Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Composition: Beyond the Rule of 1/3's
Page <<first <prev 8 of 64 next> last>>
Dec 21, 2014 13:44:51   #
architect Loc: Chattanooga
 
Juxtaposition is important in architectural photography.



Reply
Dec 21, 2014 13:58:31   #
SnapperBug Loc: Utah
 
Definitely a yes from me!

Reply
Dec 21, 2014 13:59:32   #
thix2112
 
Graphic

Triangles
Triangles...

Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2014 14:03:16   #
thix2112
 
Ralloh wrote:
I think this has kind of a magical look to it with the ball of light seeming to come from the end of the plant.


Ralloh -

Very nice. You definitely have some sort of Fibonacci sequence going on with your photo!

Tom

Reply
Dec 21, 2014 14:08:56   #
phit4life Loc: Indiana
 
This is a great subject for me. I'm just learning and really only understand the thirds concept.

Reply
Dec 21, 2014 14:12:23   #
wolfd Loc: Vancouver, Canada
 
SharpShooter wrote:
Lets talk about composition! It seems we just never do that here. This IS after all a PHOTOGRAPHY forum. But we never talk about photography
So here goes....,I'm hoping to actually promote a meaningful discussion that explores way beyond simple photography that goes well beyond the rule of thirds.
What is it that makes photography compelling? I see way to many pretty pictures that don't actually have a subject, or at least not a well defined or strong subject. Understanding how to assemble a composition is key. I would like to discuss some of the compositional elements that are contained in engaging compositions and will identify these aspects as the following:
Graphic
Edgy
Tension
Environmental
Juxtaposition
So what do these terms actually mean and how do they manifest themselves in photographs? Understand that any one photograph may contain several or even all of these in one photograph. And there is no single clear-cut meaning to these as well.
I feel that the more of these one can assemble into a composition, the more powerful and engaging a photograph becomes, though it's not necessary. To some, these concepts may be seemingly elusive but to the truly more experienced photographers they are merely the building blocks of composition and planned into a shot.
It is these concepts that experienced photographers use to consistently build compelling and engaging photographs. This is the kind of photography that will stir something inside of you, or cause you to question the work, turn away or want you to see more.
To often we see a posted image and the poster has to explain the entire shot and story. That is only necessary when a shot is too weak to actually stand on its own merit. Remember, a pic is worth a 1000 words. Let your shots speak for themselves!
I invite all to comment and add to the meaning of the concepts especially with a pic for an example. But remember, NO STORIES or TITLES, let your image do the talking. We only need to know how the pic relates to the concept.
I invite all to participate. And the first guy who mentions the kind of camera used....a big hook will come out and take them away!! :lol:
I will start in the next post(to be sure this is not removed by admin) with a simple GRAPHIC shot to demonstrate that concept.
Lets have a good holiday discussion!! ;-)
SS
Lets talk about composition! It seems we just neve... (show quote)


Thanks for the very interesting thread Sharpie.

Reply
Dec 21, 2014 14:15:43   #
ediesaul
 
thix2112 wrote:
Graphic


Great photo!

Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2014 14:19:58   #
revhen Loc: By the beautiful Hudson
 
ediesaul wrote:
What's "John 1:5 "?


Bible. New Testament. Gospel.

Reply
Dec 21, 2014 15:07:39   #
Cape Codder Loc: Cape Cod
 
Really interested in this topic. Unfortunately have a lot of Christmas stuff to do, so hoe I can find it again after Christmas.

Reply
Dec 21, 2014 15:14:53   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
wowbmw wrote:
For the most part I did not think we were going off topic and I am finding this discussion productive and thoughtful. Perhaps SS will get us back on topic if that seems to be the case.


wowbmw, the discussion seems to be centering on composition which is not a bad thing, it just broadens the discussion a lot! If that's where people need help we should give that a good going over.
But my main emphasis is to go beyond that and make people aware of some of the powerful tools that photographers use, and when used effectively to stir emotions in/with their photographs.
Let's keep in mind that we are still on bullet point #1 and we have a ways to go if we can all hang in there that long!! :lol:
SS

Reply
Dec 21, 2014 15:44:29   #
Kuzano
 
Here is a link to a site which has a number of links to Composition and General "rules" sites. I have used this site for about 20 years now.

http://photoinf.com/

About 25 links. Fairly obscure sites good for inspiring discussion.

Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2014 16:43:56   #
Weatherbird Loc: East Lothian, Scotland
 
Have you had a look at the Golden Rule? This rule is founded in nature's design. But rules are made to be broken! All toondeep for me.

Reply
Dec 21, 2014 16:44:30   #
Weatherbird Loc: East Lothian, Scotland
 
Have you had a look at the Golden Rule? This rule is founded in nature's design. But rules are made to be broken! All too deep for me.

Reply
Dec 21, 2014 16:55:11   #
Graham Smith Loc: Cambridgeshire UK
 
Tell me what you think of this image, bearing in mind that SS's emphasis is on "graphic"
Say if it works for you, if it does't work, it's strong points, it's weak points. Don't hold back, you wont hurt me :-D


(Download)

Reply
Dec 21, 2014 16:55:20   #
Doktor Loc: New Jersey
 
The actual rule of thirds requires that the frame be dissected into three sections both horizontally and vertically. The four intersecting points are where the main subjects should be. But that's only a suggestion...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 64 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.