Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Mastermind behind 9/11 (Page 2): Not getting much mileage out of this thread, eh Larry ? ? ?

slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again

Not getting much mileage out of this thread, eh Larry ? ? ?

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

slocumeddie wrote:

Not getting much mileage out of this thread, eh Larry ? ? ?

Your comment helps keep it on the front page, Eddie.

Thanks for your help.

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

larrypayne wrote:

You're about 14 years late in asking that question, Idaho.

Do you have any idea how boring this 911 Jew hating stuff is? Why don't you go back to the Kennedy /Oswald crap for a few years?

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

slocumeddie wrote:

Not getting much mileage out of this thread, eh Larry ? ? ?

YA, it's not 50 pages of the same old shit again and again and again.

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

idaholover wrote:

YA, it's not 50 pages of the same old shit again and again and again.

These topics make you Zionist trolls work for your filthy lucre.

That's what really bothers you.

Hoot72 Loc: Lexington, KY

larrypayne wrote:

Check the 14 points above as to more being said . . .

All that is either irrelevant or it has been debunked. In fact each point has been addressed by those opposing you many times. That information still exists on UHH.

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

Hoot72 wrote:

All that is either irrelevant or it has been debunked. In fact each point has been addressed by those opposing you many times. That information still exists on UHH.

Nothing in those 14 points has been debunked.

Your saying so does not make it so.

Hoot72 Loc: Lexington, KY

larrypayne wrote:

Nothing in those 14 points has been debunked.

Your saying so does not make it so.

Well, I'm not going back through it. I have already done so several times.

Hint: It's covered in http://www.debunking911.com/ or the JOD for which there is a link in this link.

I don't have to rely on 'my saying so' as you often do. UHH readers can judge for themselves. (I think all but you three in the Unholy Trio and maybe a total of three more on all UHH blogs have already made their determinations and favor the official narrative.)

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

Hoot72 wrote:

Well, I'm not going back through it. I have already done so several times.

Hint: It's covered in http://www.debunking911.com/ or the JOD for which there is a link in this link.

I don't have to rely on 'my saying so' as you often do. UHH readers can judge for themselves. (I think all but you three in the Unholy Trio and maybe a total of three more on all UHH blogs have already made their determinations and favor the official narrative.)

Those who favor the official narrative have agendas which make them susceptible to the obvious lies.

Lifelong hard core conservatives cannot accept that a Republican-led administration could be involved in mass murder of U.S. citizens.

That truth cannot penetrate a mind which is so thoroughly indoctrinated in conservative dogma.

If those conservatives would use their brains for something besides insulting liberals, they would realize many so-called liberals were involved in the planning and execution of 9/11 as well. The truth of 9/11 could not be hidden from the masses unless the Jewish-owned media conducted a cover-up of the facts--and they have done so ever since 9/11.

Hoot72 Loc: Lexington, KY

larrypayne wrote:

Those who favor the official narrative have agenda... (show quote)

I give you specifics. You ignore what I gave you. You respond with here-to-fore unaccepted generalities. ---Typical of a "sloppy thinker".

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

Hoot72 wrote:

I give you specifics. You ignore what I gave you. You respond with here-to-fore unaccepted generalities. ---Typical of a "sloppy thinker".

You've never given readers anything but lies, Hoot.

Your reputation for lying and subterfuge is firmly cemented here.

Hoot72 Loc: Lexington, KY

larrypayne wrote:

You've never given readers anything but lies, Hoot.

Your reputation for lying and subterfuge is firmly cemented here.

Hint: It's covered in http://www.debunking911.com/ or the JOD for which there is a link in this link. is not a lie.

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

Hoot72 wrote:

Hint: It's covered in http://www.debunking911.com/ or the JOD for which there is a link in this link. is not a lie.

Your links are all lies as well.

hilarleo

A marriage comedy pair made in heaven ?:-) Arguing about minutiae of something you clearly agree on suggests some religious-fundamentalist thinking

Let's suppose there is plenty of evidence the 9/11 situation was pre-wired by Bush-family contractors for demolition. Would this preclude other arrangements and operations?

It's possible that false-flag black-ops "need to know" secrecy means multiple conspiracies could actually play against each other- while colluding within a single successful attack.

Since 2014, Joseph Farrell has suggested how patriotic, higher-level teams (players above CIA /Bush-Family level) became aware of the Bushs' windfall planning and then attempted to subtly co-opt the criminal Bush players.
This might explain the perpetrators' genuine expressions of conflict and confusion
and an underlying functionality in the redundant & conflicted operations we see in the real-time chronology of this fated day