Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
7100 vs full frame
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Dec 7, 2014 07:28:05   #
photo8greg Loc: Maryland
 
Full frame will not make you a better photographer and that's why we do this but if you like new stuff that's great.trust me I have been doing this for 30 years plus.

Reply
Dec 7, 2014 08:07:09   #
tor24tor Loc: Caldwell, NJ
 
You will love the D7100. I moved from a D3000 to a D7000 and actually had an easier time making exposure adjustments because I could work right off the camera back and top and not have to access the menu's on the D3000. I have no regrets and find the D7000-7100 very intuitive to learn. Good luck

Reply
Dec 7, 2014 13:08:47   #
houdel Loc: Chase, Michigan USA
 
photo8greg wrote:
Full frame will not make you a better photographer

Exactly correct. I had been using an older Canon crop sensor camera and wanted to both upgrade to a more modern body and upgrade to a full frame sensor because that better suited my photographic interests - landscape and architecture. I ended up purchasing a Nikon D610 about six months ago.

The Nikon D7100 is an excellent body; had my interests been a genre more suited to a crop sensor - sports and birding/wildlife, as your interests seem to be, I would have gone with the 7100. Don't let anyone tell you that you need a FF body "just because". Each has its strengths and weaknesses; you have the right body for your interests.

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2014 14:02:52   #
Barry G. Loc: Central Valley, Ca.
 
I to moved from the D5000 to the 7100 because I already had Glass for the camera, you will love the camera and we are both in the same learning curve.

The cost to a full frame was large so I spent the difference on a like new used Sigma 150-500. and the curve just grew but I love the combo.

Keep on shooting .

Barry

trainguy wrote:
I just watched the two links you sent me and now understand the differences. $ is obviously a factor and with the lenses I have my 7100 will be great for what I will be doing. All I need to do now is learn how to use it as it is a big step up from my 5000.

Thanks again

Dave

Reply
Dec 7, 2014 16:13:29   #
Mark7829 Loc: Calfornia
 
trainguy wrote:
That was quick; thanks; Wild life, birds etc; grandson playing Bball and later golf


You are fine with the 7100 for good photography. If you want great photography and want to make it a lifetime pursuit, then full frame is where you should go and may eventually end up.

Reply
Dec 7, 2014 16:48:12   #
saminpa2001
 
A good post that talks about crop cameras.

https://photographylife.com/sensor-crop-factors-and-equivalence

Reply
Dec 7, 2014 17:19:58   #
houdel Loc: Chase, Michigan USA
 
saminpa2001 wrote:
A good post that talks about crop cameras.

https://photographylife.com/sensor-crop-factors-and-equivalence

You need to take the "s"out of "https" when you post a link:
http://photographylife.com/sensor-crop-factors-and-equivalence

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2014 18:09:08   #
Sheila Loc: Arizona or New York
 
The best camera for you is the one that meets your needs for what you want to do. The camera you have is a fine camera for the type of photography you want to do.

I have both a D300s (dx) (same size sensor as yours) and a D810 (full frame sensor). Sometimes I use one of two older cameras or a point and shoot. It depends on where I am going, what subjects might be seen and how much I feel like carrying.

I don't suppose the person gave you a reason you needed full frame other than they cost more and weigh more.

Reply
Dec 7, 2014 23:00:16   #
tradergeorge Loc: Newport, Kentucky
 
One major benefit for me (that many overlook) of the D7100 is that it is one of the few in its class that has a focus motor. This means that in addition to all the usual suspects, it can be used with all of that nice, older "AF" designated glass. Some of those lenses are really sweet and can be found on the open market for pennies on the dollar.

Reply
Dec 7, 2014 23:52:42   #
Bozsik Loc: Orangevale, California
 
If you don't know the difference, then stick with what you have. 7100 is a decent camera. You can move up later if you want.

When you buy lenses, buy fx ones if you think you will someday buy a full frame. From the sound of your experience level, the 7100 is way more than your ability, so don't worry. Plenty of room to grow with it.

Reply
Dec 8, 2014 00:08:42   #
MrT Loc: Gilbert, AZ
 
The D7100 is a great choice for what you do. I have a 400mm 5.6 FF that gets me the equivalent of a 600 5.6 on my D7000. Could not touch a 600mm lense for non-professional use(fun).

Reply
 
 
Dec 8, 2014 03:33:04   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
trainguy wrote:
Hi again; trying to continue my education; I just bought a 7100 and have been told I should have bought a full frame body. Please tell me what a full frame is and why I should have bought one? If you need more info let me know and I'll try to answer

Thanks

Dave


Are you getting the photos that you want from you D7100? If so, don't worry about a full frame camera.

Reply
Dec 8, 2014 04:05:28   #
jfn007 Loc: Close to the middle of nowhere.
 
I find Nikon's instruction manual poorly organized. When I bought my D7000 I purchased these two book for the D7000. You might buy these for your D7100. I believe they are great reference materials.

Nikon D7100 For Dummies

David Busch's Nikon D7100 Guide to Digital SLR Photography

I hope you love your new camera.

Reply
Dec 8, 2014 04:42:01   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
trainguy wrote:
That was quick; thanks; Wild life, birds etc; grandson playing Bball and later golf


This will be quicker - you can't go wrong with either camera, until you get into poor light. Then the better light gathering capability of a full frame camera, assuming the pixel count is the same (D7100 vs D610) will prove to be an advantage.

Also, if you print your work, a larger sensor will require less magnification, which will provide better image quality.

To get the most out of full frame camera, you'll need bigger lenses, which are usually more expensive. But the optical quality is a bit better.

Reply
Dec 8, 2014 05:26:50   #
photo8greg Loc: Maryland
 
:thumbup:

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.