Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Help: I Am Being Sued for Nearly $500,000 by a Model I Photographed
Jan 11, 2015 23:09:10   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
Help: I Am Being Sued for Nearly $500,000 by a Model I Photographed
http://petapixel.com/2015/01/11/help-sued-nearly-500000-model-photographed

Reply
Jan 12, 2015 07:08:01   #
sb Loc: Florida's East Coast
 
It is sad. You can be sued for anything, and being in the right does not protect you from a huge debt for attorney fees or from destruction of your reputation. It is what physicians face often (not to say there are not plenty of justifiable malpractice suits) - sometimes the insurance company wants to quietly settle, and sometimes that is better than years of ongoing bad publicity and legal expense. Sometimes people feel they can get a quick buck from filing a frivolous suit.

Reply
Jan 12, 2015 10:59:23   #
Bridges Loc: Memphis, Charleston SC, now Nazareth PA
 
St3v3M wrote:
Help: I Am Being Sued for Nearly $500,000 by a Model I Photographed
http://petapixel.com/2015/01/11/help-sued-nearly-500000-model-photographed


In our country the accused are innocent until proven guilty. Unless they can produce a sales receipt, invoice, or bank statement showing you personally sold the images to one of these porn sites or companies, I don't think they can win anything. Of course even without winning, they have still caused you a lot of harm as I expect you hiring an attorney and loss of faith in your photography business is/has been expensive. Have you thought of counter suing for defamation of character? If they can't prove their allegations, this is exactly what they've done!

Reply
 
 
Jan 12, 2015 17:06:05   #
DrPhrogg Loc: NJ
 
I got to thinking about how to determine the source of the leak. What about putting letter or number codes embedded in the photo. Using dark blue on a black background would not show, but could be changed in a digital image to show the code. In print, you would have to determine how much contrast would be needed to prove a case. Printers can embed a code to ID a specific printer. Why not create your own code based on distribution: CD= customer digital, CP=cust. print, etc.
Don't know if this would work, but it can't hurt. At least you would have a trail.

Reply
Jan 12, 2015 18:10:53   #
NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian
 
St3v3M wrote:
Help: I Am Being Sued for Nearly $500,000 by a Model I Photographed
http://petapixel.com/2015/01/11/help-sued-nearly-500000-model-photographed


Too many lawyers, not enough business to go around.

Reply
Jan 12, 2015 18:55:35   #
dljen Loc: Central PA
 
Bridges wrote:
In our country the accused are innocent until proven guilty. Unless they can produce a sales receipt, invoice, or bank statement showing you personally sold the images to one of these porn sites or companies, I don't think they can win anything. Of course even without winning, they have still caused you a lot of harm as I expect you hiring an attorney and loss of faith in your photography business is/has been expensive. Have you thought of counter suing for defamation of character? If they can't prove their allegations, this is exactly what they've done!
In our country the accused are innocent until prov... (show quote)


The court of public opinion can often be the more cruel judge.

Reply
Jan 12, 2015 19:53:25   #
bikerbill7
 
Strikes me if she put them on facebook she would pretty much make them public domain. (I don;t like Facebook)

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2015 00:00:20   #
OonlyBonly
 
dljen wrote:
The court of public opinion can often be the more cruel judge.


So true. :thumbdown:

Reply
Jan 13, 2015 00:00:46   #
OonlyBonly
 
dljen wrote:
The court of public opinion can often be the more cruel judge.


So true. :thumbdown:

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.