sr71
Loc: In Col. Juan Seguin Land
that's nothing new, however if it outperforms our current Kc135's then might not be a bad acft other than the inflated cost.
sr71 wrote:
that's nothing new, however if it outperforms our current Kc135's then might not be a bad acft other than the inflated cost.
Inflated cost is SOP. One good thing about using this plane is that parts should always be available, compared with a plane built in limited numbers solely for the military.
The other plane being offered was a modified Airbus 330. There were arguments about the A330 being a European plane and what would happen if something happened to the supply line. But then, what else is new?
nicksr1125 wrote:
The other plane being offered was a modified Airbus 330. There were arguments about the A330 being a European plane and what would happen if something happened to the supply line. But then, what else is new?
I'm not a big fan of our military hardware - like the main gun on the Abrams tank - being made in other countries. Germany was making a 105mm gun for us, but making a 110mm gun for their own tanks. On a TV show rating tanks, theirs was #1, and the Abrams was #2. Now the Abrams has a 120mm gun, as does the German Leopard.
sr71 wrote:
that's nothing new, however if it outperforms our current Kc135's then might not be a bad acft other than the inflated cost.
Why do you assume the cost is inflated? The contract is for 179 planes at approximately $50 billion. That works out to about $30 mil per plane. A standard 767 costs between $190 and a $193 million.
The Air Force currently uses the KC-135(modified Boeing 707) and the KC-10 (modified McDonnell Douglas DC-10) Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas a few years back. The KC-135 has been the backbone of inflight refueling all the way back to the Cold War, it has given years of excellent service, the plane was re-engined a few years back to make it 30% more fuel efficient and reduce noise levels on take-off, many are stationed with the Air National Guard at civilian airports. The 135 is an excellent platform for air refueling and for ferrying fighters across oceans. Like the B-52 Americans really got their money's worth out those aircraft. I would imagine that the 767 or KC-46 will continue that tradition. The 767 has been a good performer for the airline industry. The KC-46 offers more transferable gas and longer range. One interesting note the B-52 carries almost as much fuel as the KC-135 weighs fully loaded. The B-52 carries approximately 312,000 lbs of fuel which is roughly 46,000 gallons.
Been in the cockpit, of the A/C for my icon, on the receiving end of mid air refueling, it's scary.
Been in the cockpit, of the A/C for my icon, on the receiving end of mid air refueling, it's scary.
The US is #1 in defense spending. This just keeps it that way. Long live the Federal Reserve printing press. What it does is technically illegal, but sanctioned by the Council on Foreign Relations. Our job as citizens is just agree with DC.
Look at the recent SCOTUS ruling on the 4th Amendment. The tanker expense is minor in comparison.
The current, and very old KC135 is a modified Boeing as we'll. This is, and always will be the most efficient way to produce a new and specialized aircraft for the military. The new fuel truck, so to speak, is a huge technology improvement and significantly more fuel efficient than the KC135. Also, there will be no more black smoke trails with the new 767....an added bonus!
sboyd
Loc: Houston, Texas
The cost per plane is actually $279 million, if the total was $50 billion divided by 179 planes.
Calsnap
Loc: Seattle/Montana/San Diego
It went well. I happened to be walking to my car when I heard jet noises and when I looked up saw the plane with it's T33 photo chase plane right above me. It took me a few seconds to realize I was holding my camera. I got off two shots before it got into the wires and trees.
I'm visiting in Marysville WA across the bay from the north end of the Paine Field runway just a bit east of the approach. This is a typical view of heavy traffic landing here.
A KC 135 is a Boeing 707. What is not to like about this one being another Boeing passenger plane?
Heaven only hopes they spend enough extra to paint them white, or even refrigerate them, so they will keep the fuel cool enough to keep the F35s flying????
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.