this got "lost" when I levelled the photo. Note to self - make sure the camera is level!!!


I love the lighting throughout this lovely scene. :thumbup:

Reply
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Feb 9, 2015 15:41:00   #
cmc65
 
Luggerbugs wrote:
Here's another one of this beautiful beach. My only reservation about this shot is not having an "anchor" on the right - there was a small amount of headland but unfortunately this got "lost" when I levelled the photo. Note to self - make sure the camera is level!!!

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 15:43:38   #
Big Stopper Loc: London
 
cmc65 wrote:
Just beautiful. Can I ask which lens you used for this shot?


Many thanks for looking and I'm really pleased you like it. The lens is a Canon 16-35 f2.8 at 17mm, ISO 100 and 1/13th of a second. Lens was mounted on a Canon 5D III. I know you didn't ask for the extra details but just thought you may be interested.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 15:47:26   #
cmc65
 
Luggerbugs wrote:
Many thanks for looking and I'm really pleased you like it. The lens is a Canon 16-35 f2.8 at 17mm, ISO 100 and 1/13th of a second. Lens was mounted on a Canon 5D III. I know you didn't ask for the extra details but just thought you may be interested.


thank you, yes. I have the 7DM2 and the first L lens I got is the new 100-400 L II. However, like you, I live on the coast and my next purchase is going to be a wide angle. This is one I was considering. thank you. I like all your photographs, but find this one outstanding.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:03:32   #
Big Stopper Loc: London
 
photophile wrote:
I love the lighting throughout this lovely scene. :thumbup:


Thank you Karin, always love to hear from you and you're always complimentary.

Reply
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Feb 9, 2015 16:06:24   #
Big Stopper Loc: London
 
cmc65 wrote:
thank you, yes. I have the 7DM2 and the first L lens I got is the new 100-400 L II. However, like you, I live on the coast and my next purchase is going to be a wide angle. This is one I was considering. thank you. I like all your photographs, but find this one outstanding.


If you have the 7DM2 then you'll need the Canon 10-22 (or equivalent) for a similar perspective.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:11:45   #
cmc65
 
Luggerbugs wrote:
If you have the 7DM2 then you'll need the Canon 10-22 (or equivalent) for a similar perspective.


Yes and now they just announced the 11-24 but it's an f4. But it would be in the ball park and I am planning to get a FF before the year is out. So many decisions, so few $$$'s. ;)

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:23:43   #
Big Stopper Loc: London
 
cmc65 wrote:
Yes and now they just announced the 11-24 but it's an f4. But it would be in the ball park and I am planning to get a FF before the year is out. So many decisions, so few $$$'s. ;)


If you're after a landscape lens then I wouldn't be put off just because the 11-24 is f4. If on the other hand you're going to get yourself a full-frame camera then the 16-35 f2.8 is a fabulous lens.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:28:23   #
cmc65
 
Luggerbugs wrote:
If you're after a landscape lens then I wouldn't be put off just because the 11-24 is f4. If on the other hand you're going to get yourself a full-frame camera then the 16-35 f2.8 is a fabulous lens.


Thank you for the feedback. I make my best decisions by looking at other people's photography. Thank you for sharing yours.

Reply
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Feb 9, 2015 16:36:24   #
Bob Yankle Loc: Burlington, NC
 
You can use content-aware fill when leveling photos to that you never lose any pixels Luggerbugs. I use it quite often.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:40:33   #
Big Stopper Loc: London
 
Bob Yankle wrote:
You can use content-aware fill when leveling photos to that you never lose any pixels Luggerbugs. I use it quite often.


Thanks Bob, I didn't know about that so will check it out. It's good to learn new things.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:54:45   #
jederick Loc: Northern Utah
 
Love your seascapes and this one is magnificant! :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:59:57   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Another stunning wide-angle capture. Love it!

Reply
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.