Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 ; older AF-S vs. newer AF model?
Jan 15, 2015 15:50:02 #
Need some help Hogs. Searching for a used or new 80-200 f/2.8 Nikkor. In my search I'm finding a few of the older AF-S models. Prices used are about the same as a new AF model. Are these AF-S models better than the newer AF ones? I have a D700, so I can utilize both lenses. In my research I learned that this was Nikon's first attempt at a motor driven autofocus lens. So is their first Silent Wave Motor worth used what I can get a new AF model for? And what about build quality and performance? Thanks.
Jan 15, 2015 16:08:15 #
devolution wrote:
Need some help Hogs. Searching for a used or new 8... (show quote)
Ken Rockwell has a history list of all of these, from oldest to newest. He also has reviews on each. I know many do not like all that Rockwell says, myself included, but his lens reviews are pretty useful
There are most certainly some good and cheaper older 80-200 F2.8's out there, one still in production even, [and so not as cheap]. I am definitely looking into these for a future bargain lens with good quality
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/80-200mm-history.htm
Jan 15, 2015 16:10:36 #
I wanted to add that optically, ALL of these are very good. There are some differences as for correction of distortion, CA, and flair/ghosting, as these issues tend to have more improvements added as the models get newer.
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Jan 15, 2015 16:12:27 #
Thanks glgracephoto. I checked Ken's reviews. He likes the lens, but does give it a few knocks, such as too much plastic used in the build .
Jan 15, 2015 16:30:47 #
glgracephoto wrote:
Ken Rockwell has a history list of all of these, from oldest to newest. He also has reviews on each. I know many do not like all that Rockwell says, myself included, but his lens reviews are pretty useful
There are most certainly some good and cheaper older 80-200 F2.8's out there, one still in production even, (and so not as cheap). I am definitely looking into these for a future bargain lens with good quality
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/80-200mm-history.htm
There are most certainly some good and cheaper older 80-200 F2.8's out there, one still in production even, (and so not as cheap). I am definitely looking into these for a future bargain lens with good quality
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/80-200mm-history.htm
I agree,
I had the oldest AF version, one with the one-touch focus/zoom ring, and in real world use, couldn't see any IQ difference between it and the newest ones. (I don't shoot test targets). It was clearly slower to focus and I now much prefer two rings.
(Gail, Please use parenthesis() in your text instead of brackets. They mess up the ability to "Quote Reply" properly. I fixed yours to make this work.) :D
Jan 15, 2015 18:22:16 #
The "newer" AF model is actually the older model, its just that Nikon still manufactures it as it is a highly desirable lens to those who want the focal length without the VR. The NEWER AF-S model of the 80-200mm F2.8 was discontinued when the AF-S 70-200mm F2.8 VR lens was introduced.
Both the AF and AF-S versions of the Nikon 80-200mm F2.8 are beautiful lenses and very sharp optics. The AF-S will focus faster due to the SWM focus motor in the lens. The older AF model is built like a tank and will last literally forever if properly treated.
The first AF 80-200mm F2.8 was a push/pull zoom.
The second AF 80-200mm F2.8D was also a push/pull, but was a D lens.
The third AF 80-200mm F2.8D was a two-ring lens.
The fourth AF-S 80-200mm F2.8 lens was the SWM version.
I have versions 2 and 3 in the store at the moment.
Both the AF and AF-S versions of the Nikon 80-200mm F2.8 are beautiful lenses and very sharp optics. The AF-S will focus faster due to the SWM focus motor in the lens. The older AF model is built like a tank and will last literally forever if properly treated.
The first AF 80-200mm F2.8 was a push/pull zoom.
The second AF 80-200mm F2.8D was also a push/pull, but was a D lens.
The third AF 80-200mm F2.8D was a two-ring lens.
The fourth AF-S 80-200mm F2.8 lens was the SWM version.
I have versions 2 and 3 in the store at the moment.
Jan 16, 2015 06:06:14 #
devolution wrote:
Need some help Hogs. Searching for a used or new 8... (show quote)
I like the AF-S version more than the new 70-200s, but Nikon no longer supports it with parts, so it will be hard to get it fixed if it breaks.
Another consideration is the excellent 80-200 AF-D - no motor, still in production, and very sharp. Perhaps not quite as sharp as the 70-200 on paper, but for all intents and purposes there is plenty of contrast and detail. If you plan on using it with a TC, it won't work with Nikon's TCs without physical modification. But you can use the excellent Kenko TCs which will work without the mod. Best part - a new one is $1100, and good used copies go from $600 - $800.
Jan 16, 2015 07:17:25 #
RICHARD46
Loc: New Jersey
MT Shooter wrote:
The "newer" AF model is actually the old... (show quote)
How much for version 2 and 3
Jan 16, 2015 08:19:35 #
I lucked out. Ordered a used 80-200 F2.8 push/pull version for $400 version from one of the big, respected stores & got the 80-200 F2.8 D version lens shipped to me instead.... One sweet lens !!! The store told me to just keep it...I give them most of my business anymore...
Jan 16, 2015 08:23:32 #
Here is my 5 cents (pennies are discontinued in Canada). I have a D300s and a D700. I was using the Nikkor 20-300 but found it a bit soft, so I sold it and replaced with 80-200 AF-D and 300 AI-s. I am extremely pleased with my decision. For those doing the focal length math, I have a Nikkor 17-35 and a Nikkor 24-70 and was never using the low end of the wide zoom range. For $600-$700 the 80-200 AF-D is one of the best values on the street. I looked at the AF-S briefly but they are hard to find, hard to service and I was not too excited about using v.1 VR. The AF-D is less complicated and built to outlive my grandchildren
Jan 16, 2015 09:24:03 #
I have the "Version 4" and really like it. I looked at the newer model that was a Direct Drive (No SWM) but didn't like it as much. My perception was that the focusing was slower. I use this lens on a D7100 and shoot sporting events at night and indoors. The lens performs very well under those conditions.
I am considering selling this lens, since I may make the move to Canon.
I am considering selling this lens, since I may make the move to Canon.
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Jan 16, 2015 09:43:38 #
I also have the 4th version of this lens, and think it is a winner . Bought it used. Built like a tank. I find that the photos I get with it are tack sharp. As Rockwell notes however, this lens is big, bulky and quite heavy - not practical for a walk around lens. BTW: the hood for this lens is nearly as big as the lens itself!
Jan 16, 2015 11:31:33 #
I have had at least the last three versions that MT Shooter mentioned, and I kinda remember the other one, but that was too long ago. What I do remember is that they were all great optically. The biggest difference, obviously, is the increased speed of the AF once the SWM was added. I currently own the VR version, but I don't much care for the VR in this one and I've had some issues with it over the years. What I don't like about the newer VR II version is the lack of focus stop buttons, and that has prevented me from getting it. Although I'm not particularly fond of push/pull zooms, all the lenses made by Nikon were winners both in their time and now. I would not hesitate on any of the lenses MT Shooter listed. The only other thing I can add is that the first SWM version was a monster, physically, whereas the VR version was less menacing, especially when shooting children. Hope I have helped.
Jan 16, 2015 11:51:30 #
robertvente
Loc: Holland/England
adwlogin wrote:
I have the "Version 4" and really like it. I looked at the newer model that was a Direct Drive (No SWM) but didn't like it as much. My perception was that the focusing was slower. I use this lens on a D7100 and shoot sporting events at night and indoors. The lens performs very well under those conditions.
I am considering selling this lens, since I may make the move to Canon.
I am considering selling this lens, since I may make the move to Canon.
Even after the D750 came out? You might reconsider that move.
Incredible camera. Of course you will have your reasons, just thought I would mention it. One amazing piece of gear..
Jan 16, 2015 12:48:54 #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
I agree,
(Gail, Please use parenthesis() in your text instead of brackets. They mess up the ability to "Quote Reply" properly. I fixed yours to make this work.) :D
(Gail, Please use parenthesis() in your text instead of brackets. They mess up the ability to "Quote Reply" properly. I fixed yours to make this work.) :D
Who knew? computers are so weird! Sorry, and I will try and remember, I always used brackets out of sheer laziness, I hate typing and do it poorly, and they required less effort!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.